Search Climate Insights Directory

The research paper examines the failure of the biofuels sector in Zambia, where government goals for poverty reduction and energy security were undermined by a lack of policy safeguards and infrastructure. It highlights how the drive for export-market cash crops like jatropha threatened local food security and how many foreign investors eventually abandoned their projects due to economic downturns and technical failures.

The Environmental and Energy Study Institute advocates for mandatory funding in the 2013 Farm Bill's energy title to support biofuels, biomass, and bio-based products. It argues that such investment is necessary to develop biomass feedstock production, finance the first commercial-scale advanced biorefineries, and help rural communities transition to renewable energy, citing the 2008 Farm Bill's $1 billion investment as a successful precedent.

The Environmental and Energy Study Institute advocates for $1.3 billion in mandatory funding for the 2013 Farm Bill's energy title to support the transition to sustainable bio-based products and renewable energy. The organization argues that such investment is necessary to establish biomass production systems, support the first commercial-scale advanced biorefineries via loan guarantees, and help rural communities shift away from expensive fossil fuels.

The 'Half the Oil' plan proposes reducing U.S. oil use by over 11 million barrels per day by 2035. This is to be achieved through efficiency gains in vehicles and buildings (saving nearly 8 million barrels per day) and innovations such as electric vehicles and biofuels (saving over 4 million barrels per day).

The Clean Air Task Force (CATF) asserts that the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) has failed to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, primarily because it has functioned as a mandate for corn ethanol. CATF argues that EPA's lifecycle analyses are flawed by relying on hypothetical 2022 production scenarios and ignoring current indirect land use change (ILUC) and the 'global rebound effect.' The document claims that cumulative GHG emissions from corn ethanol produced between 2010 and 2015 are 28% higher than those from gasoline. Furthermore, it states that the RFS contributes to global food insecurity by diverting crops and driving land conversion in tropical countries. CATF suggests transitioning to zero-carbon mobility fuels, such as ammonia, electricity, and synthetic hydrocarbons, rather than relying on biofuels.

The document examines the Vegetable Oil Development project (VODP) in Uganda, a partnership involving the Government of Uganda, IFAD, Wilmar International, and Bidco. It reports that the project has led to the displacement of local communities, the destruction of approximately 3,600 hectares of forest, and increased food insecurity. The report highlights violations of national land and environmental laws, the lack of required Environmental Impact Assessments, and the fact that production targets far exceed domestic needs, suggesting a focus on exports over local food security.

The document identifies two contradictory trends in tropical land tenure: a 'global land rush' where agricultural land is transferred from governments and communities to corporate control, and a simultaneous increase in forestland tenure granted to Indigenous Peoples and local communities. The author argues that while agricultural land transfers are driven by economic factors—such as rising food prices, changing diets, and biofuel demand—forestland transfers are primarily political, driven by rights campaigns and the financial incentives of national-scale REDD+ programs. The paper notes regional disparities, with community tenure increasing significantly in Latin America, while corporate land-grabbing is most prevalent in Africa.

The report examines the environmental, logistic, and infrastructural barriers to commercializing cellulosic ethanol from corn stover in the US, concluding that the country will likely fall short of RFS2 mandates.

The document argues that the EPA can avoid the 'blend wall'—the limit of ethanol that can be readily added to gasoline—by making corresponding reductions to advanced biofuel and total renewable fuel volume requirements when cellulosic biofuel production falls short. It warns that allowing other advanced biofuels to backfill the cellulosic void would increase ethanol use by 40% by 2021, strain global agricultural markets, and increase GHG emissions. The author suggests that if the EPA does not act, Congress should amend the Clean Air Act to mandate these reductions.

The report argues that EU biofuel policies, particularly those supporting conventional food-based biofuels, are not cost-effective and often fail to meet their stated public good objectives. It finds that significant public subsidies—estimated between EUR 5.5 and 6.9 billion in 2011—support an industry where benefits are increasingly captured by non-EU suppliers rather than EU farmers. The analysis highlights that conventional biofuels can lead to net increases in greenhouse gas emissions when indirect land use change (ILUC) is considered and contribute to higher global food prices. The report suggests that tightening vehicle emission standards to 95 gCO2/km by 2020 would be a significantly cheaper and more effective way to abate carbon emissions than subsidizing biofuels. It recommends phasing out support for food-based biofuels and implementing a 5 per cent cap on their contribution to renewable energy targets.

The document provides a comprehensive overview of energy subsidies in Thailand, detailing the mechanisms used to subsidize LPG, NGV, diesel, electricity, and biofuels. It argues that while these subsidies aim to ensure affordability, they often disproportionately benefit higher-income groups, encourage wasteful consumption, and create fiscal strain on the government and state-owned enterprises. The guide outlines the negative impacts of these subsidies, such as fuel smuggling and environmental degradation, and suggests reform strategies based on international experience, emphasizing the need for market-based pricing and targeted social assistance.

The paper argues that the EU's current reliance on voluntary certification schemes for biofuels sustainability is insufficient, especially for small-scale producers in developing countries. It proposes the use of bilateral agreements, as permitted by Article 18(4) of the EU-RED, to provide a more flexible, customized, and holistic approach to sustainability verification. Drawing on lessons from the Forest Law Enforcement Governance and Trade (FLEGT) initiative and Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs), the authors suggest that bilateral deals can address institutional weaknesses, reduce non-tariff trade barriers, and mitigate indirect land-use change (ILUC) more effectively than a one-size-fits-all 'meta-standard'.

The report addresses the interdependence of water, energy, and food (WEF) security, arguing that sectoral silos lead to unsustainable outcomes and increased risks. It reviews existing conceptual frameworks from the World Economic Forum, ICIMOD, and the Bonn2011 Nexus Conference, noting a gap in practical implementation guidance. To fill this, the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) introduces a place-based analysis framework centered on ecosystem goods and services (EGS) as the primary link between the three securities. This framework is embedded in a four-stage participatory process: assessing the current system, envisioning future landscape scenarios, developing an investment strategy, and transforming the system through adaptive management. The goal is to move from 'land-grabs' to 'land stewardship' by using natural capital as a hedge against socio-ecological risks.

The report analyzes R&D management through interviews with 17 leaders from innovative companies. It finds that while centralized R&D structures promote long-term breakthroughs, a lack of STEM talent and inconsistent tax policies hinder U.S. innovation. It highlights the effectiveness of direct government grants and technology-neutral regulations in stimulating private research, while noting that restrictive immigration and IP licensing disputes with universities drive R&D overseas.

The report examines the relationship between food price inflation, food security, and trade policy, using Morocco as a case study. It analyzes the drivers of global food price spikes and evaluates Morocco's 'Green Morocco Plan' and its 'guided liberalization' strategy. A specific focus is placed on the lentil market, where high import tariffs on Canadian lentils are argued to encourage irregular trade and increase costs for consumers. The document suggests that reducing these tariffs, combined with targeted social safety nets and productivity investments, could improve food security and accessibility for the Moroccan population.

The report argues for a paradigm shift in the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) from a focus on commodity production to the preservation of natural capital and ecosystem resilience. It identifies a 'triple challenge'—viable food production, sustainable resource management, and balanced territorial development—and proposes transition pathways including increased resource efficiency, embracing agricultural diversity, and expanding Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES). The analysis highlights the interdependence of these goals, noting that ecosystem degradation undermines both food security and the economic viability of rural areas, particularly in less prosperous regions.

The report examines Indonesia's renewable energy landscape, focusing on the institutional and regulatory frameworks governing geothermal, hydro, biomass, and biofuels. It identifies a wide array of financial, fiscal, and market-based incentives, such as the Geothermal Fund Facility and feed-in tariffs, but notes that their impact is undermined by conflicting government policies, including heavy fossil fuel subsidies and inter-ministerial disagreements.

The document advocates for a multi-scale analysis of the Water-Energy-Food (WEF) nexus to improve cooperative governance and resource management. It presents a continuum of assessment tools, ranging from qualitative index building and opportunity analysis to quantitative hydro-economic and integrated modelling (such as WEAP and LEAP). These tools are designed to identify trade-offs, mitigate supply bottlenecks, and support sustainable infrastructure planning in transboundary macro-regions and at the local level.

Malawi relies heavily on traditional biomass for energy, leading to deforestation and land degradation. The country faces energy insecurity due to a total dependence on imported refined petroleum. While Malawi has long-term experience with sugarcane ethanol and is exploring Jatropha-based biofuels, production is under-utilized due to weak institutions and infrastructure. Transitioning to modern bioenergy, including cogeneration from agricultural residues and improved cookstoves, is proposed to diversify the energy mix and reduce climate vulnerability.

The report argues that transitioning to a green economy can serve as an insurance policy for Sweden against future global shocks. Using a scenario-based 'wind-tunnel' approach, it tests the robustness of various policy options across four plausible global futures: Glocal Citizenship, Global Governance, Return of Geopolitics, and Big Business. The authors conclude that while Sweden possesses strong preconditions—such as renewable resources and high social capital—it must proactively integrate environmental considerations into the heart of economic decision-making, specifically through the Ministry of Finance, to ensure long-term stability and competitiveness.