Search Climate Insights Directory

The Climate Bonds Standard & Certification Scheme Assurance Framework outlines the role of Approved Verifiers in certifying bonds as 'low carbon and climate resilient'. It defines a two-phase certification process—pre-issuance and post-issuance—and sets strict competence, insurance, and performance standards for verifiers. Oversight is managed by the Climate Bonds Standard Secretariat, with final certification and verifier approval decisions made by the Climate Bonds Standard Board.

The document outlines a three-tier governance structure for Future Earth consisting of National Committees, Regional Committees, and Regional Centres. It defines the roles, eligibility criteria, and operational functions of these entities to ensure that regional science priorities and stakeholder needs are reflected in the global agenda. The paper identifies five initial world regions and emphasizes the need for flexibility, inclusivity, and transdisciplinary collaboration to implement solution-oriented research for sustainability.

The document identifies five critical areas for designing the HLPF review mechanism: the entities to be reviewed and frequency, the scope of what is reviewed, incentives for voluntary participation, the methodology for national and systemic reviews, and the integration of outputs with other global sustainable development frameworks. It argues that the mechanism should focus on positive learning and scalability rather than finger-pointing, and must assess both goals and the means of implementation together.

The document outlines a strategic approach to air quality management (AQM) specifically for Asian cities, emphasizing the integration of health-based guidelines, clean air implementation plans, and multi-stakeholder governance. It details various policy instruments—ranging from 'command and control' regulations to economic incentives and voluntary agreements—and provides specific strategies for reducing emissions from transport, industry, and area sources. Additionally, it explores the synergies between urban air quality improvements and climate change mitigation, particularly through the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM).

The document outlines a governance framework for achieving climate-resilient development in Africa, stressing that resilience must be mainstreamed into central government planning rather than treated as a separate agenda. It identifies a hierarchy of responsibility where central governments lead coordination, line ministries implement sector-specific policies, and local communities provide essential bottom-up perspectives. A significant portion of the brief focuses on the necessity of transboundary cooperation through Regional Economic Communities (RECs) and River and Lake Basin Organisations (RLBOs) to manage Africa's 53 shared river basins. Finally, it emphasizes that successful implementation depends on engaging non-state actors, including private businesses and civil society, through financial incentives and consultation.

The document outlines a scalable governance model for early-stage alternative local capital providers in Africa, distinguishing between Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs) and Investment Companies (Investcos). It details three core pillars of governance—legal structures and agreements, decision-making bodies, and people, policies, and processes—and provides a phased approach from 'foundational' to 'expanded' measures as funds grow in size and complexity. The framework includes specific checklists for key documents like Limited Partnership Agreements (LPAs) and Investment Policy Manuals, while offering good practice examples from African-focused funds such as First Circle, Catalyst Fund, and Aruwa.

The document outlines the composition, meeting frequency, and leadership structure of the IAI's EDI Committee, specifying its mandate to monitor the Gender, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Policy and establish an Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities Advisory Committee.

The Standing Rules of the Science-Policy Advisory Committee (SPAC) define the governance and operational framework for the committee. The SPAC consists of five members and up to two alternates elected by the Conference of the Parties (CoP). Its primary role is to advise the CoP and the IAI Directorate on the design and use of science for policy and decision-making. The rules detail election processes, meeting frequencies—including monthly joint meetings with the Scientific Advisory Committee—and the requirements for quorum and consensus-based recommendations.

The Standing Rules of the Scientific Advisory Committee (SAC) define the governance and operational framework for the committee. The SAC consists of ten members and up to three alternates elected by the Conference of the Parties from nominations by Parties, the SAC itself, and Institute Associates. The committee is tasked with recommending scientific agendas, directing peer reviews, and assessing scientific results. It meets at least annually and holds monthly joint meetings with the Science-Policy Advisory Committee. Leadership consists of a Chair and Vice-Chair elected for two-year terms, with a quorum requiring an absolute majority of members.

The document details the interim governance and financial arrangements for the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) during its transition period. It specifies the roles of the Conference of the Parties (CoP), the Executive Council (EC), and the Scientific Advisory Committee (SAC), while outlining the temporary responsibilities of the Director pro tempore. Key focus areas include the selection process for the permanent Director, the establishment of financial policies by Deloitte and Touche, and the management of core and program funds through the US National Science Foundation until a formal IAI account is created. The plan aims for the IAI to be fully operational by autumn 1995, including the signing of a Host Country Agreement with Brazil.

The document outlines the legal and operational framework of South African local government, emphasizing the duty of municipalities to provide basic services and improve the lives of citizens, particularly poor households. It describes the three-tier system of government (local, provincial, and national) and the specific categories of municipalities: Metropolitan (Category A), Local (Category B), and District (Category C). The guide details the interaction between the local community, political structures (such as the Council, Mayor, and Speaker), and the municipal administration led by the municipal manager, highlighting the accountability of elected officials to the public.

The GFI Guidance Manual establishes a framework for assessing forest governance by evaluating actors, rules, and practices against five principles of good governance: transparency, participation, accountability, coordination, and capacity. It provides a structured approach to designing assessments, collecting mixed-methods data, and analyzing results across six thematic areas: forest tenure, land use, forest management, forest revenues, cross-cutting institutions, and cross-cutting issues.

The Joint Benefits Authority (JBA) is a proposed governance and finance model based on the Joint Powers Authority (JPA) structure. It aims to overcome the challenges of siloed city departments and tight budgets by pooling resources and using advanced capital planning to deliver multi-purpose, nature-based infrastructure. The JBA focuses on capturing co-benefits, pioneering creative municipal financing, and advancing social equity by prioritizing underserved neighborhoods. The concept is currently being piloted in San Francisco through a partnership between the World Resources Institute, Encourage Capital, the Liquid Assets Project, and the San Francisco Public Utility Commission, with funding from the Kresge Foundation, Spring Point Partners, and the Moore Foundation.

The Stakeholder Engagement Plan (SEP) for the Herencia Colombia (HECO) project outlines a multi-level strategy to involve national government entities, regional environmental authorities, and local communities in the management of 20 million hectares of strategic landscapes. The project focuses on four primary mosaic landscapes: Caribe, Central Andes, Orinoquía Transition, and the Macarena-Chiribiquete corridor, as well as the declaration of new protected areas in the Serranía de San Lucas. It emphasizes the inclusion of indigenous peoples, Afro-descendant communities, and women, while aligning with Colombia's Peace Agreement and National Determined Contributions (NDC). The plan includes a formal Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM) and specific protocols for Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) in ethnic territories.

The report provides a comprehensive framework for implementing electronic monitoring (EM) in industrial tuna fisheries, focusing on the role of Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (RFMOs). It outlines a five-phase implementation process—assessment, program design, pre-implementation, initial implementation, and continuous improvement—and evaluates three governance scenarios: centralized, decentralized/harmonized, and various service provider interaction models. The document emphasizes the transition from technical to performance-based standards to accommodate rapid technological advances in AI and machine learning. It identifies significant gaps in financial transparency and cost-recovery research and recommends the creation of a global EM program database to facilitate data-driven decision-making.

The report outlines the governance needs, implementation phases, and structural scenarios for Electronic Monitoring (EM) in industrial tuna fisheries. It emphasizes the transition toward performance-based standards to accommodate rapid technological evolution in AI and machine learning, while comparing centralized versus decentralized governance models and various service provider engagement strategies.