Search Climate Insights Directory

The report critiques REDD as a flawed approach that focuses on reducing rather than stopping deforestation, potentially rewarding polluters through carbon offsetting. It highlights significant risks to Indigenous Peoples' land rights, the danger of replacing natural forests with carbon-poor plantations, and methodological failures such as 'leakage'. The author argues that market-based funding is volatile and inequitable, suggesting instead that funding should be grant-based, managed by the UN, and focused on addressing the underlying drivers of deforestation.

The report argues that REDD, as currently designed, focuses on reducing rather than stopping deforestation and risks becoming a tool for corporate profit rather than climate mitigation. It highlights significant risks to indigenous land rights, the potential for 'leakage' where deforestation simply moves to other areas, and the danger of replacing natural forests with monoculture plantations. The author criticizes the use of carbon markets to fund REDD, suggesting instead public funding derived from fossil fuel taxes and the elimination of fossil fuel subsidies.

The report critiques REDD, asserting that it is designed to reduce rather than stop deforestation and may incentivize the replacement of natural forests with carbon-poor plantations. It warns that financing REDD through carbon markets could allow industrialized nations to avoid reducing fossil fuel emissions, undermine national sovereignty in developing countries, and lead to the displacement of indigenous communities. The author argues that REDD's 'opportunity cost' calculations often benefit polluters and that the mechanism is susceptible to market volatility and corporate lobbying. The document advocates for a non-market, grant-based funding system managed by the UN, focused on ecosystem justice, the recognition of indigenous land rights, and the elimination of the underlying drivers of deforestation.

The document examines the critical relationship between forests and the global climate, highlighting the risk that temperature increases above 2-3°C could transform forests from carbon sinks into net carbon sources. It emphasizes the superior carbon storage of old-growth forests over plantations and the extreme vulnerability of peatlands, particularly in Southeast Asia. The guide warns that climate change is increasing the frequency of wildfires and pest outbreaks, while also altering species distribution. It concludes that stopping deforestation and protecting old-growth forests and peatlands are urgent priorities for climate mitigation.

The 28th SAC meeting in Miami reviewed the status of IAI's Cooperative Research Networks (CRN II) and Small Grants Programme for Human Dimensions (SGP-HD), emphasizing the need for better scientific integration across projects and increased institutional visibility. Key discussions included the development of a Latin American optical phenology network, the creation of science-society interaction proposals, and the importance of translating scientific achievements into policy briefs.

The IAI Directorate reports progress on the CRN II and SGP-HD programs, highlighting the development of a Latin American phenology network and increased stakeholder engagement in climate change planning. The report details significant academic achievements, including Nobel Peace Prize recognition for IPCC authors, and outlines capacity-building efforts through training institutes and regional workshops in the Andes and La Plata Basin. It also notes the establishment of new country contacts and institutional partnerships to strengthen climate research and policy integration across the Americas.

The IAI Executive Directorate reports on the second year of the CRN II projects and the first year of the SGP-HD program, highlighting achievements in biodiversity monitoring, stakeholder engagement, and high-profile scientific recognition, including the 2008 Nobel Peace Prize for several affiliated researchers. The report details the establishment of a phenology monitoring network in Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico, and the launch of a MacArthur Foundation-funded project on Andean biodiversity. It also outlines capacity-building efforts through joint colloquia and training institutes focused on climate change adaptation in Latin America.

The document highlights how two decades of conflict in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo have created a humanitarian crisis and severely threatened Virunga National Park. It argues that the illegal trade in park resources, specifically charcoal, funds violence and leads to deforestation, while the displacement of populations increases pressure on the ecosystem. The author contends that environmental governance must be integrated into any peace agreements to prevent natural resources from continuing to finance conflict and to support future economic recovery.

The assessment calculates a conservative annual economic value of CDN$121.35 to $130.30 million for the Pimachiowin Aki area, with fishing, water treatment, and carbon sequestration as the primary contributors. It distinguishes between values for resident and non-resident populations and highlights that the ecosystem benefits are approximately 28 times greater than the estimated public expenditures for conservation.

The report analyzes China's biofuels sector, focusing on the transition from grain-based ethanol to non-grain feedstocks grown on marginal land. It finds that government subsidies, including direct payments and tax exemptions, are essential for the industry's viability but may undermine food security, increase food prices, and cause environmental degradation. The authors conclude that biofuels have a negligible impact on China's energy security and recommend eliminating direct production subsidies.

The report assesses the environmental consequences of the ASEAN-China Free Trade Agreement (ACFTA) on the Greater Mekong Sub-region (GMS). It finds that while trade has increased, a third of the trade volume involves highly polluting sectors, with much of this pollution originating in China. In Cambodia, imports of polluting goods from China have improved the local environment at the expense of China's, while the increase in natural resource-based exports threatens resource sustainability due to weak regulation. The author concludes that the ACFTA's lack of environmental cooperation provisions is a significant policy shortcoming.

The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) warns that using food crops like corn and soybeans for biofuels increases food prices, degrades ecosystems, and can raise global warming pollution through land conversion. The UCS advocates for a shift toward 'better' biofuels derived from waste or non-food biomass, supported by a low-carbon fuel standard and performance-based public funding. While the 2007 Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) provides a foundation by requiring pollution reductions from new facilities, the UCS argues for broader sustainability criteria to prevent deforestation and protect biodiversity.

Earthjustice challenged a December 2007 Forest Service amendment to forest plans in the Sierra Nevada that reduced the number of management indicator species (MIS) monitored and limited monitoring to the forest planning level. The organization argued that this change excluded site-specific projects, increasing risks from logging and other destructive activities, and violated the National Environmental Policy Act and the Endangered Species Act. After a district court ruled for the Forest Service in August 2009, Earthjustice appealed, and the parties reached a settlement.

The working paper by the Graz Group outlines strategies to enhance the environmental integrity and completeness of LULUCF accounting. It suggests moving toward 'fuller accounting' through activities-based, emissions/removals-based, or land-use-based approaches. Key recommendations include mandatory accounting for forest and peatland degradation, a 'restricted stock-change approach' for harvested wood products to prevent false credits, and policy-based methods for 'factoring out' natural disturbances. The authors argue that current Kyoto Protocol rules allow significant emissions from degradation to go uncounted, particularly in Annex I countries that did not elect Article 3.4.

The briefing contends that forests should not be treated primarily as carbon sinks and warns that market-based REDD mechanisms risk creating climate loopholes and displacing local communities. It advocates for funding forest conservation through national programs and carbon taxes in industrialized nations rather than carbon markets, emphasizing the need to address the underlying drivers of deforestation such as agrofuels and industrial logging.

This briefing by Friends of the Earth International contends that forests provide value beyond carbon sequestration and warns that integrating REDD into carbon markets threatens indigenous land rights and climate goals. It advocates for direct funding of community-led conservation, the recognition of territorial rights for over one billion forest-dependent people, and a shift in responsibility toward industrialized nations to reduce emissions and address the root causes of deforestation, such as biofuels and industrial extraction.

The fact sheet contends that treating forests primarily as carbon sinks undermines biodiversity and the rights of indigenous peoples. It argues against the use of carbon markets and REDD, suggesting instead that industrialized nations provide direct financial support and address the root causes of deforestation, such as industrial logging and unsustainable consumption of meat and paper.

The report criticizes the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) for promoting a 'flawed model' of large-scale, export-oriented agrofuels in Latin America and the Caribbean. It argues that these projects, driven by demand from the US and Europe, lead to deforestation, biodiversity loss, and human rights abuses, such as violent land grabs in Colombia. The document asserts that agrofuels are not a viable climate solution due to land-use emissions and calls for the IDB to shift funding toward small-scale, local energy projects and truly clean renewables like wind and solar.

The document details the biological and physical shifts resulting from global warming, noting that minimum temperatures are rising faster than maximum temperatures. This trend has led to earlier ice break-up, snow melt, and the advancement of biological events such as bird nesting and plant flowering, particularly in Europe and North America. These shifts create risks of ecological desynchronization, such as polar bears in Hudson Bay having less time to hunt on sea ice.

In August 2006, the Ugandan Cabinet proposed donating 7,100 hectares of the 30,000-hectare Mabira forest to the Mehta group of companies to expand sugar plantations. This proposal triggered a massive public outcry and a coordinated 'Save Mabira Crusade' involving civil society, religious institutions, and legal experts. The campaign utilized empirical research, media engagement, and strategic litigation to challenge the government's decision. The author argues that the campaign's success was rooted in a growing public awareness of environmental rights, supported by the 1995 Constitution and the National Environment Act. The effort not only protected the forest but also served as a vehicle to expose broader governance deficits and the lack of political will to adhere to existing conservation laws.