Search Climate Insights Directory

The report details the findings of a two-part survey conducted between June and September 2025 with over 60 respondents from academia, government, and civil society. The results indicate a shift in priorities away from traditional investment protection and toward managing the negative impacts of investment and maximizing positive spillovers. While treaties are seen as useful for dispute settlement and international cooperation, national laws are overwhelmingly viewed as the most appropriate tool for addressing sustainable investment and investor accountability. The report also explores technical aspects of treaty reform, including the potential for treaties to scale up renewable energy and the preference for non-adjudicatory compliance mechanisms.

The report examines how mining-producer countries use local content policies to translate extractive activities into domestic economic development. Key findings indicate a primary focus on local employment and contracting, with a significant emphasis on benefits for communities near mine sites. While many governments employ mandatory requirements and incentives, the report identifies critical gaps in the use of 'rules of origin' and data-based monitoring tools. Despite challenges such as limited technical capacity and infrastructure deficits, the report concludes that these policies are generally successful when they balance local community benefits with national development and avoid unrealistic industry burdens.

The report finds a significant gap between the ESI community's awareness of value assessment methods and their actual application, with only 25% of respondents interested in conducting ESI-specific valuations. While respondents recognize that these assessments can demonstrate impact to funders and policymakers, adoption is hindered by a lack of time, limited institutional incentives, and low perceived personal benefit. The report recommends that CONVEI and other stakeholders align valuation practices with institutional reporting structures, secure dedicated funding, and develop accessible tools to lower barriers to entry.

The report analyzes data from 6,190 U.S. adults (2021-2023) to examine the 'attitude-behavior gap' in political climate action. It finds that while many Americans express willingness to sign petitions, donate, volunteer, or contact officials, actual engagement rates are significantly lower. The study identifies that 'Definitely willing and active' individuals are more likely to discuss climate change, perceive supportive social norms, and hold stronger collective efficacy beliefs. To bridge this gap, the authors recommend direct requests for involvement, simplifying the process of taking action, and amplifying pro-climate social norms.

The report identifies a significant 'attitude-behavior gap' in U.S. political climate action, where many adults express willingness to act but few do so. It highlights that those who are both willing and active possess stronger collective efficacy beliefs, more frequent communication about climate change, and a higher perception of supportive social norms. To bridge this gap, the authors recommend direct interpersonal requests, simplifying the process of engagement, and amplifying diverse pro-climate social norms.

The report highlights a divide between emerging middle powers (IBSA) and Germany regarding the war in Ukraine, the dominance of the US dollar, and the role of BRICS+. While IBSA respondents prefer mediation in conflicts and view the US dollar's dominance unfavourably, German respondents support Ukraine and view the dollar's role as favourable. Despite these differences, there is shared optimism for the G20 and a common interest in the 2030 Agenda, specifically regarding technology transfer and global public investment.

The report evaluates the South African financial sector's capacity to adopt the TNFD framework, finding that while there is high recognition of the sector's impact on nature loss, there is a significant gap in the implementation of nature-related targets and expertise. It highlights the economic value of South Africa's ecosystem services and argues that private finance is essential to meet the Global Biodiversity Framework's '30x30' conservation target.

The report positions the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) as a pivotal figure in the low-carbon transition, responsible for integrating climate risks and opportunities into a company's financial framework. Based on a survey of 50 respondents from 32 entities, it argues that early adoption of decarbonisation strategies provides a competitive advantage and recommends building robust business cases that quantify the cost of inaction. The document highlights the use of sustainable finance instruments, such as green and sustainability-linked bonds, to mobilise capital and signal commitment. Key challenges identified include the calibration of science-based targets and the difficulty of tackling scope 3 emissions, which often represent the majority of a company's carbon footprint.

The analysis finds that a majority of Americans (63%) rarely or never discuss global warming. Those most likely to engage in these conversations include Democrats, individuals with higher education, urban residents, Gen Z and Millennials, and Hispanic/Latino Americans. The study highlights a strong correlation between climate concern—specifically those in the 'Alarmed' category—and the frequency of discussion, as well as the influence of supportive social norms and media exposure in encouraging climate conversations.

A survey of 1,600 farmers in Haryana reveals that agricultural electricity subsidies are poorly targeted, with the wealthiest farmers receiving 50% of benefits compared to 30% for the poorest. The report recommends leveraging the PM-KUSUM scheme to transition low-income farmers to solar-powered irrigation and replacing flat-rate tariffs with slab-based tariffs to reduce subsidies for large landowners. It also emphasizes the need for dynamic registries and coordination between state agencies to accurately identify poor beneficiaries.

The document details an innovation partnership that tested four messaging frames—Protection, Intergenerational Togetherness, Inheritance, and Chances—to determine how the identity of being a parent can be leveraged to inspire climate action. Using YouGov surveys and A/B testing, the study found that while all messages were generally well-received, different narratives resonated with different demographic and ideological segments. For instance, parents of younger children preferred Protection and Inheritance frames, while right-leaning 'Loyal Nationals' responded well to Protection and Togetherness. The findings validate the hypothesis that focusing on parental identity can meaningfully connect individuals to climate action, provided the messaging accounts for intersecting values and identities.

The COP27 Resilience Hub served as a physical and virtual space to accelerate ambition and investment in climate resilience, representing over 1,500 non-state actors. The report identifies five cross-cutting messages, emphasizing that scaling adaptation is a prerequisite for containing Loss and Damage and that locally-led adaptation (LLA) requires radical collaboration. The document details thematic analysis across nine areas—including finance, food, water, and health—and highlights the role of Regional Resilience Hubs in amplifying under-represented voices from Africa, South Asia, Asia Pacific, and Latin America and the Caribbean.

The document argues that the disruption of world trade by COVID-19 necessitates a shift toward digital internationalisation support for green SMEs. It highlights the International Cleantech Network's (ICN) approach, which combines a reciprocal network of 18 clusters, a structured process for maturing business leads into actionable needs statements, and the 'Solved' virtual collaboration platform. Case studies from Helsinki and New York demonstrate how these tools facilitate co-creation and matchmaking when physical travel is restricted. The brief recommends investing in reciprocal partnerships, leveraging virtual tools to lower transaction costs, and using digital platforms to support long-term innovation and R&D collaboration.

The document analyzes the impact of Covid-19 on green SMME exporters in the Western Cape and evaluates how Wesgro adapted its trade promotion services. Key findings highlight that while travel restrictions severely hindered traditional matchmaking, the shift to virtual training, hybrid trade missions, and digital marketing increased accessibility for smaller firms. The report argues that these digital tools can reduce the environmental impact of business travel and help exporters adapt to emerging green economy demands and climate-related trade barriers, particularly in the EU market.

The document evaluates global government preparedness for mine closure, finding significant gaps in policy, financial assurance, and community engagement regardless of a country's development level. It highlights that while most jurisdictions require closure plans, the quality of these plans and the capacity of regulators to review them are often insufficient. Key risks include a lack of full financial assurance for closure costs and a widespread absence of records for closed or abandoned mines. The briefing argues that capacity and experience are the primary barriers to readiness and recommends that governments adopt international standards, engage communities throughout the mine life cycle, and build internal technical expertise.

The document reveals that while most governments recognize the importance of mine closure, many lack the policies, financial instruments, and technical capacity to manage them effectively. Key gaps include insufficient financial assurances, low community participation, and a lack of formal records for closed mines. The report emphasizes that these deficiencies pose environmental and social risks, particularly as hundreds of medium and large-scale mines are expected to close in the coming decades.

The document finds that while most governments recognize the importance of mine closure, many lack the policies, financial guarantees, and technical capacity to manage the process effectively, leaving them exposed to environmental and social risks.

The document examines how rangers can be both perpetrators and victims of corruption, driven by economic insecurity, weak governance, and social pressures. It highlights findings from the 'Life on the Frontline' survey, noting that low pay and late salary payments incentivize corrupt acts. The brief argues for a systemic approach to anti-corruption, recommending professionalization, independent oversight, and improved ranger well-being to protect biodiversity and human rights.

The report analyzes climate activism in the U.S. using the 'Six Americas' framework, finding that while many Americans—particularly those in the 'Alarmed' segment—express a willingness to participate in climate campaigns and political actions, actual participation rates remain low. Consumer activism, such as rewarding or punishing companies based on their climate records, is more common than direct political advocacy. The study also notes a trend toward increased alarm regarding global warming over a five-year period and highlights that perceived collective efficacy is higher for local than for national decision-makers.

A comparison of survey data from 2014 and 2020 shows that a significantly larger proportion of Americans now believe climate change will increase health harms in their communities, particularly regarding wildfires, though mental health impacts remain less widely recognized.