Search Climate Insights Directory

The document highlights that Malawi loses approximately 1.7% of its GDP annually to droughts and floods, a rate significantly higher than the average for Least Developed Countries. It advocates for a 'triple dividend' approach to resilience—avoided losses, unlocked development potential, and co-benefits—noting that benefit-cost ratios for such investments can range from 3:1 to 50:1. The brief provides evidence from infrastructure, social protection, and climate-smart agriculture to support the claim that proactive resilience is more cost-effective than humanitarian aid.

The report examines the compatibility of environmental import restrictions with WTO rules, specifically the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). It argues that restrictions based on process and production methods (PPMs) are not prohibited per se and can be justified through the concept of 'likeness' or by invoking general exceptions under Article XX of GATT. The document also provides guidance on using Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) to modernise trade rules, suggesting the inclusion of hierarchy clauses and the recognition of domestic regulatory discretion to ensure environmental obligations prevail over trade commitments.

Carbon Market Watch proposes ten principles for the EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Measure (CBAM), arguing that it must replace free allocation of allowances in the EU ETS to adhere to the 'polluter-pays' principle. The organization recommends that CBAM cover direct and indirect emissions in high-emitting sectors like steel, cement, and bulk chemicals, and be implemented as an extension of the EU ETS. Key social and diplomatic recommendations include exempting Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Small Island Developing States (SIDS), recycling revenues into climate action, and using the mechanism to complement international climate diplomacy and product requirements.

A coalition of food, farming, climate, and health organisations calls for a paradigm shift in the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) to support agroecology and sustainable food systems. The authors argue that the CAP must be reformed to integrate Green Deal targets, eliminate subsidies for harmful practices like intensive animal production, and provide financial incentives for farmers to reduce pesticide use and restore ecosystems.

The We Mean Business coalition calls for corporate climate leadership based on three pillars: aligning ambition with science-based targets, implementing concrete actions including supply chain engagement, and advocating for bold government policies. The text highlights companies like PayPal, Walmart, Ford, Facebook, LafargeHolcim, Amazon, and Ørsted as examples of businesses increasing their climate commitments or implementing decarbonization strategies.

The policy brief highlights the 'value-addition gap' in African agriculture, where low productivity and lack of energy access limit economic growth. It proposes that the AU-EU partnership focus on deploying solar mini-grids to power village-level agro-processing, reforming cooperatives to improve farmer bargaining power, and providing micro-finance and micro-enterprise training to smallholders. Using Uganda's maize sector as an example, the document demonstrates that over 60% of maize croplands could be served by mini-grids, which would displace inefficient diesel mills and reduce post-harvest losses.

An analysis of the European Investment Bank's (EIB) transport portfolio since 2015 reveals that approximately half of the investments are aligned with the Paris Agreement. To achieve full alignment and support European transport decarbonisation, the report recommends that the EIB develop a strategic project pipeline focusing on modal shift, rail electrification, shipping decarbonisation, and electric mobility infrastructure, while establishing a negative list of ineligible projects and increasing transparency regarding induced emissions.

The We Mean Business Coalition argues that integrating climate ambition into economic recovery is a strategic necessity for long-term growth and resilience. The statement highlights that green recovery measures are more effective at creating jobs and increasing GDP than traditional stimulus. It calls for specific policy actions, including the removal of fossil fuel subsidies, mandatory TCFD-aligned financial disclosures, and the requirement that companies receiving public financial assistance adopt science-based targets consistent with a 1.5°C warming limit.

ClientEarth, the Marine Conservation Society, and Oceana urge the UK Government to set 2021 catch limits based on the best available scientific advice from ICES, specifically advocating for limits not exceeding the maximum sustainable yield (MSY). The recommendations emphasize a precautionary, ecosystem-based approach, particularly for deep-sea stocks and depleted species like Atlantic cod and whiting. Key proposals include the mandatory rollout of Remote Electronic Monitoring (REM) for vessels over 10m, the implementation of Fish Stock Recovery Areas, and the use of highly selective fishing gear to reduce bycatch. The authors argue that restoring fish stocks to healthy levels would increase the value of fish landings by an estimated 37% and create over 5,000 new jobs.

The Sustainable Seafood Coalition (SSC), representing major UK seafood buyers, argues that the Fisheries Bill as drafted contains weaknesses that could undermine the sustainability of UK fisheries. The coalition calls for legal commitments to set fishing limits at or below maximum sustainable yield (MSY), the implementation of remote electronic monitoring (REM) across all vessel sizes, and a commitment to co-manage shared stocks based on scientific advice to avoid overfishing and illegal fishing.

The Climate Bonds Initiative proposes a framework for 'transition' labels to prevent greenwashing and ensure investments align with the Paris Agreement. The framework establishes five core principles for ambitious transitions: alignment with a 1.5 degree trajectory (net zero by 2050), science-based goals, the exclusion of offsets, the prioritization of technological viability over economic competitiveness, and a requirement for operating metrics over pledges. It categorizes economic activities into five types—Near Zero, Pathway to Zero, No Pathway to Zero, Interim, and Stranded—to determine whether a 'green' or 'transition' label is appropriate. The framework is designed to be flexible, applying to both whole entities (via equity or sustainability-linked bonds) and specific activities (via use-of-proceeds bonds).

ClientEarth argues that the European Commission's Offshore Renewable Energy Strategy must strictly adhere to environmental laws and the Aarhus Convention to avoid litigation and ensure sustainability. The organization emphasizes the need for regional cooperation and the harmonization of EU rules regarding grid access and offshore hybrid assets to efficiently scale offshore wind capacity, which is expected to reach over 250GW by 2050.

The report argues that the EU Commission should integrate climate and environmental protection objectives into its State aid decision-making process to ensure that national economic recovery programmes are consistent with the European Green Deal and the goal of climate neutrality by 2050.

The submission by Scientists for Global Responsibility (SGR) criticises the UK's focus on military deployment and the arms trade, urging a shift toward 'human security'. SGR identifies rapid climate change, nuclear war, and biodiversity loss as high-priority security threats and calls for the reallocation of military funding toward the 'green' economy and social needs.

The Union of Concerned Scientists argues that marginalized communities in the US face disproportionate environmental and health harms, which are exacerbated by systemic racism within federal agencies. The document recommends that agencies make equity-based analyses mandatory for significant policies, strengthen scientific integrity, and dismantle internal racial biases. Specific calls to action include rescinding certain EPA and CEQ rules, increasing the number of health and safety inspectors, and improving the meaningful participation of frontline and tribal communities in rulemaking processes.

The briefing advocates for increased stimulus funding for the Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP) to combat energy insecurity and racial disparities in the US. It highlights that low-income and non-White households face disproportionately high energy burdens and insecurity. Drawing on the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), the document suggests that expanding WAP to include electrification, investing in workforce diversity, and improving administrative coordination can maximize public health and economic benefits.

The policy brief examines a pilot project in Mokoloki, Nigeria, where a privately owned solar minigrid shares existing distribution infrastructure with a utility to provide reliable power to 'undergrid' customers. It proposes that India, which faces similar challenges with high technical and commercial losses (up to 40%) and unreliable rural supply, could adopt this model to enhance last-mile service and financial viability for distribution companies.

ClientEarth urges the European Commission to implement strict, mandatory regulations on methane emissions across the fossil fuel and agriculture sectors. The organization argues that the EU, as the world's largest importer of fossil gas, has the commercial power to mandate low-emission supply chains. Key recommendations include expanding the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) to cover methane, introducing a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) for methane-emitting imports, and reforming the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) to end subsidies for intensive livestock production. ClientEarth also highlights the health risks of indoor gas appliances and the need to counter industry misinformation by replacing the term 'natural gas' with 'fossil gas'.

ClientEarth argues that the FCA's proposals in CP20/3 are inadequate to protect consumers and ensure market integrity. The organization recommends making TCFD-aligned disclosures mandatory for all listed issuers by 2022, requiring a 'Paris-aligned' strategy for net zero by 2050, and clarifying materiality tests to align with investor expectations. It also calls for consistency with EU disclosure laws and stronger enforcement to close existing accountability gaps.

Friends of the Earth International proposes a framework for a 'just recovery' following the COVID-19 pandemic, asserting that the crisis is a result of a neoliberal, capitalist, and patriarchal system. The report outlines four principles: abandoning neoliberalism and austerity, fostering multilateral cooperation and international solidarity, strengthening democracy and human rights, and implementing a transformative system change. Key recommendations include the abolition of debts for the Global South, the transition to 100% renewable energy, the promotion of food sovereignty through agroecology, and the end of corporate impunity for transnational companies.