Search Climate Insights Directory

The proposal seeks USD 996,947 over 24 months to address critical capacity gaps in Kiribati's National Designated Authority (NDA) and broader stakeholder groups. Key objectives include operationalizing the Climate Finance Division, establishing 'No Objection' procedures, and updating the country's Strategic Framework and Country Programme. The project also aims to support the Ministry of Finance and Economic Development (MFED) in achieving GCF FMCA re-accreditation and to enhance national coordination through the Kiribati National Experts Group (KNEG).

The author argues that the Thirteenth WTO Ministerial Conference (MC13) failed to produce tangible progress on climate-related trade issues due to geopolitical tensions and opposition from members like India. While some plurilateral initiatives and external coalitions showed modest activity, the document suggests that success should now be measured by the revitalization of the WTO Committee on Trade and Environment and the development of non-binding codes of conduct rather than binding multilateral agreements.

The Civil Society Working Group on State Capture (CSWG) evaluates the Zondo Commission's impact, praising its exhaustive evidence gathering but criticising its failure to quantify the social costs of corruption and its uneven focus on private sector actors. The report calls for urgent reforms in law enforcement, public procurement, and public administration to ensure accountability and prevent future state capture.

The document argues that the current international financial architecture is obsolete and exacerbates inequality between the Global North and South, hindering climate action in Latin America. It identifies five key pillars for reform: immediate liquidity through Special Drawing Rights (SDRs), improved access to private capital via risk guarantees, sustainable debt mechanisms such as debt-for-nature swaps, long-term development loans (SDG Stimulus), and the decentralization of governance in international financial institutions. The author emphasizes that Latin America must unify its voice, potentially through Brazil's G20 presidency, to ensure the new system is a moral obligation for climate mitigation rather than a concession from developed nations.

The document outlines a USD 585,704 readiness proposal for Ecuador to bridge the gap between high-level climate objectives and actionable implementation. The initiative focuses on five priority sectors: energy, industrial processes, agriculture, LULUCF, and waste. Key deliverables include a PLANMICC Action Plan and a corresponding Investment Plan to create a pipeline of bankable projects. The project aims to address institutional capacity gaps and poor stakeholder coordination through tailored training and the establishment of sectoral working groups, with a strong emphasis on gender equality and social inclusion.

The document outlines a 30-month Readiness and Preparatory Support project for Saint Kitts and Nevis, implemented by the Caribbean Community Climate Change Centre (CCCCC). It aims to address critical gaps in institutional governance, policy frameworks, and data availability that hinder the country's ability to access international climate finance and implement adaptation measures. Key activities include supporting the GCF accreditation of the Development Bank of St. Kitts and Nevis and the St. Kitts Co-operative Credit Union (SKCCU), digitizing land resource management, and developing strategic plans for waste management, coastal zones, and urban resilience in Charlestown, Nevis. The project also intends to produce at least one bankable project concept note supported by a pre-feasibility study on nature-based solutions for coastal protection.

The proposal seeks USD 553,230 over 24 months to address Cambodia's lack of national accredited entities with on-lending and blending fiduciary functions. It focuses on supporting the accreditation of three private banks—Foreign Trade Bank Plc. (FTB), ACLEDA Bank Plc., and Advanced Bank of Asia Ltd (ABA)—and the NCSD. The project includes institutional gap assessments, capacity-building workshops, a national readiness needs assessment, and a learning exchange with other Asian countries to develop a strategic accreditation framework.

The report analyzes the current status of gender integration in Senegal's sector-specific National Adaptation Plans (NAPs), identifying significant gaps in institutional coordination and data. It details how climate change disproportionately affects women across sectors such as agriculture, fisheries, and water resources due to existing social inequalities. The document recommends strengthening the collaboration between the Ministry of Environment and the Ministry of Women, establishing a gender commission within the National Committee on Climate Change (COMNACC), and implementing gender-responsive budgeting to ensure equitable access to climate finance and resources.

The report finds limited existing climate cooperation between MDBs and NDBs and highlights a divergence in their progress toward Paris alignment. While MDBs generally have more standardized climate targets and energy policies, NDBs show greater variability and often align their goals with national determined contributions (NDCs). The authors identify operational barriers to on-lending, such as currency risks and institutional capacity gaps, and recommend optimizing operating models, clarifying climate mandates, and sharing expertise to scale global climate investment.

The proposal seeks USD 599,932 over 24 months to address five key barriers hindering the integration of green infrastructure and nature-based solutions (NbS) in Chile. These barriers include the lack of a long-term national strategy, weak interinstitutional governance, insufficient technical data, limited investment, and low public awareness. The project, implemented by the FAO and led by the Ministry of Housing and Urbanism (MINVU) and the Ministry of the Environment (MMA), will create the National Green Infrastructure Strategy (ENIV), a Monitoring, Reporting and Verification (MRV) system, and a financing strategy. Key activities include conducting technical studies on disaster risk reduction and zoning modeling for urban vegetation, as well as holding regional workshops across all 16 Chilean regions to ensure participatory development and gender inclusion.

The document outlines the gender-based vulnerabilities in Haiti's climate-sensitive sectors—agriculture, health, infrastructure, and water—and assesses the legal and institutional frameworks for gender mainstreaming. It highlights significant disparities in land ownership, credit access, and decision-making power between men and women. To address these, the report proposes a gender mainstreaming strategy focusing on awareness, capacity building, inclusive institutional arrangements, and gender-sensitive budgeting, while recommending the integration of gender experts into the National Climate Change Committee (NCCC) and municipal planning processes.

The Green Climate Fund's Accreditation Panel recommends the re-accreditation of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) for a second term, maintaining its scope for medium-sized projects and medium environmental and social risk (Category B). The assessment confirms FAO's strong technical expertise in adaptation, REDD+, and the blue economy, and its ability to implement GCF's gender and environmental and social policies. While generally compliant, the Panel identified a gap in explicit policy statements regarding Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT), making the re-accreditation conditional upon the formal approval of an AML/CFT policy or the inclusion of consistent statements within its prohibited practices policies.

The GCF Accreditation Panel recommends the re-accreditation of MUFG Bank, Ltd. (MUFG) for a second term, maintaining its status for large-scale projects and high environmental and social risk (Category I-1). While MUFG was found to meet basic and specialized fiduciary standards, as well as gender and evaluation policies, a gap was identified in its institutional grievance redress mechanism (GRM). Re-accreditation is conditional upon MUFG providing evidence of an effective GRM via a link to the Japan Center for Engagement and Remedy on Business and Human Rights (JaCER) on its website. MUFG's portfolio includes three approved activities totaling USD 1,657 million, with one project currently under cancellation due to underperformance. The bank has committed to net zero emissions in its finance portfolio by 2050 and its own operations by 2030.

The report finds that while the South African Parliament possesses sufficient legal powers to oversee the executive, its actual capacity to enforce accountability is weak. This failure is attributed to a political environment that disincentivises scrutiny, inefficient committee processes, inadequate technical and research resourcing, and a lack of capability or commitment among many MPs. The authors distinguish between 'explanatory accountability' (giving reasons), which is routinely performed but often procedurally superficial, and 'amendatory accountability' (remedying defects), which is described as 'barely extant'. Key recommendations include establishing a dedicated committee to oversee the Presidency, reforming the appointment of committee chairs to include more opposition members, and creating a formal system to track and enforce executive compliance with parliamentary resolutions.

The document examines the intersection of gender and climate change, highlighting how gender inequalities shape the differentiated impacts of climatic shocks. It argues that current climate finance is largely 'gender neutral' and fails to integrate gender-responsive strategies due to a lack of understanding of the gender-climate nexus and flawed operational frameworks. The brief specifically calls on public development banks (PDBs) to move beyond 'business as usual' by implementing transformational gender mainstreaming—which addresses root causes of inequality rather than just symptoms—to enhance the effectiveness and sustainability of climate mitigation and adaptation investments.

The Canada Growth Fund (CGF), a $15 billion 'green bank' designed to catalyze private investment for Canada's net-zero transition, will be managed by the Public Sector Pension Investment Board (PSP Investments). The author warns that CGF's success depends on avoiding PSP's 'business as usual' focus on private returns, as CGF must prioritize social returns and accept higher risks through concessional finance. To mitigate the risk of conflating these mandates, the document recommends a transparent investment strategy co-written by policy and finance experts, a diverse decision-making committee with expertise in climate policy and low-carbon technology, and clear accountability structures that separate the Fund's policy goals from PSP's fiduciary duties to pension beneficiaries.

The Canada Growth Fund, a "green bank" designed to catalyze private investment in Canada's transition to net-zero, is managed by the federal Crown corporation PSP Investments. The author warns that the Fund's success depends on its ability to operate with a different risk tolerance and set of objectives than PSP's core pension fund management. While PSP focuses on maximizing returns for beneficiaries, the Canada Growth Fund must use concessional financing to support high-risk, innovative clean growth projects that offer broad societal benefits but may lack immediate private profitability. To mitigate the risk of the Fund's policy goals being eroded by a traditional private-return mindset, the author recommends a transparent investment strategy, a diverse range of expertise in climate policy and technology, and clear accountability mechanisms between the Fund, PSP, and the federal government.

The document examines the intersection of gender and climate finance, highlighting how gender inequalities shape the differentiated impacts of climate change. It argues that while international frameworks like the UNFCCC have increasingly acknowledged gender, climate finance remains largely 'gender neutral' and lacks enforcement mechanisms. The brief identifies significant barriers to gender mainstreaming, including a lack of technical capacity and a tendency to conflate 'gender' with 'women's issues'. It positions public development banks (PDBs) as critical agents for change, recommending they move beyond symptomatic treatments of inequality toward a gender-transformative approach that addresses root causes and power imbalances.

The IAI Science Diplomacy Center (SDC) Advisory Board met in March 2023 to refine the Center's strategic framework and identify flagship activities. The SDC aims to enhance the capacity of IAI member states to address global change through a science diplomacy knowledge hub, regional training for policymakers, and improved science-policy communication. Proposed priority actions include landscape analyses of scientific information flow in government and the development of training courses on negotiation and science diplomacy. The SDC intends to co-design its three-year working plan with member states, utilizing engagement at CoP 31 to ensure initiatives meet regional needs.

The African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) was established in 2003 to promote good governance through peer reviews and National Programmes of Action. While it has expanded to 43 member states and seen a leadership-driven turnaround under CEO Prof Eddy Maloka since 2016, the mechanism faces challenges including slow throughput, delayed publication of reports, and a lack of progress in governance outcomes. Data from the Ibrahim Index of African Governance and Afrobarometer suggest that governance on the continent has remained steady or declined despite the APRM's efforts.