Search Climate Insights Directory

The document outlines how climate change acts as a public health threat in Canada, increasing healthcare costs and deaths. It highlights that vulnerability is driven by social determinants—exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity—and argues that governments must invest in both emergency response and the reduction of underlying social inequalities to mitigate these risks.

The document details a technical framework for climate impact assessments in British Columbia, focusing on the selection of General Circulation Models (GCMs) and the quantification of heat-related health and labour risks. It establishes a process for downscaling climate data to 111 population centres and applies exposure-response functions to estimate unexpected deaths, hospitalisations, and lost labour hours. The text also outlines several proactive adaptation scenarios—including increased air conditioning adoption, window shading, urban planning, and shifted work hours—and the economic metrics used to conduct cost-benefit analyses for these interventions.

Climate change poses a significant threat to public health in Canada, with costs expected to increase as impacts intensify. Vulnerability is driven by social determinants—exposure, sensitivity, and capacity to adapt—meaning the impacts will not be felt equally across the population. Projected annual costs by the end of the century vary by emissions scenario, with heat-related productivity losses and deaths representing major financial burdens. Effective adaptation requires both treating immediate symptoms through emergency response and addressing root causes like economic inequity and food insecurity.

Human-caused warming increases atmospheric thirst, leading to higher evaporation and transpiration, which worsens droughts globally and specifically in the western U.S. In the southwestern U.S., the 2000-2021 megadrought was the most severe in 1,200 years, with over 40% of its severity attributed to climate change. The western U.S. faces increasing risks of hydrological drought from declining snowpack and compound events involving heat, drought, and wildfires, which caused over $38 billion in damages during 2020-2021.

The document details how rising temperatures and more frequent heat waves in the U.S. disproportionately affect children's health and development. It highlights physiological vulnerabilities, the impact of urban heat islands on marginalized communities, and provides guidance for caregivers to mitigate heat-related illnesses.

The Climate Smart Shrimp Fund (CSSF) is a financial mechanism designed to help shrimp farmers increase production efficiency and climate resilience while restoring mangrove ecosystems. The fund consists of a technical assistance facility for training and certification and a revolving debt facility for infrastructure upgrades. Following pilot programs in Indonesia, Ecuador, and the Philippines, the fund seeks various forms of capital, including grants and equity, to scale its operations.

The report identifies four primary loopholes in the proposed 2030 Effort Sharing Decision (ESD) that could undermine the EU's climate goals. These include the use of land use offsets (LULUCF), the inflation of carbon budgets based on 2020 targets, the use of surplus EU ETS allowances, and the carry-over of unused carbon permits ('hot air'). Collectively, these loopholes could result in the EU emitting 4.7 billion tonnes more CO2-equivalent than pledged, potentially allowing emissions to increase rather than decrease between 2021 and 2030.

The guide equips National Park Service (NPS) staff to communicate climate change by segmenting the American public into six audience types based on their beliefs and motivations. It provides tailored communication tips for each group—ranging from the 'Alarmed' to the 'Dismissive'—and details specific climate impacts across ten U.S. bioregions to help staff create place-based narratives. The document emphasizes using local park stories and scientific consensus to motivate visitors toward climate action and energy conservation.

Black carbon (BC), or soot, is a potent short-lived climate pollutant resulting from incomplete combustion of fossil fuels and biomass. It causes significant respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, contributing to millions of excess deaths annually, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Economically, BC exposure and reliance on unclean cooking fuels cause trillions of dollars in losses. Climatically, BC warms the atmosphere by absorbing solar energy and accelerates ice melt in the Arctic and Himalayas by reducing albedo. The report argues that reducing BC emissions—especially through clean cooking fuels in sub-Saharan Africa and transportation improvements in urban areas—would prevent millions of premature deaths, reduce deforestation, and help limit global warming to 1.5°C.

The document argues that adopting the ACT rule is essential for New York to meet its climate goals under the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act (CLCPA) and to address severe public health disparities caused by diesel emissions. It highlights that medium- and heavy-duty vehicles (MHDVs) are a primary source of greenhouse gases and toxic air pollutants, particularly in communities of color. The authors assert that zero-emission MHDVs are technically viable and cost-effective, projecting that the rule would add over 228,000 zero-emission vehicles by 2050 and generate $1.9 billion in net societal benefits. The statement recommends strengthening the rule by limiting early crediting to one year and lowering the fleet reporting threshold to five vehicles to better identify pollution hot spots and address labor misclassification.

The document outlines the environmental and economic benefits of energy efficiency in Alabama, specifically highlighting how policies like energy service contracts and building codes can help the state meet carbon reduction goals and save residents money by 2030.

The document outlines the economic and environmental benefits of energy efficiency in Arizona, stating that specific policies could save the state $4.2 billion and avoid 15 million tons of CO2 by 2030.

The document outlines the economic and environmental benefits of energy efficiency in Florida, asserting that specific policies could save the state $392 million and avoid 18 million tons of CO2 by 2030.

The document outlines the economic and environmental benefits of energy efficiency in Illinois, asserting that specific policies can help the state meet 83% of its carbon reduction goals under the EPA's Clean Power Plan. It projects that by 2030, a combination of 1.5% annual energy savings, national model building codes, and 500 MWs of new combined heat and power would avoid over 29 million tons of CO2 and save Illinoisans $5.4 billion.

The document outlines the economic and environmental benefits of energy efficiency in Mississippi, asserting that specific policies could save the state $873 million and avoid 2.6 million tons of CO2 by 2030.

The document outlines the environmental and economic benefits of energy efficiency in North Carolina, specifically highlighting how targeted policies can help the state meet federal air regulations and save residents money.

The document outlines the economic and environmental benefits of energy efficiency in Nevada, stating that achieving annual energy savings of 1% could avoid 2.6 million tons of CO2 and save residents $466 million by 2030.

The fact sheet outlines the economic and environmental benefits of energy efficiency in Ohio, asserting that specific policies could help the state meet 78% of its carbon pollution goals under the EPA's Clean Power Plan and save residents $7.4 billion by 2030.

The fact sheet outlines the potential environmental and economic benefits of energy efficiency in South Dakota, asserting that specific policies could help the state meet its carbon reduction goals under the EPA's Clean Power Plan while saving residents money.

The document outlines the economic and environmental benefits of energy efficiency in Tennessee, asserting that specific policies can help the state meet carbon pollution goals and save residents money.