Search Climate Insights Directory

This research paper evaluates the role and effectiveness of international development partners in financing climate mitigation and adaptation within Indonesia's land use sectors. It analyzes finance flows from 2011, identifying a heavy reliance on grants and a focus on capacity building, while noting that international contributions are significantly smaller than domestic funding.

The San Giorgio Group (SGG) met in February 2016 to discuss moving climate finance from diplomacy to implementation following the Paris Agreement. Key discussions focused on the need for better tracking methodologies for the USD 100 billion goal, the role of cities in climate action, the use of climate risk insurance in vulnerable countries, and the application of innovative financial instruments like green bonds and YieldCos to scale up Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs).

The report analyzes international climate finance for land use in Indonesia, finding that while international support is well-targeted toward building 'enabling environments' (capacity building and policy), it is significantly smaller than domestic funding and often bypasses local government institutions. The authors recommend longer project durations, better coordination through a centralized government database, and capacity building for local organizations to access international funds directly.

The fact sheet highlights the systemic instability of rural property rights in Brazil, noting that the country ranks 76th out of 129 countries in property rights security. It links this uncertainty to increased deforestation, as clearing forest is used to prove land productivity to avoid expropriation. The document also connects land disputes to violence, citing 770 land-related homicides between 1994 and 2015 and Brazil's position as a global leader in murders of environmental and land rights activists. Institutional failures contributing to the problem include a lack of georeferencing before 2004, poor integration between the 11 federal agencies managing property rights, and the prevalence of 'grilagem' (land grabbing), with suspected grilagem affecting 23% of the state of Pará.

This report analyzes the financing of coal power in China, finding that state-owned enterprises (SOEs) dominate the sector and have become financially self-sustaining. While government policies, low-cost debt, and specific tariff structures initially drove aggressive expansion, SOEs now generate sufficient revenue from depreciation expenses to fund coal capital expenditures independently of external finance or policy support.

The author asserts that the Paris agreement's success is rooted in the collapsing cost gap between clean and fossil energy and the increasing profitability of low-carbon investments. The text highlights that private sector investment is driving climate finance, which grew 18% to $391 billion in the previous year. Specific examples are provided of economic opportunities in the U.S., Europe, India, China, Indonesia, and Brazil, suggesting that the transition to low-carbon energy and sustainable agriculture can unlock trillions in economic value.

This briefing outlines the Climate Policy Initiative's (CPI) framework for evaluating the efficiency of public financial interventions, such as green banks, in supporting the transition to a low-carbon economy. It focuses on identifying financial barriers and determining the most effective risk-bearing mechanisms and implementing institutions to address them.

The paper analyzes infrastructure finance in Brazil and India, finding that despite different structural models—Brazil's centralized development bank approach versus India's decentralized system—both remain dominated by public financing and lack the financial innovation seen in developed economies. It concludes that policy environments, such as Brazil's integrated regulatory and banking systems, are more influential than the finance models themselves, though centralized models demonstrate a greater ability to achieve scale and meet national policy targets.

The report finds that Indonesia's current tax system does not incentivize sustainable land use in the palm oil industry, characterized by low tax-to-GDP ratios and minimal revenue redistribution to local governments. It proposes six fiscal reforms, including increasing land taxes and tying revenue sharing to sustainability indicators, to reduce deforestation and improve land productivity.

The report analyzes Indonesia's land-use revenue systems, finding that 93.5% of revenue is based on production rather than land size, which fails to disincentivize land expansion. It identifies high-potential areas for reform, including the Land and Building Tax, Forestry Non-Tax Revenue, and the use of Adjustment Funds for earmarking sustainable land use activities. The analysis also highlights how current central-to-regional revenue sharing may perversely encourage local governments to grant more land permits to increase their budgets.

The report outlines a systematic approach to identifying and addressing financial barriers to low-carbon investment. It proposes an analysis matrix that intersects various financial stakeholders with specific barriers—such as high cost of capital, perceived risk, and split incentives—to determine where public intervention is most effective. The authors argue that dedicated institutions like green banks can be advantageous by co-housing policies to allow for flexible funding, creating a 'brain trust' of expertise, and simplifying access for consumers. The document also provides a table of existing public green infrastructure banks in the OECD, including examples from Australia, the UK, Korea, Canada, and the USA.

The paper examines two contrasting models for financing clean infrastructure in middle-income countries: Brazil's centralized approach led by the national development bank (BNDES) and India's decentralized system involving various public and private institutions. Through case studies of wind energy projects, the authors find that despite their structural differences, both systems are dominated by public financing and struggle with a lack of true non-recourse project finance and limited financial innovation. Brazil's model effectively supports national industrial goals through local content requirements and centralized auctions but faces risks of crowding out private investment and governance issues. India's model allows for more diverse participants and smoother integration of international development finance but suffers from higher system costs, uneven investment across sectors, and significant revenue risks due to the poor financial health of state-owned power distribution companies (discoms). The report concludes that the effectiveness of these models is heavily dependent on complementary regulatory and policy frameworks rather than the financing structure alone.

The report analyzes how China's coal power growth was driven by a combination of government capacity targets, stable electricity tariffs, and preferential access to low-cost debt for state-owned enterprises (SOEs). It finds that SOEs have become increasingly financially self-sustaining, using tariff revenues intended for depreciation to fund new capital expenditures, which limits the effectiveness of recent government efforts to constrain coal growth. While macroeconomic shifts and new environmental policies are slowing demand, the report argues that the financial autonomy of SOEs allows them to continue expanding coal assets independently of external policy support.

This report by the Climate Policy Initiative analyzes the scale and distribution of Chinese finance for overseas coal power projects, highlighting China's role as a major provider of finance and the potential impact of its 2015 commitment to control public investment in high-carbon overseas projects.

The document analyzes the economic value and operational gaps in Central Kalimantan's oil palm sector, highlighting significant under-utilization of midstream mill capacity and limited downstream refining. It identifies a wide range of business models, from smallholder farmers to fully integrated multinationals, and argues that integrated models are better equipped to manage financial, production, and market risks. The authors recommend a 'landscape management approach' via the PALM Program to transition the sector toward sustainable, high-productivity practices without further deforestation.

The 2012 Forest Code regulates the use and protection of native vegetation on private lands in Brazil, utilizing Permanent Preservation Areas (APP) and Legal Reserves (Reserva Legal) to balance agricultural productivity with environmental conservation. A central component is the Rural Environmental Registry (CAR), a mandatory electronic database for monitoring and planning. The law includes a special legal regime for 'consolidated areas'—lands illegally deforested before July 22, 2008—allowing these owners to regularize their status through the Environmental Regularization Program (PRA), which offers flexible restoration parameters and the possibility of compensating Legal Reserves in other locations. However, implementation faces challenges, including reliance on varying state-level regulations, legal uncertainties from pending lawsuits, and the need for individual landowner initiative and resources.

The report identifies a significant gap in tracking private finance for climate adaptation, noting that less than 10% of publicly-mobilized private climate finance is directed toward adaptation. It proposes four methodological approaches—ranging from 'Direct' to 'Indirect Expanded'—to better capture how public interventions, including those providing enabling outputs like capacity building, trigger private investment. Through case studies in Northern Uganda and the African Risk Capacity, the authors demonstrate that relying solely on direct co-financing data leads to underestimations of mobilization. The report concludes that while indirect mobilization is harder to measure and carries higher risks of double counting, tracking it is essential to incentivize the upstream public support necessary for climate resilience.

The 2012 Forest Code governs private land use in Brazil through Permanent Preservation Areas (APP) and Legal Forest Reserves, utilizing the Rural Environmental Registry (CAR) for monitoring. It includes a special regime for landowners who illegally deforested prior to July 2008, offering leniency and offsetting options via the Environmental Regularization Program (PRA). Implementation faces hurdles including state-level legislative delays, legal challenges regarding constitutionality, and a lack of capacity among landholders.

The document outlines the accounting framework for Landscape 2015, defining climate finance as capital flows for low-carbon and climate-resilient development. It specifies the inclusion of mitigation and adaptation finance, the types of financial instruments tracked, and the distinction between public and private finance. The methodology details the data sources used, such as BNEF and OECD, and provides a comprehensive sectoral breakdown for classifying mitigation and adaptation activities. It also lists the Development Finance Institutions and Climate Funds covered, and defines the regional classifications for the destinations of these financial flows.

The report addresses the difficulty in tracking private finance for climate adaptation, noting that it currently represents less than 10% of total mobilized private climate finance. It proposes four methodological approaches—ranging from direct co-finance to expanded indirect mobilization—and tests them using two case studies: the NU-TEC project in Northern Uganda and the African Risk Capacity (ARC) insurance mechanism. The findings highlight a trade-off between the accuracy and incentive potential of a method and its practicality and standardization potential. The authors conclude that relying solely on direct co-finance underestimates the impact of 'enabling' interventions like technical assistance and capacity building.