Search Climate Insights Directory

The document argues that agroforestry can mitigate the vulnerabilities faced by young rural farmers in sub-Saharan Africa—including unemployment, food insecurity, and climate change—by creating resilient livelihood opportunities and increasing youth participation in food system decision-making.

The authors examine the alignment of climate-related official development assistance (ODA) with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Paris Agreement. They find that while there is coherence, gaps remain in aligning finance with recipient countries' needs, specifically noting a reduction in misalignment regarding NDC activities which prioritize adaptation over mitigation.

The policy brief asserts that current policy approaches in most African countries are insufficient for long-term development and resilience. It highlights that growth has been unstable, hampered by the 2007-2008 Global Financial Crisis and the 2014-2015 end of the commodities boom, while Sustainable Development Goals remain off track. The text identifies 'megatrends' such as climate change, population growth, and technological innovation as critical challenges. It specifically criticizes the continued reliance on primary commodity production and natural resource extraction, which leads to 'jobless growth' and leaves economies vulnerable to external shocks.

The Climate Bonds Initiative (CBI) established the Social and Sustainability Bond Database (SSBDB) to provide transparency on global social and sustainability debt. The methodology employs a three-step screening process—identification, use of proceeds (UoP) analysis, and SDG mapping—to determine eligibility. To be included, instruments must be self-labelled by the issuer, provide sufficient public disclosure, and not breach minimum climate safeguards. The SSBDB covers social bonds, sustainability bonds, and sustainability-linked bonds (SLBs), with some instruments appearing in both the SSBDB and the Green Bond Database if they meet the requirements of both.

The report reviews 24 financing strategies from developing countries, categorizing them into discrete adaptation strategies and general climate action strategies. It finds that while these documents help communicate priorities and attract international grants, there is a significant gap in strategic analysis regarding how to leverage public finance to attract private investment. The report emphasizes the need for stronger engagement from ministries of finance and planning, as well as improved country-level tracking of climate finance to measure the actual impact of these strategies.

The report outlines a framework for a social taxonomy that classifies business activities based on their contribution to social well-being and governance. It establishes a system of minimum social safeguards as a mandatory threshold, followed by two Guiding Principles (GP1 for positive social impacts and GP2 for governance improvements). The taxonomy uses a color-coded performance scale (Red to Dark Green) to categorize companies and activities, providing illustrative examples across sectors such as construction, finance, and agriculture to guide investors and regulators in identifying socially sustainable investments.

The document outlines how Aid for Trade (A4T) can be leveraged as a policy tool to address biodiversity loss, climate change, and pollution. It proposes six complementary pathways to 'green' A4T, emphasizing the need for alignment with the priorities of developing and least developed countries and the integration of trade considerations into environmental funding.

The Global Clean Cooking Program – Bangladesh, funded by the Green Climate Fund and World Bank, aims to disseminate 5 million improved cookstoves (ICS) by December 2023. As of May 2022, the project has installed 1,877,760 ICS, benefiting 8.23 million people and reducing 6.70 million tonnes of CO2 equivalents. While the project has successfully established a market-based supply chain through 56 Partner Organizations across 61 districts, overall implementation is behind schedule due to COVID-19 disruptions. The program has achieved significant health impacts, including a reported 86% reduction in personal exposure to carbon monoxide and kitchen PM2.5, and has increased female staff representation in partner organizations from 15% to 21%.

The document serves as a handbook for Canadian municipalities to implement the 'localization' of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through Voluntary Local Reviews (VLRs). It outlines a 'basic recipe' for successful VLRs, including the establishment of local priorities, partnerships, inclusive participation, and data collection. A central theme is the necessity of integrating Indigenous knowledge and leadership to ensure the process supports transformative reconciliation. The guide synthesizes global and regional resources and provides case studies from cities such as Kelowna, Winnipeg, Espoo, and Malmö to illustrate best practices in data visualization, community storytelling, and the 'Leave No One Behind' (LNOB) principle.

The document serves as a guide for Canadian municipalities to localize the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through the creation of Voluntary Local Reviews (VLRs). It outlines a 'basic recipe' for successful VLRs, including the identification of local priorities, the establishment of partnerships, participatory processes, and the use of diverse data indicators. A central theme is the necessity of integrating transformative reconciliation and Indigenous leadership into the VLR process to ensure inclusivity and respect for Indigenous data sovereignty. The handbook synthesizes global and regional resources and provides case studies from cities such as Kelowna, Winnipeg, Malmö, and Espoo to illustrate good practices in reporting and community engagement.

The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) developed a mapping framework and findings template to evaluate VLRs. The methodology is based on UN DESA's Global Guiding Elements and adapted to include Canadian-specific priorities, such as the Truth and Reconciliation Commission Calls to Action and OCAP principles. The framework consists of 11 categories and 101 sub-components. Pilot applications to VLRs from Kelowna, Winnipeg, Espoo, and Malmö indicate that while Canadian cities are making strides in reporting on Indigenous populations, there are significant gaps in disaggregated data and the description of specific local-level efforts to 'leave no one behind'.

The Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI) highlights the need for integrated planning to manage synergies and trade-offs between the Paris Agreement and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. The briefing presents the Low Emissions Analysis Platform (LEAP) as a unique open-access, quantitative, and prospective tool capable of analyzing both Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) and SDGs. SEI's Initiative on Integrated Climate and Development Planning has expanded LEAP with extensions for macroeconomic impacts, health, agriculture, and land use, which have been applied in 16 countries to quantify the co-benefits of climate action.

The document highlights the interconnectedness of nature, society, and the economy, using the devastating floods in KwaZulu-Natal as a catalyst for discussing climate risks. It outlines South Africa's efforts to transition from fossil fuels via a US$8.5 billion Just Energy Transition Partnership and its progress in expanding protected land and marine areas. The text emphasizes the role of innovative financing, such as the World Bank's US$150 million "Rhino Bond," and nature-based solutions in achieving sustainable development. Finally, it situates these efforts within global frameworks like the Paris Agreement and the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework, as well as regional initiatives like the African Union Climate Change and Resilient Development Strategy and Action Plan.

The Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) is launching a program to train 'Climate, Environment and Health Responders' in the Americas. The initiative focuses on a transdisciplinary (TD) approach to bridge the science-policy gap, targeting a diverse group of stakeholders including government officials, researchers, and community leaders. The program consists of a 7-week virtual mentorship and training phase, an in-person regional grant development workshop, and the awarding of seed grants for pilot studies or further grant development. A key requirement for seed grants is the procurement of co-funding, with a particular emphasis on supporting member countries with lower science and technology capacity.

The document argues that technology transfer and financing are essential for low- and middle-income countries to achieve sustainable development goals and climate ambitions. It highlights the necessity of locally adapting technologies to specific national challenges and notes a lack of understanding regarding the factors that make technology partnerships successful. The paper aims to analyze technology transfer and co-development to reimagine the global technology order.

The paper identifies the global financial system's orientation toward profitability and the concentration of wealth as primary obstacles to sustainable development. It highlights a significant funding gap for the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals in developing countries and notes that while private flows toward sustainable energy are growing due to ESG standards, they remain insufficient. The author suggests that while government fiscal capacity is limited by administrative needs, entities like sovereign wealth funds and the precedent set by Covid-19 pandemic responses indicate potential for public intervention to redirect financial flows.

The authors argue that current international financial institutions, such as the IMF and World Bank, are not designed to handle concurrent global crises including climate change, pandemics, and debt. They propose a strategic financing framework to increase annual investment in low and middle-income economies by over one trillion dollars, focusing on sustainable infrastructure, human capital, and nature conservation. Short-term priorities include the reallocation of 100 billion in Special Drawing Rights (SDRs), restructuring debts for countries pursuing green transitions, and increasing concessional finance. Long-term goals involve strengthening national and global coordination, leveraging public capital to mobilize private investment, and ensuring G7 countries are held accountable for their own domestic climate and SDG policies.

The paper examines how the unequal consumption of natural resources and the global carbon budget reinforces systemic inequality and accelerates climate change. It argues that current environmental frameworks, such as the planetary boundaries and the Paris Agreement, often fail to allocate responsibility equitably or address the colonial legacies of the global economic system. The authors call for a transformation of global governance to include marginalized voices and Indigenous knowledge systems, shifting away from a growth-dependent economic model toward one rooted in social justice and cultural reflexivity.

The document identifies the current global financial system as a barrier to sustainability, noting a funding gap of USD 8.4–10.1 trillion for the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals in developing countries. It argues that financial flows are primarily driven by perceived profitability rather than sustainability, and calls for the 'greening' of market-based investments to move from voluntary ESG initiatives to standard working practices. The author recommends that governments use fiscal measures like carbon pricing and that multilateral development institutions make sustainability norms a condition for co-financing. Additionally, the paper emphasizes the need for international harmonization of financial regulations and the equal partnership of developing countries in shaping the global sustainable finance architecture.

The paper examines the limitations of 'green growth' and absolute decoupling, highlighting how rebound effects and problem shifting hinder environmental progress. It advocates for a transition to 'strong sustainable consumption governance' that combines technological efficiency with modal shifts and absolute reductions in high-impact consumption. The authors emphasize the need to measure consumption-based emissions—which often occur outside the borders of high-income countries—and to reconcile ecological limits with social aspirations to ensure a fair distribution of resources.