DOCUMENTO TÉCNICO FUENTE SOBRE LA GOBERNANZA DE LOS SISTEMAS DE MONITOREO ELECTRÓNICO (EM) PARA PESQUERÍAS INDUSTRIALES DE ATÚN

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The report provides a comprehensive framework for implementing electronic monitoring (EM) in industrial tuna fisheries, focusing on the role of Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (RFMOs). It outlines a five-phase implementation process—assessment, program design, pre-implementation, initial implementation, and continuous improvement—and evaluates three governance scenarios: centralized, decentralized/harmonized, and various service provider interaction models. The document emphasizes the transition from technical to performance-based standards to accommodate rapid technological advances in AI and machine learning. It identifies significant gaps in financial transparency and cost-recovery research and recommends the creation of a global EM program database to facilitate data-driven decision-making.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The implementation of EM programs is structured into five distinct phases: Assessment, Program Design, Pre-implementation and Regulatory Alignment, Initial Implementation, and Constant Ordering and Continuous Improvement.
  • The document identifies three primary governance scenarios for EM: Scenario A (Centralized Governance by the RFMO), Scenario B (Decentralized and Harmonized Governance where members implement programs meeting RFMO standards), and Scenario C (various interaction models with EM service providers).
  • The report highlights that financial considerations are the area with the greatest need for additional research due to a lack of transparency in program costs and uncertainty regarding cost-recovery mechanisms.
  • Interoperability remains a challenge in multi-provider programs, with strategies ranging from requiring a single provider's software to using multiple software platforms or establishing a common exchange format.

Cite the original document

APA
Garren, M., Michelin, M., & Maharaj, V. (n.d.). DOCUMENTO TÉCNICO FUENTE SOBRE LA GOBERNANZA DE LOS SISTEMAS DE MONITOREO ELECTRÓNICO (EM) PARA PESQUERÍAS INDUSTRIALES DE ATÚN. WWF International. https://www.worldwildlife.org/documents/750/44csvrxj4q_WWF_DOCUMENTO_TECNICO_FUENTE_SOBRE_EM.pdf
Chicago
Garren, Melissa, Mark Michelin, and Vishwanie Maharaj. DOCUMENTO TÉCNICO FUENTE SOBRE LA GOBERNANZA DE LOS SISTEMAS DE MONITOREO ELECTRÓNICO (EM) PARA PESQUERÍAS INDUSTRIALES DE ATÚN. WWF International, n.d. https://www.worldwildlife.org/documents/750/44csvrxj4q_WWF_DOCUMENTO_TECNICO_FUENTE_SOBRE_EM.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Garren |first1=Melissa |last2=Michelin |first2=Mark |last3=Maharaj |first3=Vishwanie |title=DOCUMENTO TÉCNICO FUENTE SOBRE LA GOBERNANZA DE LOS SISTEMAS DE MONITOREO ELECTRÓNICO (EM) PARA PESQUERÍAS INDUSTRIALES DE ATÚN |publisher=WWF International |url=https://www.worldwildlife.org/documents/750/44csvrxj4q_WWF_DOCUMENTO_TECNICO_FUENTE_SOBRE_EM.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{garrennddocumento, author = {Garren, Melissa and Michelin, Mark and Maharaj, Vishwanie}, title = {{DOCUMENTO TÉCNICO FUENTE SOBRE LA GOBERNANZA DE LOS SISTEMAS DE MONITOREO ELECTRÓNICO (EM) PARA PESQUERÍAS INDUSTRIALES DE ATÚN}}, institution = {WWF International}, url = {https://www.worldwildlife.org/documents/750/44csvrxj4q_WWF_DOCUMENTO_TECNICO_FUENTE_SOBRE_EM.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated