Search Climate Insights Directory

The briefing argues that biological weapons remain a viable and rational strategic option for some states due to their low cost, potential for deniability, and asymmetric impact. It challenges the notion that these weapons are tactically useless or too risky to develop, noting that historical precedents and the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrate that leaders may prioritize state status or regime survival over the risks of blowback. The authors further contend that bioweapons programs are not always top-down initiatives and that current international norms, specifically the Biological Weapons Convention, lack the enforcement and verification mechanisms necessary to effectively stop such programs.

The author reflects on Zambia's historical support for Southern African liberation movements and its use of a compulsory 'Civics' curriculum to pre-empt xenophobia from childhood. The text suggests that South Africa lacks a similar educational mechanism to teach citizens about the role other African countries played in its struggle, which contributes to recurring xenophobic violence. It recommends the creation of a Presidential Working Group on Xenophobia and calls for prominent African executives in South Africa to be more open about their origins to combat negative perceptions.

The author reflects on three major shifts in global history—the end of Eurocentrism and Empire, the end of the Cold War, and a current shift away from Anglo-Saxon economic and political dominance. While acknowledging the roles of leaders like Jan Smuts and Nelson Mandela, the author contends that South African citizens must take personal responsibility for their destiny in areas such as education, health, and finance to support the nation's construction and avoid fragmentation.

The document traces the South African defence industry's shift from a state-driven system designed for apartheid-era isolation to a competitive global actor. Following the end of the Cold War and the transition to democracy in 1994, the industry underwent significant downsizing and restructuring, moving away from total self-sufficiency toward strategic partnerships and export-led growth. Key entities like Armscor and Denel were reorganized to separate procurement from manufacturing, while the private sector consolidated. The paper highlights the role of the Strategic Defence Packages (SDPs) and Industrial Participation (IP) in revitalizing the sector, alongside the challenges of implementing black economic empowerment and aligning industrial policy with regional foreign policy goals.

The report examines the Rhodesian government's attempt to apply 'stability operations'—combining internal defence and development—to counter insurgency. It details the evolution of psychological warfare units, from the informal Sheppard group to the formal 1 Psychological Operations Unit and the Directorate of Psychological Warfare. The analysis highlights a consistent failure to achieve 'hearts and minds' due to a reliance on force, racial paternalism, and a lack of genuine civic action. Specific failures are noted in food control (Operation Turkey), disinformation campaigns (Operation Splitshot), and the manipulation of spirit mediums, concluding that the state's emphasis on the 'iron fist' over the 'velvet glove' rendered its psychological efforts ineffective.

The document analyzes the Rhodesian Security Forces' strategy of conducting cross-border raids to disrupt ZANLA and ZAPU insurgent bases and logistics. It details operations in Mozambique, where the focus shifted from inflicting casualties to logistical disruption as ZANLA adopted dispersed camp structures; in Zambia, where physical barriers and political constraints limited early actions before escalating to pre-emptive strikes against ZPRA; and in Botswana and Angola, which served as transit and training hubs. The text concludes that while external operations were a military necessity, they were constrained by limited aircraft, the political cost of white casualties, and the inability of Rhodesian weaponry to defeat hardened insurgent bunkers.

The document provides a historical analysis of youth involvement in Mozambique's political change, arguing that young people have often been the 'engine for change' but have also been subject to systemic exploitation and manipulation. It traces the shift from youth seeking economic autonomy through migrant labour during Portuguese colonialism to their role as ideological tools for Frelimo's socialist project after independence. The text highlights the blurred lines between civilian and military roles during the civil war, specifically challenging the narrative that only Renamo used child soldiers by documenting Frelimo's forced recruitment and deceptive schooling programmes. It concludes that while youth were central to the nation's formation, contemporary Mozambican youth feel unheard and marginalized by the current regime.