Search Climate Insights Directory

The document distinguishes energy system resilience—the ability to maintain critical services during disasters—from reliability, which concerns day-to-day grid performance. It argues that aging infrastructure, volatile weather, and increasing demand necessitate a shift toward decentralized, renewable energy systems. A primary recommendation is the creation of 'resilience hubs': trusted community spaces powered by clean energy microgrids and energy efficiency measures that provide essential services during crises. The guide suggests scaling these efforts through collaborative funding, updated building codes, the use of electric vehicles as mobile batteries, and partnerships with insurers to incentivize resilient construction.

FERC has ordered six regional grid operators (PJM, MISO, SPP, CAISO, ISO-NE, and NYISO) to update their tariffs to address challenges posed by rising load growth from large energy users, such as data centers. The orders focus on five reform categories: standardizing interconnection applications and study processes, preventing cost shifting through increased transparency and cost recovery agreements, establishing rules for co-location and behind-the-meter generation, creating new transmission service types for flexible loads, and developing study processes for electrically proximate generation. The document outlines a strict timeline for RTO/ISO responses and filings, starting in July 2026.

The guide describes advance market commitments (AMCs) as financial mechanisms where governments or private entities guarantee the purchase of a future product to stimulate development and reduce investor risk. It outlines the essential steps for designing an AMC, including defining market boundaries, identifying eligible suppliers and buyers, and establishing standards and procurement processes. The text highlights the utility of AMCs for sectors like aviation, buildings, hydrogen, and carbon dioxide removal, while noting that they should be complemented by other policies to address infrastructure gaps.

The document examines the evolving role of the insurance sector from merely absorbing financial losses to actively supporting the adoption of resilience solutions. It contends that there is a gap between public expectations and the operational constraints of insurance markets, suggesting that a recalibration of these roles is necessary to achieve practical resilience outcomes.

Small island nations face unique hurdles in managing end-of-life (EOL) electric vehicle batteries, including a lack of specialized workforces, space constraints, and the inability to achieve economies of scale. The report highlights that while large markets benefit from established recycling networks, islands must navigate complex international regulations, such as the Basel Convention and IMO's IMDG Code, to export waste. It suggests a phased approach—utilizing off-island export in the short term and investing in local shredding infrastructure as volumes grow—citing Bermuda's proactive national strategy as a viable model for other remote regions.

The document describes the traditional centralized electricity grid model, which has been the global default since 1882, and explains how it functions through generation, transmission, and distribution. It notes that while this model was historically cost-effective, aging infrastructure and extreme weather now necessitate a shift toward distributed energy resources (DERs) to enhance system resilience.

Despite the removal of federal tax credits for clean energy upgrades via the One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025, residential clean technologies in the US continue to offer significant greenhouse gas emissions reductions and cost savings. Using the Green Upgrade Calculator, RMI found that electric vehicles (EVs) generally lead in emissions reductions and cost savings in the West, while air-source heat pumps (ASHPs) are most effective for emissions in the Northeast and Midwest and for savings in the South. Rooftop solar provides the highest emissions impact in Hawaii and leads in cost savings in California, Florida, and the Northeast due to high electricity prices and sunlight. The report emphasizes that the most effective state and local programs will target specific household archetypes—such as high-mileage drivers for EVs or delivered-fuel users for ASHPs—and bundle technologies to maximize synergy and savings.

The document analyzes four case studies of 'electrification-friendly' electric rates in Massachusetts, Minnesota, Maine, and Maryland. It finds that rates specifically designed for heat pump users or those with significant seasonal differentiation provide the greatest bill savings. The analysis emphasizes that automatic enrollment strategies are more effective at reaching customers than optional opt-in rates.

The briefing advocates for a "soft energy path" based on efficiency and design rather than increasing energy supply. It argues that current anxieties over AI electricity demand and critical mineral shortages can be addressed through demand flexibility, efficiency, and system optimization rather than building more power plants and mines.

The document argues that curbside charging is a critical alternative for renters and multifamily housing residents who lack private off-street parking. It emphasizes that successful deployment requires early engagement with 'program stakeholders' (government and private entities) and 'community stakeholders' (residents and local organizations) to navigate the complexities of urban infrastructure. The guide outlines four business models—'own and operate', 'lease', 'external operator', and 'concession'—noting that the choice depends on whether the city prioritizes program control, financial risk mitigation, or specific goals like addressing 'EV charging deserts'. It also suggests community engagement tools such as surveys, pop-ups, and dedicated websites to build trust and correct EV misconceptions.

The guide outlines ten ways US cities can advance electric mobility through permitting reform, building codes, targeted public charging, and shared e-mobility services to ensure an equitable transition.

The report examines the evolution of policy frameworks, taxonomies, and financial instruments across major Asian economies, categorizing them into international financial hubs, industrialized powerhouses, and rapidly developing economies to analyze their complementary roles in the regional transition finance landscape.

RMI advocates for the reassessment of planned coal-fired power plants, particularly in low-and-middle-income countries, given the falling costs of renewables and storage. The briefing provides a framework for identifying candidate plants for reconsideration based on their conception date, sunk costs, and evolving grid needs, suggesting that solar paired with battery energy storage (BESS) often offers a more competitive levelized cost of energy (LCOE) than new ultra-supercritical coal plants.

The document argues that rapid declines in clean energy costs and evolving grid needs make many planned coal plants economically risky. It introduces a five-indicator framework to identify high-priority candidates for reconsideration and suggests a phased approach to transitioning these projects to alternatives like solar paired with battery energy storage systems (BESS).

The waste sector contributes approximately 20% of global human-caused methane emissions, yet adoption of proven technologies like anaerobic digestion and landfill gas to energy remains slow in emerging economies due to a lack of bankable projects. RMI identifies São Paulo and Bangkok as prime opportunity hubs for near-term private investment. Scaling this finance requires de-risking through investment-ready project pipelines, concessional capital, grant funding, and strengthened carbon markets to improve returns.

The report argues that many planned coal plants in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are candidates for reconsideration due to declining costs of solar and battery storage, evolving grid needs, and the risk of long-term financial lock-in. It introduces a five-indicator framework—fuel source, initiation date, sunk costs, designed grid role, and evolution of grid needs—to prioritize plants for reevaluation. RMI's analysis suggests that solar paired with battery energy storage systems (BESS) is increasingly cost-competitive with new ultra-supercritical coal, potentially offering a more affordable and flexible alternative for modernizing grids.

The report examines how wastewater treatment plants can be transformed into carbon removal hubs by managing alkalinity and repurposing biosolids. It identifies two primary intervention categories: alkalinity management (including Wastewater Alkalinity Enhancement and Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement) and biosolids management (including biomass burial, biochar, supercritical water oxidation, and incineration with CCS). The document highlights synergies such as the safe destruction of PFAS and the use of existing pumping infrastructure to reduce capital and energy costs. Globally, the biogenic carbon in municipal wastewater represents a theoretical removal potential of 120–460 MtCO2 per year, though current treatment rates limit this to 70–260 MtCO2. Key barriers to scale include feedstock supply chain development, quantification challenges for carbon credits, and ecological risks.

The document outlines the role of EV carshare in addressing urban mobility, affordability, and air quality. It compares three primary business models—cooperative, for-profit, and nonprofit—and details operational considerations such as site selection, reservation structures, and the critical challenge of insurance. It highlights the potential for EV carshare to reduce private vehicle ownership and development costs, citing a specific example from Austin, Texas, where parking requirement reductions saved $38.5 million in housing costs. The guide emphasizes the need for strategic partnerships, diversified revenue streams, and iterative program design to ensure long-term financial viability and equitable access.

The report argues that traditional conservative utility planning, which bases connection decisions on worst-case load scenarios, creates lengthy delays for electric truck charging sites. Flexible service connections (FSCs) offer an alternative where customers agree to limit charging during peak hours to ensure grid safety, reducing energization timelines from years to months. RMI's analysis of Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) and National Grid data shows that FSCs are most effective on feeders with sharp, narrow late-afternoon peaks, typically near large population centers. In PG&E territory, just four hours of load shifting could theoretically support more medium- and heavy-duty electric vehicles than have been sold to date in California. The report highlights the role of managed charging and on-site battery storage in making FSCs operationally viable for fleets and calls for regulators to standardize these offerings.

Virtual power plants (VPPs) are reaching scales that rival traditional power plants, with some programs exceeding 1 GW. Despite this, the document finds that utilities often fail to properly model VPPs in integrated resource plans (IRPs) and distribution system plans (DSPs), frequently treating them as fixed load adjustments rather than selectable resources. This planning gap leads to an underestimation of VPP value and a risk of redundant infrastructure investment. The author recommends that regulators and utilities develop detailed resource attributes for VPPs, allow for their growth in models, and evaluate their benefits across both bulk power and distribution systems.