Search Climate Insights Directory

The evaluation of the GCF's 'Health and Well-being, and Food and Water Security' (HWFW) result area finds that while investments are highly relevant to country needs—particularly in food and water security—the RA approach itself has been inconsequential to achieving results. The report highlights significant gaps in health-related programming and tracking, as well as systemic challenges in results reporting and data quality. It recommends a comprehensive rearticulation of the purpose and formulation of all GCF result areas to better align with project origination and strategic impact.

The report provides a gender assessment for the Mirova Sustainable Land Fund 2 (MSLF2), identifying how land degradation and deforestation disproportionately affect women due to systemic gaps in land rights and resource access. It outlines a programmatic approach to integrate gender lens investing, aligning with the 2X Challenge criteria and GCF Gender Policy. The fund sets specific targets, including that 35% of jobs created will go to women and 44% of total beneficiaries will be women. The document also provides detailed gender profiles for Ghana, Costa Rica, Peru, the Philippines, and Malaysia, highlighting country-specific labour force participation and legal frameworks.

The document highlights the critical role of Indigenous Peoples in Southeast Asia as environmental stewards, noting that their lands overlap with 40% of global protected areas and that deforestation rates on their lands in Southeast Asia are half those on other lands. It criticizes the ASEAN declaration on environmental rights for omitting Indigenous Peoples, arguing that this lack of recognition leads to 'development aggression,' criminalization of land defenders, and the erosion of traditional knowledge. The brief specifically notes the vulnerability of Indigenous women and the overlooked contributions of marine-based 'Sea Nomads.' It concludes by recommending that ASEAN and its Member States formally adopt the terminology and protections of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) to improve biodiversity and climate outcomes.

The document details how an Innovation Partnership between Climate Outreach and Pledgeball since 2021 has integrated academic research and expert evaluation into Pledgeball's climate action initiatives. By utilizing a collaboratively developed communications toolkit and M&E support, Pledgeball has refined its approach to engage sports fans through a pledging mechanism, avoiding buzzwords and focusing on community validation. The partnership has helped Pledgeball scale its operations to include 10-20 professional football clubs per season and other sports organizations, while providing Climate Outreach with case studies on the 'ripple effect' of community-led climate engagement.

The research identifies six globally-influential climate adaptation imaginaries—Eco Modern State, Just Adaptation, Promethean (Green) Growth, High Tech Society, Human Stewardship, and Knowledge Society—and argues that dominant visions often reproduce existing power relations and business-as-usual approaches.

The briefing highlights that iron production accounts for over 80% of steel supply chain emissions and argues that a common 'near-zero emissions' iron definition is necessary to guide investment and trade. It proposes a threshold of 350 kgCO2e/t iron to exclude coal-based production and suggests that hydrogen-based direct reduction (DRI) is the primary commercial pathway to achieve this. To overcome supply chain complexities, the document advocates for direct procurement and 'book and claim' systems, announcing that RMI will design and test a climate-credible book and claim system for iron and steel in 2025.

The document proposes a shift from traditional technology-replacement efficiency to a 'whole-systems' approach. It argues that combining electrification with energy end-use efficiency (reducing the demand for energy services) can reduce overall energy demand by 50-75%. The author provides sector-specific examples: in buildings, through passive design and compact urban development; in mobility, via land-use reforms and smaller, lighter electric vehicles; in freight, through modal shifts to rail and material demand reduction; and in steel, via circularity and material substitution. The brief concludes that achieving the COP28 goal of doubling energy efficiency improvement rates requires engaging a diverse range of stakeholders to trigger social tipping points.

The document outlines the critical role of oceans in absorbing heat and carbon, the resulting environmental and socioeconomic crises, and offers strategic advice for journalists to improve the depth and justice-orientation of ocean reporting.

The document outlines the environmental and socioeconomic impacts of ocean warming and acidification, while offering strategic advice for journalists to move beyond reactive coverage toward sustained, justice-oriented reporting on marine ecosystems.

The statement asserts that oil and gas developers are locking in emissions that threaten the ability to maintain manageable global warming levels. It argues that because major oil and gas companies cannot be expected to lead a transition, financial institutions must stop supporting the development of new oil and gas fields and new liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminals.

The statement contends that integrated oil and gas majors are not transitioning to sustainable energy and should be excluded from financial support. Citing the Global Oil and Gas Exit List (GOGEL), it highlights that 95% of oil and gas companies worldwide have plans for new projects, with major European firms like BP, Shell, and TotalEnergies increasing production or expanding short-term plans. The author argues that these companies are diverting capital away from clean energy, with the three European majors projected to allocate less than a third of future investments to low-carbon activities, contradicting IEA 1.5°C scenarios.

The We Mean Business Coalition states that the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement is a disservice to American businesses and people, as it creates policy instability and allows other economies to attract investment and talent. The Coalition emphasizes that the Paris Agreement remains a cornerstone of global action and that businesses and other nations will continue to pursue clean energy transitions due to economic necessity and climate risks.

The IPBES Nexus and Transformative Change assessments highlight a critical imbalance in global finance, where trillions of dollars support activities damaging nature while conservation funding remains severely inadequate. With over half of global GDP dependent on nature, the reports argue for systemic economic reforms, including the elimination of harmful subsidies, the internalisation of environmental externalities, and increased financial flows to Indigenous Peoples and developing nations to mitigate systemic risks.

The document analyzes the role of electricity supply as a climate adaptation tool for groundwater pumping, specifically highlighting how low night-time tariffs in Mexico have led to increased pumping and higher emissions, threatening aquifer sustainability and riparian ecosystems.

The 2022 Scorecard evaluates eight major private equity firms managing $3.6 trillion in assets, finding that ten of the largest buyout firms held at least 80 percent of their energy portfolios in fossil fuels as of October 2021. The Carlyle Group received the lowest grade (F), with its downstream power plants emitting over 10.8 million metric tons of carbon dioxide in 2020. Other firms including Warburg Pincus, KKR, Brookfield, Ares, Apollo, and Blackstone Group received Ds, while TPG earned a B. The report highlights a lack of transparency, noting that The Carlyle Group's TCFD report excludes its fossil-fuel-focused subsidiary, NGP Energy Capital, despite NGP contributing nearly 61 percent of the firm's profit in the first half of 2022. The authors demand that firms align with 1.5°C targets, cease fossil fuel expansion, disclose all emissions, and integrate climate and environmental justice.

The fifth meeting of the BWC Working Group, held in December 2024, failed to reach consensus on establishing an international cooperation and assistance (ICA) mechanism and a science and technology (S&T) mechanism due to a unilateral objection by the Russian Federation. While there is general agreement on the need for a verification regime, significant divergence remains regarding its definition, scope, and the relevance of the 2001 draft protocol. The author recommends that 2025 sessions focus on establishing a workplan, a 'North Star' ambition, and guiding principles before formal technical negotiations begin, and calls for a special conference in 2025 to ratify the provisional mechanisms.

The document evaluates global efforts to achieve universal water and sanitation coverage, contrasting the historical use of private sector investment with a renewed shift toward public governance models based on improved institutional regulation and competition management.

The document analyzes the nexus of energy, water, and climate in Mexico, arguing that subsidized nighttime electricity tariffs have incentivized indiscriminate groundwater pumping, undermining water conservation efforts and threatening aquifer sustainability. It estimates that emissions from agricultural groundwater extraction in Mexico account for 3.6% of total national emissions.

The document examines the AfCFTA Implementation Review Mechanism (AFIRM), established in July 2024 to address slow implementation of the AfCFTA Agreement. It contrasts AFIRM's direct assessment of obligations with the WTO's Trade Policy Review Mechanism (TPRM), which focuses on general trade policy and transparency. The author warns that AFIRM's current approach may cause state resistance or lead to the blocking of reports by the Council of Ministers, recommending that review reports avoid definitive assessments of non-compliance to secure member buy-in.

The paper examines the Global Framework for Climate Services (GFCS), established by the World Meteorological Organization in 2009 to improve interaction between climate knowledge producers and users. Using Social Network Analysis (SNA), the study analyzes the institutional trajectories, contact points, and levels of cooperation among participating organizations to assess the potential for intensifying collaboration in the provision of climate services.