Managing Forests because Carbon Matters: Integrating Energy, Products, and Land Management Policy
Summary
The report examines the role of US forests and forest products in mitigating climate change, emphasizing that a rational policy must look beyond simple sequestration to include the carbon storage and substitution benefits of harvested wood. It analyzes forest carbon stocks and flows, the impact of climate-driven disturbances like wildfire and pests, and the life-cycle carbon benefits of using wood instead of steel or concrete. The authors critique the high transaction costs and measurement uncertainties of project-based carbon offsets, suggesting alternative policies such as information disclosure and updated building codes to promote the use of sustainable forest products.
Key insights
- Sustainably managed forests provide a comprehensive set of climate benefits by combining carbon storage in live trees with the storage and substitution benefits of harvested forest products.
- Forest carbon sequestration rates typically peak in the first 100 to 150 years for most even-aged stands, after which they may become weak sinks or even carbon sources as tree mortality increases.
- In western North America, climate-driven disturbances such as wildfires and bark beetle outbreaks are converting some forests from carbon sinks into net carbon sources.
- Wood products have significantly lower embodied energy than comparable building materials like steel, aluminum, concrete, or plastic, leading to a substitution effect that reduces overall carbon emissions.
- On average, every tonne of wood used in products removes 2.1 tonnes of carbon from the atmosphere through the substitution of more energy-intensive materials.
- The use of forest biomass for energy can be carbon-cycle neutral if harvests and mortality do not exceed net growth across the forest landscape.
- Project-based forest carbon offset protocols suffer from high transaction costs and significant variability in the number of credits generated for the same project depending on the protocol used.
- Market leakage—where demand is met by harvests outside a project boundary—is often underestimated in US offset projects, potentially overstating their global climate benefits.
- Measurement of forest carbon flux is hindered by 'model selection error,' which can be a larger source of uncertainty than sampling or measurement error.
- The report recommends policy alternatives to offsets, such as information disclosure on product emissions and the use of life-cycle assessments in building codes and procurement policies.
Cite the original document
- APA
- Malmsheimer, R., Bowyer, J., Fried, J., Gee, E., Izlar, R., Miner, R., Munn, I., Oneil, E., & Stewart, W. (2011). Managing Forests because Carbon Matters: Integrating Energy, Products, and Land Management Policy. Environmental and Energy Study Institute. https://www.eesi.org/files/JOFSupplement.pdf
- Chicago
- Malmsheimer, R.W., J.L. Bowyer, J.S. Fried, E. Gee, R.L. Izlar, R.A. Miner, I.A. Munn, E. Oneil, and W.C. Stewart. Managing Forests because Carbon Matters: Integrating Energy, Products, and Land Management Policy. Environmental and Energy Study Institute, 2011. https://www.eesi.org/files/JOFSupplement.pdf.
- Wikipedia
- {{cite report |last1=Malmsheimer |first1=R.W. |last2=Bowyer |first2=J.L. |last3=Fried |first3=J.S. |last4=Gee |first4=E. |last5=Izlar |first5=R.L. |last6=Miner |first6=R.A. |last7=Munn |first7=I.A. |last8=Oneil |first8=E. |last9=Stewart |first9=W.C. |title=Managing Forests because Carbon Matters: Integrating Energy, Products, and Land Management Policy |publisher=Environmental and Energy Study Institute |date=October 2011 |url=https://www.eesi.org/files/JOFSupplement.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
- BibTeX
- @techreport{malmsheimer2011managing, author = {Malmsheimer, R.W. and Bowyer, J.L. and Fried, J.S. and Gee, E. and Izlar, R.L. and Miner, R.A. and Munn, I.A. and Oneil, E. and Stewart, W.C.}, title = {{Managing Forests because Carbon Matters: Integrating Energy, Products, and Land Management Policy}}, institution = {Environmental and Energy Study Institute}, year = {2011}, month = oct, url = {https://www.eesi.org/files/JOFSupplement.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }
Full text
Collected · Record updated