Search Climate Insights Directory

The document details how climate change causes direct health trauma through heat, wildfires, and storms, and indirect impacts via natural and human systems. It highlights WHO projections for increased deaths from heat and diarrhoeal diseases, the expansion of vector-borne diseases like malaria and dengue, and the risk of widespread undernutrition. Additionally, it addresses the socio-economic drivers of health decline, including extreme poverty, forced migration, and increased conflict, while identifying highly vulnerable populations such as indigenous peoples and those in low-income countries.

The document outlines how climate change increases health risks in Canada, including heat-related illness, respiratory diseases, and mental health issues, while detailing specific regional threats from the North to British Columbia.

The document outlines how climate mitigation strategies in Canada—such as phasing out coal, reducing building energy use, transitioning transportation, and shifting to plant-based diets—can simultaneously reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve health outcomes by reducing air pollution and obesity.

The document details how climate-related events disrupt health care delivery in Canada by damaging infrastructure and reducing access to supplies and services. It advocates for the use of resiliency checklists, vulnerability assessments, and stress testing to prepare facilities. To mitigate their own environmental impact, the text suggests reducing high-intensity energy use, phasing out potent inhalation anesthetic gases, and adopting sustainable procurement, as 90% of the health sector's GHGs originate upstream. Specific recommendations include transitioning to plant-based diets, expanding telemedicine to reduce travel emissions, and establishing a sustainability support office based on the English National Health Services model.

The document outlines how climate change impacts Canadian health through extreme weather, food and water insecurity, and disease, while offering specific guidance for health professionals to mitigate these risks.

The document outlines how health professionals can act as trusted messengers to educate the public on climate-related health risks, engage peers through academic and professional channels, and influence policy-makers. It emphasizes focusing on climate policies that offer immediate health co-benefits and healthcare savings, while encouraging institutional changes such as fossil fuel divestment in universities and professional associations. The Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment (CAPE) supports these efforts through regional volunteer committees in British Columbia, Alberta, Quebec, and Ontario.

The document is a joint open letter signed by 189 individuals and numerous organisations calling for the COP30 summit to address the systemic threat of climate disinformation. The signatories argue that the proliferation of false information undermines the Paris Agreement and hinders the transition to a sustainable future. They demand that COP30 establish a formal framework for information integrity, increase transparency regarding the funding of climate-related communications, and hold actors accountable for the intentional spread of disinformation. The letter emphasizes that without a commitment to truth and evidence-based policy, global efforts to limit warming to 1.5°C are at risk.

The Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment and other organizations call for the expansion of the Online Harms Act to combat disinformation. They argue that tech platform architectures prioritize profit over safety, allowing climate disinformation and foreign interference to thrive. The letter proposes six recommendations: implementing a duty of care for safety, increasing algorithmic transparency, requiring financial disclosure for monetization, regulating online advertising, establishing digital sovereignty, and investing in information resilience.

PFAS are a class of over 4,700 synthetic chemicals linked to various severe health conditions, including cancer and immune suppression. In Canada, 98.5% of a national sample had at least three types of PFAS in their blood, with vulnerable populations disproportionately affected. The Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment (CAPE) urges the Canadian government to finalize the listing of PFAS as toxic substances under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA) to enable comprehensive regulation and banning.

The document serves as a resource guide for the Canadian education system to counter the influence of corporate interests in climate curricula. It categorizes a wide array of vetted materials across themes such as climate science, Indigenous perspectives, civic engagement, and climate justice. Additionally, it lists advocacy networks, including For Our Kids and the Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment, which work to remove industry-sponsored materials from schools.

The document outlines the risks of 'FrackLNG' in British Columbia, noting that 84% of public health studies find evidence of hazard or risk. It highlights potential health issues such as reproductive toxicity and asthma, as well as significant threats to water and air quality. The text argues that the Pacific Northwest LNG project alone could make it nearly impossible for BC to meet its 2050 climate targets, as the project's estimated 10 Mt CO2e/year emissions would consume most of the province's 13 Mt CO2e/yr target. Additionally, it notes social risks, including increased violence against Indigenous women and girls in Northeastern BC, and calls for a moratorium on fracking permits based on the Precautionary Principle.

The Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment (CAPE) and other applicants argue that the Canadian Gas Association (CGA) has engaged in greenwashing by marketing natural gas as a clean and affordable energy source. The document asserts that natural gas has a lifecycle climate impact comparable to coal, causes significant indoor and outdoor pollution, and is less affordable than heat pumps, especially as carbon pricing increases. The applicants request a Competition Bureau inquiry, a public retraction of the claims, and a $10 million fine.

The document examines the risks associated with atrazine, a herbicide common in Canadian corn fields but banned in the European Union since 2003. It highlights the chemical's high leaching potential and frequent contamination of surface and groundwater, particularly in corn-growing regions of Québec. The briefing details atrazine's role as an endocrine disruptor, linking it to reproductive toxicity in animals—such as the feminization of frogs—and various reproductive health issues in humans, though it notes a lack of consensus on its carcinogenicity. It further discusses the synergistic toxicity of atrazine when mixed with other pesticides and critiques the Canadian Pest Management Regulatory Agency's (PMRA) limited scope in its risk reviews. Finally, it suggests that corn yields can be maintained through integrated pest management and mechanical weeding, supporting the call for a national ban.

The document examines the use and impact of atrazine in Canada and globally, highlighting its role as a significant environmental and health risk despite declining sales in Quebec. It details the chemical's persistence in surface and groundwater, its classification as an endocrine disruptor by several governments, and its toxic effects on wildlife, particularly amphibians. The text also discusses the lack of consensus on human carcinogenicity, the risks associated with pesticide 'cocktails', and the legal challenges surrounding its regulation in North America, ultimately advocating for a ban based on the European example.

The document outlines the link between biodiversity and population health, positioning urban forests as a municipal tool to mitigate the 'triple planetary crisis' of climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. It highlights the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework and Canada's amended Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA) as policy drivers. Evidence is provided on the physical, mental, and social health benefits of urban trees, with specific advantages for children, seniors, and pregnant women. The briefing concludes with seven policy recommendations for municipal governments, including the adoption of Urban Forest Management Plans and equity-focused planting strategies.

The Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment (CAPE) and the Canadian Association of Nurses for the Environment (CANE) call for a moratorium on fracking expansion in British Columbia, citing severe health risks to local populations and the climate impact of methane leakage. They recommend a transition to zero-emissions buildings, the end of fossil fuel subsidies, and a just transition for affected workers and Indigenous communities.

The Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment (CAPE) recommends amending Bill C-12 to include a 2025 emissions target, establish a truly independent scientific advisory body reporting to Parliament, and ensure explicit alignment with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). CAPE frames climate change as a critical health threat, noting that Canada is the only G7 country whose emissions have risen since the 2016 Paris Agreement.

The document highlights that oil and gas development in Fort McKay leads to significant air quality issues, including odors, dust, and combustion-related pollution. It notes that NO2 levels exceed the AQMS 'orange management level', requiring active air management, and that poor air quality occurs half the time. The author argues that the benefits of an emissions cap depend on implementation, suggesting that relying solely on carbon capture and storage (CCS) offers minimal co-benefits, whereas improving energy efficiency or phasing down surface mining could reduce local environmental and health impacts.

The report details seven greenwashing tactics used by the fossil fuel industry: paltering, carbon offset deception, aspirational claims (petro-science fiction), vague buzzwords, double dipping, nature rinsing, and outright lies. It argues that these practices delay climate action and policy changes. The document provides examples of regulatory actions in the UK, EU, and Norway, and calls for a comprehensive ban on fossil fuel advertising in Canada, similar to the restrictions placed on the tobacco industry.

The report estimates that four Canadian environmental regulations—the Coal Phase-Out, Clean Electricity, Volatile Organic Compound (VOC), and Methane Regulations—will generate between $18 billion and $21 billion in direct health benefits by 2050. These savings, primarily from reduced respiratory and cardiovascular illnesses caused by pollutants like NOx, SOx, and particulate matter, are equivalent to the cost of 2,200 to 2,500 doctors over 36 years. The authors argue that these figures are conservative as they exclude broader climate-related health gains and that policymakers should maintain these commitments despite current economic pressures.