Search Climate Insights Directory

The report details the first ten years of the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI), outlining its mission to understand global environmental changes in the Americas. It describes the evolution of its scientific agenda from seven initial themes to four broad categories, the implementation of various grant programs (Initial Grants, Initial Scientific Program, and Cooperative Research Networks), and the establishment of its headquarters in Brazil. Key achievements include the funding of 14 Cooperative Research Networks (CRNs) with a US$10 million investment, the training of hundreds of scientists and students, and the creation of the IAI-DIS data system. The document also lists specific research projects focusing on climate variability, biodiversity, and human dimensions across North, Central, and South America.

The IAI Ad Hoc Committee on Relations with Member States focused on improving engagement with member countries through the development of 'Partnership' documents, the identification of science-related focal points, and targeted outreach to countries with budget arrears or previous activity. The committee recommended prioritizing the maintenance of the Collaborative Research Networks (CRN) program as a primary incentive for participation and proposed a system for in-kind contributions to be reviewed by the Executive Council and Conference of the Parties.

The IAI ad hoc Committee for Relations with Member States met in February 2004 to develop strategies for improving engagement with member countries. Key actions included creating 'Partnership' documents for member states, identifying 3-5 key contacts per country across science implementation, policy, and funding, and sending formal letters to recover overdue budget contributions. The committee prioritised countries that were previously active but are now delinquent or inactive, specifically noting Bolivia for special contact. It also recommended that the next phase of the Cooperative Research Networks (CRN) program be a primary incentive for participation, emphasizing open calls for proposals and a focus on policy relevance.

The document analyzes the sustainability challenges of the coffee sector, such as declining prices and environmental degradation, and evaluates how different contracting systems can address these issues. It compares conventional contracts with alternative models like Fairtrade (FLO), Starbucks' Preferred Supplier Program, and Utz Kapeh, concluding that while contracts cannot solve macro-economic crises, they can improve producer stability through long-term agreements, price differentials, and preferred supplier status.

The report identifies a significant gap between high-level policy and project-level implementation in peacebuilding efforts by the U4 governments. It recommends shifting impact assessment from individual projects to a strategic level and adopting formal frameworks for both general and case-specific intervention strategies.

The report evaluates the current state of voluntary corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives addressing business operations in violent conflict zones. It identifies significant gaps in knowledge, stakeholder consensus, and participation from developing countries. The authors argue that while some guidance exists—particularly for the extractive sector—it is largely policy-based rather than operational. The document provides a framework for governments to move beyond simple compliance toward a 'peacebuilding' approach, suggesting roles for the public sector such as mandating legal baselines, facilitating research, and endorsing best practices to strengthen the enabling environment for conflict-sensitive investment.

The document examines Brazil's role in the FTAA negotiations, highlighting the tension between Brazil's desire for agricultural market access and the US's push for the inclusion of 'Singapore issues' such as investment and intellectual property. It details Brazil's efforts to protect sensitive industrial sectors and its strategic use of Mercosur to avoid isolation as the US pursues bilateral agreements with other Latin American nations. The analysis concludes that the FTAA is shifting toward a flexible 'ALCA-lite' framework with a limited built-in agenda.

The document analyzes the intersection of intellectual property and development, highlighting the risks of fragmented negotiations across different international bodies. It focuses on three critical issues for the September 2004 WIPO General Assembly: the interrelation between the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and IP disclosure requirements, the proposed treaty on the protection of broadcasting organizations, and the future of the Substantive Patent Law Treaty (SPLT). Additionally, it tracks IP-related activities in the WTO, WHO, UNCTAD, and various bilateral 'TRIPS-plus' trade agreements, arguing that developed countries often use bilateral fora to circumvent multilateral flexibilities.

The report examines the shift in intellectual property standard-setting from multilateral forums like the WTO and WIPO to bilateral and regional trade agreements. It highlights the risk of "TRIPS-plus" provisions—standards exceeding the WTO's TRIPS Agreement—which erode flexibilities for developing countries. A central focus is the application of non-violation complaints in bilateral deals (e.g., US-Chile, CAFTA), which the authors argue could make WTO discussions irrelevant and restrict the right of states to regulate IP in the public interest. The document also updates activities in the TRIPS Council, WIPO's committees on patents and genetic resources, and various UN agencies regarding traditional knowledge and public health.

The document argues that while trade and aid are intended to foster development and security, they often exacerbate conflict through the exploitation of natural resources, volatile aid flows, and unbalanced trade liberalization. It calls for an integrated approach that incorporates security as a primary goal, improves governance, and utilizes mechanisms like commodity price stabilization and product certification to mitigate the 'dark sides' of commerce and assistance.

A formal Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request submitted by Friends of the Earth – U.S. and other environmental organizations to the United States Trade Representative for documents concerning investment provisions in various U.S. free trade agreements.

The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL), along with Friends of the Earth – US, Natural Resources Defense Council, and Defenders of Wildlife, submitted a FOIA request to the USTR for all environmental provisions and supporting documents of free trade agreements negotiated since early 2003, specifically mentioning agreements with Morocco, Colombia, Australia, and Central America.

The document details the outcomes of a workshop stream titled 'Supporting Protected Areas in Times of Violent Conflict' at the 2003 World Parks Congress. It argues that peace is a fundamental precondition for conservation and that protected areas can either exacerbate or help mitigate conflict depending on their management. Key recommendations include establishing an international crisis response team, recognizing the neutrality of field staff, and integrating conservation ethics into military and humanitarian operations. The report emphasizes the need for proactive community engagement, continued donor support during crises, and the use of specialized monitoring tools like Peace and Conflict Impact Assessments (PCIA) to manage the dynamic relationship between biodiversity conservation and violent conflict.

The document examines the role of International Financial Institutions (IFIs), including multilateral development banks and export credit agencies, in financing large-scale extractive projects. It argues that these investments frequently lead to environmental disasters, human rights abuses, and the marginalization of indigenous peoples while failing to alleviate poverty. Through case studies in Peru, Colombia, the Philippines, Laos, Romania, Chad, Cameroon, Papua New Guinea, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Turkey, and Lithuania, the report illustrates the 'resource curse' and the failure of the export-led development model. It concludes by recommending a gradual phase-out of IFI lending for extractive industries and a shift toward renewable energy and community-led sustainable initiatives.

The report by Friends of the Earth International contends that IFIs, including multilateral development banks and export credit agencies, facilitate a destructive export-led development model. Through various case studies in countries like Peru, Colombia, and the Philippines, the document illustrates how these investments lead to environmental catastrophes, human rights violations, and the marginalization of indigenous peoples and women. It specifically highlights the contradiction between IFI funding of fossil fuels and global climate goals, ultimately recommending a phased withdrawal from extractive sectors in favor of decentralized renewable energy initiatives.

The report presents twelve reasons why large hydroelectric projects are incompatible with the goals of renewable energy initiatives. It contends that these projects fail to alleviate poverty, divert funding from cleaner decentralized technologies, and often suffer from underestimated costs and overestimated benefits. The text highlights severe social and environmental impacts, including the forced displacement of 40 to 80 million people and the emission of greenhouse gases from reservoirs. It further argues that large dams increase vulnerability to climate change, are inflexible and costly to build, and are not truly renewable due to sedimentation.

The report details the academic and research productivity of several CRN members, including student supervision, workshop organization, and a comprehensive list of publications and presentations. It highlights a significant growth in the program's scale, with the number of participating institutions increasing from 130 in July 1999 to 236 by June 2003, and the number of researchers growing from 171 to 347 in the same period. Key research areas include climate variability, the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and its impacts on health (specifically malaria) and hydrology, ultraviolet (UV) radiation effects on aquatic ecosystems, and dendrochronology in the Americas.

The document argues that the human right to water requires states to maintain regulatory autonomy and flexibility, which may conflict with the trade liberalization goals of the WTO's GATS. It specifically examines how market access commitments, national treatment obligations, and proposed disciplines on domestic regulation could restrict a government's ability to use public monopolies, implement universal service obligations, or maintain environmental zoning and quality standards. The authors propose a 'progressive approach' where trade law is interpreted in deference to national regulatory autonomy to ensure that basic services are not left to the 'whim of markets'.

The Cartagena Declaration, issued in September 2003, argues that a 'predatory economic model' and the 'greed' of the Global North drive systemic environmental and human rights violations. It highlights specific injustices, such as the fumigation of the Amazon and the desecration of sacred sites by the oil industry, while criticizing the role of transnational corporations and multilateral development banks. The declaration calls for a shift toward 'ecological security, food security and energy security' and an end to the criminalization of environmental defenders.

The document argues that the WTO's 'free trade' framework is systematically biased toward transnational corporations, which use privileged access to governments in the US, EU, and Japan to shape global rules. Through case studies, it illustrates how this influence leads to the forced adoption of GMOs, restricted access to essential medicines, the privatization of water and energy, and the undermining of international environmental agreements like the Kyoto Protocol and the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. The authors call for a halt to current negotiations and an independent assessment of the social and environmental impacts of trade liberalization.