Search Climate Insights Directory

The Institute for Economic Justice and partner organisations advocate for transitioning the Social Relief of Distress (SRD) grant into a permanent universal basic income guarantee (Ubig) in South Africa. They argue that a Ubig is fiscally feasible through progressive taxation and would act as an economic stimulus by boosting local consumption and productivity. The authors call for the grant's value to be increased to at least the Food Poverty Line and eventually the upper bound poverty line (approximately R1,500), urging the presidency to establish a high-level review to implement this transition.

A coalition of organizations advocates for Colorado's Air Quality Control Commission to adopt clean truck rules to mitigate the health impacts of diesel pollution in marginalized communities, specifically those along the I-70 corridor.

The document examines the 'digital divide' and the rise of 'surveillance capitalism,' arguing that digital technologies often reinforce existing social, racial, and gender inequalities. It calls for the creation of 'democratic public communication spaces' that prioritize human dignity over corporate profit and proposes global regulations to ensure digital justice and the protection of communication as a basic human right.

The document argues that digital justice is an extension of social and ecological justice, requiring a multi-dimensional approach to address the digital divide, surveillance, and the weaponization of information. It emphasizes that communication is a fundamental human right and calls for a faith-inspired movement to resist the concentration of power in tech monopolies and state surveillance. The guide highlights specific vulnerabilities of women, ethnic minorities, and disabled persons, while linking digital consumption to environmental degradation through electronic waste and energy use.

WWF advocates for a nature-positive transition to offshore renewable energy, emphasizing the need to balance the projected sevenfold increase in offshore wind capacity by 2030 with the protection of seabed habitats, fisheries, and local communities. The organization works with developers to adopt frameworks like the Science-Based Targets for Nature and the Task Force on Nature-related Financial Disclosures, while urging financial institutions to use their leverage to fund innovative, nature-positive strategies in line with the Paris Agreement.

The document highlights that the blue economy is valued at US$24 trillion, but faces potential losses of up to US$8.4 trillion over 15 years due to mismanagement. WWF advocates for shifting mainstream finance away from harmful activities and toward sustainable investments in seafood, marine renewables, coastal development, and shipping. The approach emphasizes moving beyond short-term philanthropy toward innovative public and private capital mechanisms, such as Project Finance for Permanence (PFP), to support nature-positive business models.

GreenLatinos advocates for the immediate passage of the Build Back Better Act (BBBA), arguing that the legislation is essential for providing climate justice, clean energy infrastructure, and water security to disproportionately affected Latino and Indigenous communities. The organization specifically calls on Senator Joe Manchin and Colorado Senators Hickenlooper and Bennett to support the bill's provisions on coastal restoration, lead removal from drinking water, and sustainable transportation.

Carbon Market Watch and signatory organisations argue that the European Commission's proposal for the EU ETS revision fails to apply the 'polluter pays principle' by continuing free pollution permits. They contend that free allocations have stagnated industrial decarbonisation, noting that over 200 billion euros in allowances have been distributed since 2008 while emissions reductions remained below 0.4% annually since 2013. The document calls for full auctioning of allowances to internalise carbon costs and generate revenue for clean technology, warning that the Commission's plan for 5 billion free allowances between 2021 and 2030 could represent a subsidy of approximately 400 billion euros at current prices.

ClientEarth argues that UK auditors are systemically failing to apply existing accounting and audit standards to climate-related financial risks. Citing the FRC's own 2020 Climate Thematic Review and a report by Carbon Tracker and the Carbon Accounting Project, the letter claims that auditors frequently ignore climate-sensitive assumptions and fail to ensure financial statements are Paris-aligned. ClientEarth calls on the FRC to move beyond monitoring and take meaningful enforcement action, including public investigations into the 'big four' firms (EY, Deloitte, KPMG, and PwC) and stricter oversight of Recognised Supervisory Bodies (RSBs).

The report provides evidence of methane emissions at 180 out of over 250 oil and gas sites visited across 11 European countries. It highlights a current lack of EU-wide policy and common standards for addressing venting, flaring, and fugitive emissions. The author suggests that as the world's largest fossil fuel importer, the EU could drive global methane mitigation by setting stringent standards for imports.

The document argues that the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA), 1999, is outdated and fails to address current environmental and health threats, such as the climate emergency and plastic pollution. It highlights the disproportionate impact of toxics on marginalized groups, including Indigenous people and lower-income Canadians, and calls for the implementation of 87 recommendations made by the House of Commons Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development in 2017. The authors advocate for specific amendments to Bill C-28, including the recognition of a human right to a healthy environment, the prohibition of carcinogenic and mutagenic substances, and the establishment of a presumption of non-confidentiality regarding chemical substances.

GreenLatinos supports the Bipartisan Infrastructure Framework for its investments in public transit, lead pipe replacement, and electric grid modernization, while calling for the immediate passage of the Build Back Better Act to address the climate crisis and protect frontline Latino communities.

The We Mean Business Coalition asserts that while COP26 has seen increased ambition, current national pledges and methane commitments may only limit warming to 1.8°C. The coalition emphasizes the need for clear reporting frameworks and a data-driven Global Stocktake in 2023 to track progress and inform future national targets. It highlights that corporate action, such as the 25% emissions reduction by 338 companies with science-based targets, can provide governments with the confidence to accelerate decarbonization.

A coalition of environmental organizations, including Reclaim Finance and Greenpeace France, urges AXA to align its energy policy with the IEA's Net Zero Emissions scenario by stopping the underwriting of new fossil fuel exploration and infrastructure. The letter argues that AXA, as a leader in the Net-Zero Insurance Alliance and a pioneer in coal divestment, must now phase out support for oil and gas expansion to maintain its climate credibility and shareholder value.

A coalition of environmental organizations, including Reclaim Finance and Greenpeace, is urging AXA to end its insurance services for new oil and gas production and transportation infrastructure. The letter argues that AXA, as a leader in the insurance industry and chair of the Net-Zero Insurance Alliance, should follow the International Energy Agency's (IEA) 2021 World Energy Outlook, which states that no new fossil fuel exploration or fields are required for a net-zero scenario. The authors highlight AXA's previous leadership in divesting from coal and suggest that a similar exit from oil and gas would benefit both the climate and the company's shareholder value.

The Life After Coal campaign calls for South Africa to adhere to the lower bound of its updated NDC (350 to 420 Mt CO2eq) to align with the 1.5°C pathway. This requires cancelling all new coal and gas projects, accelerating the retirement of the coal fleet to reach zero fossil fuels in electricity by 2040, and building at least 4 GW of renewable capacity annually. The campaign also advocates for a just transition that prioritizes workers and communities and urges South Africa to lead at COP26 in demanding increased finance for adaptation and loss and damage from wealthy nations.

The document argues that EU methane legislation must cover the entire supply chain, including imports, to be effective and consistent with climate goals.

Reclaim Finance calls on AXA to cease providing insurance for the Brunsbüttel LNG terminal and other new fossil fuel projects. The organization argues that such infrastructure facilitates the import of shale gas, contradicts AXA's leadership in the Net Zero Insurance Alliance, and ignores calls from the French Ministry of Economy to exit non-conventional oil and gas sectors.

A coalition of NGOs, including Reclaim Finance and Urgewald, wrote to the CEOs of ten insurance companies (including Allianz, AXA, and Munich Re) demanding they stop insuring the Brunsbüttel LNG terminal in northern Germany. The authors argue that the project, promoted by Gasunie, will lock in greenhouse gas emissions for 30–50 years, contradicting the 1.5°C goal and risking the creation of a stranded asset. They highlight that the project costs €450 million, with up to €100 million from German taxpayers, and faces significant opposition from environmental groups and market analysts.

The document argues that expanding the Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ) is essential to combat illegal nitrogen dioxide (NO2) levels in London, which are nearly twice the legal limit. It details the expansion's scope, the specific vehicle emission standards required to avoid charges, and the projected health benefits, including the avoidance of 250,000 new cases of air pollution-related disease. The guide highlights that road transport, particularly diesel cars, is the primary source of NO2 pollution and emphasizes that low-income and minority communities are disproportionately affected by poor air quality. It also advocates for further measures, such as expanding the ULEZ to all of Greater London and adopting stricter World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines for particulate matter (PM2.5).