Search Climate Insights Directory

The document details WWF and Delterra's pilot projects in Jayapura and Merauke, Papua, which established that households are the primary source of food waste and that significant portions of discarded food remain edible. It identifies a 'missing middle' financing gap for infrastructure investments (typically $1–3 million) and proposes a three-phased approach—starting with prevention, moving to community-scale recovery, and ending with centralized facilities—to align with the waste hierarchy and reduce methane emissions.

The document examines food waste in Jayapura and Merauke, Indonesia, finding that households are the primary waste generators and that significant portions of discarded food remain edible. It highlights a 'missing middle' financing gap for infrastructure investments (USD 1-3 million) and proposes a three-phase roadmap: starting with prevention and reduction, moving to community-scale recycling (composting and Black Soldier Fly larvae), and finally investing in centralized waste management facilities.

Using Google Search data, the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication identifies that interest in climate change in the United States follows predictable cycles tied to Earth Day and the school year, as well as spikes driven by extreme weather. While heatwaves trigger nationwide interest, events like wildfires produce more localized spikes based on geographic exposure, such as the 2023 Canadian wildfires affecting the American Northeast. The authors argue that these trends can be used by decision-makers to time communications on risk, adaptation, and the transition to renewable energy when public awareness is highest.

The research examines the effectiveness of workplace campaigns and carbon footprint calculators in driving pro-environmental habit changes among employees. While such campaigns can successfully reduce carbon footprints through social support and leadership, their impact is often limited by technical issues with calculators and a failure to target specific current practices or foster a strong sense of community.

The document analyzes the relationship between human emotions and climate action, highlighting that while different emotions trigger different policy preferences, negative emotions like fear and distress can be powerful motivators when paired with a sense of personal threat and collective efficacy. Key findings include the link between guilt and support for personally costly policies in the US, the role of identity-linked threats to the Great Barrier Reef in driving personal energy reduction in Australia, and the influence of personal threat perception on electric vehicle adoption in India.

The document examines how collusive corruption—where officials and private individuals collaborate to violate rules—undermines community-based natural resource management (CBNRM). Using a hypothetical scenario based on timber auction rigging in Nepal, it illustrates how sawmill owners, contractors, local politicians, and forest officials form networks of mutual support and reciprocity to defraud communities. To counter this, the guide proposes behavioral science interventions: addressing 'present bias' by monetizing long-term losses, using 'salience bias' to make illegal logging impacts more emotionally resonant, and challenging the perception that informal payments are not corruption. It recommends cultivating 'champions' among youth and integrity-driven community members, providing incentives for honest law enforcement, and transitioning brokers into certified service providers. The guide concludes with a framework for prevention and persuasion at both individual and institutional levels.

The document examines how collusive corruption—where public officials and private individuals collaborate to violate rules—threatens community-based natural resource management (CBNRM). Using a hypothetical scenario based on timber auction rigging in Nepal, it maps the motivations of sawmill owners, contractors, political leaders, and forestry officials. To counter this, the guide proposes behavioral science interventions to address 'present bias' and 'salience bias' among community members, challenge the normalization of bribery, and create incentives for integrity among officials and private sector actors.

The report identifies a significant 'attitude-behavior gap' in U.S. political climate action, where many adults express willingness to act but few do so. It highlights that those who are both willing and active possess stronger collective efficacy beliefs, more frequent communication about climate change, and a higher perception of supportive social norms. To bridge this gap, the authors recommend direct interpersonal requests, simplifying the process of engagement, and amplifying diverse pro-climate social norms.

The briefing discusses the gap between climate concern and action among Americans, identifying a lack of training and confidence as primary barriers. It highlights a framework for individual action across six domains—food, home energy, transport, shopping, influence, and citizenship—and argues that individual choices create ripple effects by normalizing low-carbon lifestyles, improving climate literacy, and sending market signals to businesses.

The report finds that low-cost, repeated behaviors like reducing food waste are significantly more common than high-cost, one-time installations like heat pumps or solar panels. While many who adopted these behaviors faced minimal difficulty, non-adopters cited lack of awareness and lack of interest for low-cost actions, and high cost and home ownership issues for high-cost technologies.

The research examines soy farmers in the Matopiba region of Brazil, finding that land-use decisions are driven by economic rationale and a sense of entitlement to clear land. The authors argue that voluntary behavioral changes are unlikely to succeed and that strict regulatory enforcement and supply-chain requirements for conversion-free soy are necessary to prevent the total loss of the Cerrado.

The authors analyze transportation data from the Netherlands, Sweden, and the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic, specifically focusing on the shift toward working from home. By applying the Opportunity, Motivation Behaviour (COM-B) model and a concept map, the paper explores how these behavioral changes impact carbon emissions and suggests that policy-makers can leverage these shifts to support long-term climate mitigation goals aligned with the Paris Agreement.

The study finds that while most Americans support preparedness regardless of terminology, using "extreme weather" generally yields higher or equal support for personal actions and infrastructure policies compared to "climate change," particularly among conservatives. Conversely, liberals are more likely to support collective preparedness actions when "climate change" is used. The authors conclude that "extreme weather" is a safer term for engaging conservatives, while "climate change" can be beneficial for engaging liberals.

The report analyzes climate activism in the U.S. using the 'Six Americas' framework, finding that while many Americans—particularly those in the 'Alarmed' segment—express a willingness to participate in climate campaigns and political actions, actual participation rates remain low. Consumer activism, such as rewarding or punishing companies based on their climate records, is more common than direct political advocacy. The study also notes a trend toward increased alarm regarding global warming over a five-year period and highlights that perceived collective efficacy is higher for local than for national decision-makers.

The report finds that an estimated 6.8% of Chinese outbound travelers purchase ivory while abroad, with Thailand, Japan, and Hong Kong SAR being the most popular destinations. Mail is the most common method for transporting these products back to Mainland China. While most travelers recognize the illegality of cross-border transport, many are misled by local guides and sellers who suggest that small items are safe to carry. The study highlights a specific 'planner' segment—typically high-income, highly educated females—who intentionally seek out ivory markets.

The document examines the relationship between gender and climate-related food choices in the US, finding that women generally have higher risk perceptions and a greater willingness to adopt plant-based diets and reduce food waste than men, though they also report more uncertainty regarding specific dietary impacts on global warming.

The report finds that while education levels influence the types of questions people have about climate change and their initial perceptions of NASA, the NASA climate change website is accessible to all education levels and effectively improves perceptions of NASA's competency and trust, particularly for those with less formal education. While the website did not eliminate pre-existing knowledge gaps, it helped less-educated visitors learn more and increased their certainty regarding the reality and impacts of climate change.

The document outlines a communication strategy for discussing climate change with friends and family, emphasizing the importance of targeting moderate individuals, finding shared values, and focusing on scientific consensus and hope rather than alarmism to motivate action.

The report finds that Americans are more likely to engage in consumer activism than political activism to address global warming, though many underestimate its effectiveness. While consumers often rely on individual purchasing decisions, the text argues that public communication and bad publicity are more effective at changing corporate practices than sales decreases alone.

The report analyzes 'Global Warming's Six Americas'—the Alarmed, Concerned, Cautious, Disengaged, Doubtful, and Dismissive—to determine if moral appeals from religious leaders could engage those currently unconcerned about climate change. It finds that while most Americans value caring for the poor and the environment, few outside the Alarmed and Concerned segments currently view global warming as a moral issue or understand its link to poverty. However, a widespread belief in human stewardship of nature and a general preference for religious over scientific explanations among less-engaged groups suggest that moral framing may be an effective communication strategy.