Search Climate Insights Directory

The report details the outcomes of a conference held in Jinja, Uganda, from 11 to 13 March 2009, focusing on the impact of HIV and AIDS on African armed forces. It argues that the pandemic threatens regional security and development, specifically noting that recruitment policies based on health factors can lead to "grossly diminished soldier’s combat readiness." The participants recommend the creation of an African Network on HIV and AIDS in the military to spearhead a unified policy (CCAAHM) covering recruitment, the care of HIV-positive soldiers, and guidelines for peacekeeping deployments. Key proposed actions include adopting a common policy for control and prevention, integrating voluntary counseling and testing (VCCT) in pre-deployment, and conducting human rights assessments of HIV-related military policies.

The provided text consists of the abbreviations, acronyms, and acknowledgments sections of a monograph focused on combating money laundering in East and Southern Africa. It identifies the project as a collaborative effort by the Institute for Security Studies, funded by the Royal Norwegian Government, and involving various regulatory and law enforcement agencies in Southern Africa.

The document is a country fact sheet for Zambia, providing basic data on its location, population, political system, and economic indicators. It lists Zambia's natural resources, including minerals and hydropower, and outlines its constitutional and legal framework based on common law.

The document argues that while Zambia has a growing tradition of civil society activism, these organisations have largely ignored the military, leaving a void in the oversight of defence policy and budgeting. It highlights the historical context of coup attempts in 1990 and 1997 as evidence of weak civil-military relations and calls for a shift away from military secrecy toward transparency. The author suggests that civil society, parliament, and the executive must collaborate to define a democratic security doctrine, specifically targeting defence budgeting and policy formulation to prevent military intervention and ensure accountability for public funds.

The document provides a structural breakdown of the I Defence and Security Committee (ISDSC), illustrating a hierarchy that descends from a Ministerial Committee to various technical sub-sub-committees. It specifies functional areas such as operations, intelligence, and logistics, and assigns leadership or oversight of specific sub-committees to different member states, including Angola, Botswana, Namibia, South Africa, Zambia, and Zimbabwe.

The document serves as a basic profile of Zimbabwe, covering its physical and demographic data, its transition to a semi-presidential consociationalist republic under a 2008 power-sharing agreement, and a history of human rights challenges including state violence and the effects of land reform.

The document examines the evolution of environmental security, critiquing 'statist' models that view environmental scarcity primarily as a threat to the state. It proposes a 'human security' framework, specifically applying a Sustainable Livelihoods approach to understand how land access and tenure systems in Africa influence poverty and conflict. The author highlights that in southern Africa, colonial legacies of land dispossession and current 'opportunistic land grabbing' by elites exacerbate insecurity. The paper concludes that sustainable security requires moving beyond technical fixes to address the underlying power imbalances, governance failures, and social injustices that drive environmental and human insecurity.

The document analyzes the evolution of Rhodesian command and control from the early Joint Operations Centres (JOCs) to the creation of Combined Operations (COMOPS). It highlights systemic failures, including inter-service friction between the Army and Police, the absence of a coherent national strategy, and the over-centralization of tactical decisions by high command, which marginalized operational commanders and neglected long-term strategic planning.

The document analyzes the Rhodesian Security Forces' strategy of conducting cross-border raids to disrupt ZANLA and ZAPU insurgent bases and logistics. It details operations in Mozambique, where the focus shifted from inflicting casualties to logistical disruption as ZANLA adopted dispersed camp structures; in Zambia, where physical barriers and political constraints limited early actions before escalating to pre-emptive strikes against ZPRA; and in Botswana and Angola, which served as transit and training hubs. The text concludes that while external operations were a military necessity, they were constrained by limited aircraft, the political cost of white casualties, and the inability of Rhodesian weaponry to defeat hardened insurgent bunkers.

The author argues that the South African Army's current force design, based on a 'core force' approach and non-offensive posture from the late 1990s, is inadequate for the realities of 'war among the people'. The analysis highlights the rise of China's influence in Africa, the failure of multilateral institutions, and the necessity of shifting toward intelligence-led, psychological operations to avoid the failures seen in peacekeeping missions like Srebrenica. Locally, the army faces challenges from an ageing force structure, loss of key skills, and the impact of the HIV/AIDS epidemic.

The provided text consists solely of biographical information for the authors of a report, including researchers from the Institute for Security Studies, Zambian government and military officials, and representatives from the Bank of Zambia and the United Nations High Commission for Refugees.

The document discusses the psychological and social challenges refugees face, the policy approach of Zambia in integrating refugees with local populations, and the implementation of a peace and conflict resolution training programme. It argues that sustainable repatriation depends on healing 'invisible wounds' and equipping refugees with human relationship skills to prevent conflict upon returning to war-ravaged homelands.

The document examines how corruption in the oil, gas, and mining sectors in Africa leads to significant wealth loss through illicit financial flows, tax avoidance, and transfer pricing. It identifies a lack of state capacity, bureaucratic discretion, and political will as primary drivers of these failures. While various international and regional initiatives exist, the author argues they are often ineffective due to low administrative capacity and a focus on 'grand' corruption over systemic issues. The paper highlights Botswana as a successful model of natural resource governance and provides twelve recommendations for technical and institutional capacity building to combat corruption.

The report assesses Zambia's stability, noting that while the country has avoided civil war, it faces structural threats from pervasive poverty, neopatrimonial governance, and an imbalance of power between the executive and other state branches. It highlights the risk of political entrepreneurs exploiting ethnic tensions and the potential for social unrest due to economic inequality and a stalled constitutional review process.

The document explores the tension between formal 'due process' and substantive justice, arguing that criminal law is often a tool for political and economic power rather than a neutral instrument. It contrasts consensus-functionalist and radical-conflict paradigms of law and evaluates the impact of colonial legacies on the current state of criminal justice in Africa, where corruption and repression remain prevalent.

The author critiques the mainstream definition of organised crime, which often views it as a structured, culturally homogenous conspiracy. The paper introduces four models of criminal coordination—hierarchy, networks, markets, and clans—and argues that real-world criminal entities are often hybrids of these. It specifically examines the application of these views in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) region and suggests that the term 'illicit enterprise' better captures the continuum between legal and illegal business activities.

The provided text consists of the professional CVs and qualifications of a consultancy team proposed for the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) of gas exploratory drilling in Blocks L4 and L13 in Lamu County, Kenya. It details the expertise of five specialists: an ESIA specialist, a socio-economist, a hydrologist, an environmental chemist, and a GIS specialist, listing their academic backgrounds, professional affiliations, and extensive project histories in the energy, mining, and infrastructure sectors across East Africa and beyond.

The handbook provides a comprehensive guide for African environmental and land rights defenders (ELRDs), detailing the threats they face—including SLAPP suits and gender-based violence—and the legal avenues available for redress. It outlines the roles of the African Commission and African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights, as well as sub-regional courts like the ECOWAS Community Court of Justice. The document emphasizes the vulnerability of women, youth, and Indigenous communities, and provides a directory of emergency funds and support organizations.

The authors contend that African urbanization is a demographic megatrend that reshapes politics in diverse, context-specific ways. They reject a uniform 'urban effect,' proposing instead that political changes—such as shifts in citizen preferences, elite incentives, and forms of mobilization—are the direct result of territorially-situated power struggles and the specific social relations produced within built environments. The paper examines six domains: citizen preferences, elite interests, political mobilization, gender roles, civil society, and contentious collective action, highlighting how these are mediated by the unique histories and physical characteristics of different urban places.

The authors present the Non-State Actors (NSA) in Civil Wars dataset, covering internal armed conflicts from 1945 to 2011. The dataset shifts the unit of analysis from country-years to state-rebel group dyad spells, allowing researchers to examine the specific characteristics of opposition forces rather than just macro-level state variables. Key indicators include rebel strength relative to the government, territorial control, organizational structure (such as the presence of political wings), and external support from states or non-state actors. Descriptive statistics from the dataset show that while over 85% of rebel groups are weaker than their governments, nearly half are at least equal in their specific capacities to mobilize support, procure arms, and fight. The dataset is designed to be compatible with the Uppsala Conflict Data Project (UCDP) Dyadic Dataset to facilitate data aggregation across different research projects.