Search Climate Insights Directory

Australia employs a balanced approach to local procurement, combining national regulatory frameworks like the Australian Industry Participation (AIP) National Framework with state-level policies and Indigenous Land Use Agreements (ILUAs). Key demand-side measures include requiring AIP plans for projects exceeding AUD 500 million, while supply-side support is provided through the Supplier Access to Major Projects (SAMP) program and the ICN Gateway database. The country also aligns its education system with the needs of the Mining Equipment, Technology and Services (METS) sector and has previously used tax incentives like the Enhanced Project By-Law Scheme to reward firms implementing AIP plans.

The document describes the Mining Skills Council (CCM) in Chile, an industry-led hub established in 2012 to bridge the gap between mining company needs and educational training. By collecting data from companies and training providers, the CCM identifies skills shortages and forecasts human capital demands over a 10-year horizon. This intelligence is used to help education institutions improve training programs and create a system of certification for labour competencies. The case study highlights that while Chile lacks formal local content legislation, the CCM promotes direct employment by ensuring the local workforce possesses work-ready competencies, a model the document suggests is replicable in other countries regardless of whether they have state-owned mining companies.

The document examines how multinational enterprises (MNEs) in the mining sector use debt financing to shift profits from host countries to offshore jurisdictions. It details common base erosion techniques—such as debt 'push downs', interest rate markups, and hybrid instruments—and evaluates various policy responses. The primary recommendation is the implementation of BEPS Action 4, which links net interest deductions to a fixed ratio of taxable EBITDA (between 10% and 30%). The guide also discusses complementary measures including thin capitalisation rules, interest withholding tax (IWT), and transfer pricing regulations, while emphasizing the need to balance tax base protection with the maintenance of an attractive investment climate.

The document outlines a risk-based framework for governments to oversee the valuation of mineral exports, focusing on the technical processes of sampling, preparation, and analytical testing. It proposes three primary policy responses—direct measurement, monitoring company processes, or a hybrid approach—depending on the risk of undervaluation. The guide details the costs and requirements for establishing ISO-accredited laboratories, suggests various financing models, and recommends adopting international reporting standards like JORC or SAMREC to ensure transparency and legal defensibility in tax and royalty collection.

The document outlines three strategic options for states to control the value of mineral exports: direct measurement via a state laboratory, auditing company procedures, or a risk-based mixed approach. It details the technical process of export valuation—comprising sampling, preparation, and laboratory analysis—and discusses implementation models such as public-private partnerships and regional laboratories. The guide emphasizes that the choice of strategy should be based on the risk of under-valuation, which is higher for non-commoditized minerals, sales to related parties, and private companies. It also highlights the importance of ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation for legal defensibility and provides case studies from Sierra Leone and Guinea to illustrate the application of these strategies.

The document outlines the proceedings of a three-day conference focused on the causes, mechanisms, and aftermath of state capture in South Africa. It examines the role of apartheid legacies, the influence of the private sector, the vulnerability of state-owned enterprises, and the failure of oversight institutions. The report emphasizes that state capture is a politico-economic project involving both formal and informal power, often facilitated by the politicization of the bureaucracy and the erosion of the criminal justice system. It argues for comprehensive state reform, including electoral changes, transparency in party funding, and the protection of whistleblowers, while drawing comparisons with state capture in Nigeria, Kenya, and Angola.

The document outlines the importance of combatting illegal logging for biodiversity and climate goals, detailing the demand-side trade regulations in the US, EU, and Australia. It distinguishes legality from sustainability and describes tools for businesses to mitigate risk, including procurement policies, forest management certification, and legality verification services.

The report identifies a growing "restoration economy" where businesses generate financial returns by improving the ecological function of degraded landscapes. It categorizes these opportunities into four main investment themes: technology, consumer products, project management, and commercial forestry. Through case studies of 14 companies across eight countries, the authors illustrate how various models—from drone-based reforestation and climate-smart credit for smallholders to sustainable timber and bamboo plantations—can scale. The document highlights that while significant market opportunities exist due to government pledges and rising resource demand, investors face hurdles such as high transaction costs, low liquidity, and insecure land tenure in developing regions.

The document argues that eco-blend cements, which use industrial by-products like fly ash and slag to replace clinker, offer the most feasible near-term path to reducing the carbon footprint of South Africa's cement industry. It highlights that while these materials are abundant locally, regulatory caps on clinker substitution (currently 35%) and outdated structural standards act as primary barriers to wider adoption.

The report details Fortress Investment Group's ownership and funding of several high-interest lending entities. It describes OneMain Financial as the largest subprime consumer lender in the US, noting its use of ancillary insurance products and lobbying efforts to relax state lending restrictions. The text also covers Fortress's $150 million debt financing for ZestFinance, which operates Spotloan using a tribal partnership to bypass state usury laws, and its AUS$100 million facility for Australia's Cash Converters, a firm facing multiple class action lawsuits over fees. Additionally, it notes a $3.28 million CFPB penalty against Fortress-owned Security National Automotive Acceptance Corp for illegal debt collection practices targeting US servicemembers.

The report argues that fossil fuel subsidy reform (FFSR) is a critical tool for financing a just transition, as global subsidies total at least USD 425 billion per year. It posits that FFSR can reduce global carbon emissions by roughly 10 per cent by 2050 if both production and consumption subsidies are eliminated. The document outlines a framework for successful reform based on three elements: getting prices right, managing impacts, and building support. Through case studies of Morocco, Mexico, Argentina, Indonesia, and the Netherlands, the report demonstrates that while FFSR can create budgetary space for social safety nets and renewable energy, a lack of stakeholder engagement and abrupt price hikes—as seen in Mexico—can lead to civil unrest. Conversely, the Netherlands' long-term transition of its coal sector illustrates how targeted supports and social dialogue can protect workers during industrial shifts.

The document argues that emerging energy technologies—including solar PV, wind, battery storage, and microgrids—are now cost-competitive and more resilient than traditional fossil-fuel-based systems. It highlights that while the 2017 hurricanes caused the longest sustained outage in U.S. history, the resulting damage provides an opportunity to rebuild the grid using distributed resources that can be deployed quickly and reduce reliance on expensive imported fuels.

The document analyzes the conceptual frameworks, global and regional experiences, and existing sectoral information systems in Peru to guide the creation of a national M&E system for climate change adaptation. It highlights that while Peru has strong political commitments and sectoral data, it lacks a formally approved National Adaptation Plan and a corresponding national M&E system.

The report finds that 16 of the 25 major emitting countries and regions analysed are not on track to meet their self-determined NDC targets. While some countries like Brazil, China, and India are likely to achieve their targets with current policies, others, including the US, EU, and Canada, require additional measures. Furthermore, current policies are projected to fail to prevent emissions from increasing up to 2030 relative to 2010 levels in both developing and OECD nations, with only Japan and the EU projected to see further decreases.

The report highlights a significant surge in Canadian green bond issuance in 2017, which reached C$3.8 billion, exceeding all previous years combined. While Canada ranks 10th globally for labelled green bonds, the report identifies a substantial 'climate-aligned' bond universe of C$39 billion, suggesting significant untapped potential. Growth has been driven primarily by provincial entities like Ontario and Quebec, and government-backed entities such as Export Development Canada, with the City of Ottawa recently becoming the first municipality to issue a green bond. The document argues that while policy drivers like the Pan-Canadian Framework on Clean Growth and Climate Change are favorable, Canada lacks a comprehensive financial plan to mobilize private capital. It recommends that the federal government issue a sovereign green bond and establish national sustainable finance standards to further catalyze the market.

The report examines the discrepancy between the frequent WTO litigation of renewable energy subsidies and the absence of cases against fossil fuel subsidies. It argues that while political factors and the 'undercapture' of consumer subsidies by WTO law play a role, producer subsidies may still be actionable if sufficient evidence of adverse trade effects is provided. Through five G20 case studies, the authors highlight the difficulty of proving 'adverse effects' and the lack of transparency in subsidy notifications. The report recommends five avenues for reform: technical assistance, enhanced transparency, subsidy reform pledges, political declarations, and expanding the category of prohibited subsidies.

The document analyzes the 2017 closure of the Hazelwood Power Station in Victoria's Latrobe Valley, arguing that Australia's liberal market economy and majoritarian political institutions discourage long-term transition planning. It highlights how the closure was a commercial decision by Engie, which triggered reactive, large-scale assistance packages from both the Victorian and federal governments. The authors suggest that future 'just transitions' may require direct regulation of company obligations or the mobilization of institutional investors to pressure energy firms into adopting worker- and community-friendly closure policies.

The briefing identifies critical policy gaps in national coal transitions, emphasizing that a 'just transition' requires more than carbon pricing. It highlights the need to protect workers, build local economic resilience, avoid stranded assets, coordinate international trade flows, and secure financing. The document frames these managed transitions as a credible way for countries to increase their climate ambition within the UNFCCC framework.

The document evaluates the progress of WTO commitments made at the 10th Ministerial Conference (MC10) in Nairobi, specifically regarding agriculture and least-developed countries (LDCs). It highlights significant implementation gaps, such as the lack of a permanent solution for public stockholding for food security and the slow pace of eliminating agricultural export subsidies. The paper notes a fundamental disagreement between developed and developing nations over whether to prioritize the Doha Development Agenda (DDA) or introduce new 21st-century trade issues. For South Africa, the authors recommend aligning with the Africa Group on regional integration and industrialization, supporting the G33 proposal on public stockholding, and backing the ACP proposal on fisheries subsidies to support its own ocean economy.

Friends of the Earth International asserts that the current global energy model, dominated by fossil fuels and corporate-led 'false solutions', is driving a planetary emergency. The statement criticizes the Paris Agreement as insufficient and legally unenforceable, calling for urgent emission reductions by wealthy nations and a shift toward decentralized, community-led energy systems.