Search Climate Insights Directory

The document details WWF and Delterra's pilot projects in Jayapura and Merauke, Papua, which established that households are the primary source of food waste and that significant portions of discarded food remain edible. It identifies a 'missing middle' financing gap for infrastructure investments (typically $1–3 million) and proposes a three-phased approach—starting with prevention, moving to community-scale recovery, and ending with centralized facilities—to align with the waste hierarchy and reduce methane emissions.

The document examines food waste in Jayapura and Merauke, Indonesia, finding that households are the primary waste generators and that significant portions of discarded food remain edible. It highlights a 'missing middle' financing gap for infrastructure investments (USD 1-3 million) and proposes a three-phase roadmap: starting with prevention and reduction, moving to community-scale recycling (composting and Black Soldier Fly larvae), and finally investing in centralized waste management facilities.

WRI Indonesia collaborated with local partners and government bodies to map 300,000 hectares of customary forests in Papua, resulting in the issuance of six customary forest certificates in Jayapura Regency to protect Indigenous land rights and biodiversity.

The report argues that existing village development indices in Indonesia fail to adequately measure or reward environmental performance. To address this, the Climate Policy Initiative (CPI) proposes the Indeks Desa Membangun Plus (IDM+), which adds 10 ecological indicators to the existing Indeks Desa Membangun (IDM). The report suggests using IDM+ as a basis for Ecological Fiscal Transfers (EFT), specifically through a mixed fiscal instrument approach in Berau Regency, East Kalimantan. This approach combines performance-based incentives via the Alokasi Dana Desa (ADD) with affirmative action funding for low-performing villages, potentially utilizing untapped reforestation funds (DBH DR).

The document argues that existing village-level evaluation tools in Indonesia, such as the IDM and IPD, are inadequate for measuring environmental performance and mainstreaming Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). To address this, the Climate Policy Initiative (CPI) proposes the Sustainable Village Development Index (IDM+), which adds 10 ecological indicators covering land-use, natural resource management, and climate actions to the existing index. Using Berau District in East Kalimantan as a case study, the paper demonstrates how IDM+ can be linked to fiscal instruments like Village Fund Allocation (ADD) and Financial Assistance (Bantuan Keuangan Kabupaten) to reward high-performing villages while providing affirmative support to low-performing ones. The author recommends that the central government incorporate IDM+ into the national IDM and that local governments ensure transparent implementation and capacity building.

The report argues that existing village-level evaluation tools in Indonesia, such as the Village Development Index (IDM), are inadequate for measuring and rewarding environmental sustainability. To address this, the Climate Policy Initiative (CPI) proposes the 'IDM+', which adds 10 ecological indicators covering land-use, natural resource management, and climate actions. Using Berau Regency in East Kalimantan as a case study, the report demonstrates how this index can underpin Ecological Fiscal Transfers (EFTs) to reward high-performing villages. It recommends a mixed fiscal approach—combining reformulated Village Fund Allocations (ADD) with targeted financial assistance—to incentivize green growth while supporting low-performing villages.