Search Climate Insights Directory

The paper examines the rapid growth of China-Africa relations, noting that while Chinese investment and debt forgiveness are welcomed, the relationship is often asymmetrical. It suggests that African leaders should adopt a pragmatic approach—inspired by Deng Xiaoping's reforms—to negotiate better terms, including technology transfer, local labour requirements, and preferential trade agreements. The author advocates for using the China-Africa Co-operation Forum to establish a formal code of conduct and a civil society forum to hold Beijing accountable for its commitments regarding human rights, arms trafficking, and fair trade.

The author contends that Africa must embrace biotechnology and genetic modification to combat climate-change induced droughts and famines. The text criticizes African nations for adopting overly stringent regulations under the Cartagena Protocol, often influenced by European Union consumer concerns, which may conflict with World Trade Organization rules and hinder the delivery of food relief. It recommends that SADC countries emulate the pro-biotechnology regulatory models of nations like Brazil, India, and South Africa to maximize agricultural yields and reduce dependence on humanitarian aid.

Friends of the Earth International rejects the Roundtable on Responsible Soy (RTRS), claiming it provides a "façade of sustainability" for agribusinesses and energy companies while failing to address the systemic impacts of industrial soy. The document highlights how soy expansion leads to deforestation, biodiversity loss, human rights violations, and increased food insecurity. It specifically criticizes the promotion of genetically modified (GM) soy, noting substantial increases in herbicide use in Brazil and the United States. The statement argues that the RTRS ignores indirect regional and global impacts, such as the displacement of agriculture into primary forests and the pollution caused by intensive livestock production in Europe. To address these issues, the organization calls for structural land reforms, reduced global demand for meat and dairy, and an end to large-scale agrofuel production.

The International Federation of Friends of the Earth rejects the Round Table on Responsible Soy (RTRS), claiming it provides a facade of sustainability for multinational corporations while ignoring the systemic impacts of industrial soy monocultures. The document details how soy expansion leads to biodiversity loss, climate change, human rights violations, and food insecurity. It specifically criticizes the promotion of genetically modified (GM) soy, noting significant increases in pesticide use in Brazil and the US. The text argues that demand is driven by intensive livestock farming and biofuels, and calls for structural land reforms, reduced meat consumption, and a shift toward organic and local agriculture.

This fact sheet by Friends of the Earth International contends that GM crops, primarily soya, maize, and cotton, fail to increase yields or reduce poverty in developing regions. It asserts that the GM model benefits large-scale industrial farmers through 'convenience' while harming small-scale farmers via high seed costs, land displacement, and increased pesticide use. The document specifically highlights negative outcomes in South America, Africa, India, and China, and disputes claims that GM technology makes food cheaper or is necessary for the livestock industry.

The document analyzes how international investment agreements (IIAs) and investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanisms interact with human rights obligations. It finds that most IIAs are silent on human rights, and the current ad hoc nature of investor-state arbitration creates legal uncertainty for states attempting to enact new human rights or environmental regulations. The author argues that the lack of transparency in these proceedings undermines democratic accountability and recommends the development of model clauses to protect the 'right to regulate' and ensure human rights values are embedded in investment law.

The report argues that genetically modified (GM) crops provide no substantive environmental, social, or economic benefits. It highlights a significant increase in pesticide use, particularly glyphosate, due to the emergence of herbicide-resistant weeds in the US, Brazil, and Argentina. The document further contends that GM crops do not increase yields—citing evidence that Roundup Ready soy may actually suffer yield losses—and that they do not address global hunger, as most are used for animal feed or biofuels in wealthy nations. Additionally, it criticizes the concentration of seed control by a few multinational corporations, which increases costs and restricts farmers' ability to save seeds.

The report argues that GM crops provide no ecological, social, or economic benefits. It highlights that herbicide-tolerant (HT) varieties promote the development of resistant weeds, leading to increased pesticide application in the US, Brazil, and Argentina. The document further asserts that GM crops do not increase yields or food security, as most are used for animal feed or biofuels rather than human consumption, and that seed monopolies increase costs for farmers.

The report argues that GM crops, primarily herbicide-tolerant and insect-resistant varieties of soya, maize, cotton, and canola, have not increased yields and have instead driven a rise in pesticide use due to the emergence of resistant weeds. It highlights the monopolization of the seed supply by a few corporations, specifically Monsanto, and documents the negative socio-economic impacts on small farmers in the US, India, and South America, including increased debt and rural poverty.

The report argues that GM crops, particularly herbicide-tolerant (HT) and Bt varieties, have failed to deliver promised benefits in yield and poverty reduction. It documents a significant increase in pesticide use and the emergence of herbicide-resistant weeds in the US, Argentina, and Brazil. The document further highlights the monopolization of the seed market by a few firms, specifically Monsanto, and the resulting economic pressure and legal harassment of farmers. Case studies in India, China, and South Africa suggest that yield increases are often due to weather or irrigation rather than GM technology, while small farmers face increased debt and vulnerability.

The report argues that humanity has depleted natural capital to achieve short-term gains, leading to a decline in 15 of 24 evaluated ecosystem services. It proposes a five-part action agenda: developing ecosystem service information, strengthening local community rights, managing across multiple scales, improving accountability, and aligning economic incentives. To implement this, the authors suggest creating new institutions such as Ecosystem Service Districts, Biome Stewardship Councils, a Commission on Macroeconomics and Ecosystem Services for Poverty Reduction, and a global Leaders' Forum.

The report examines the intersection of fisheries access agreements and WTO subsidy law, arguing that while the agreements themselves are not subsidies, the onward transfer of access rights from a Distant Water Fishing Nation (DWFN) to its fleet can constitute a subsidy if the fleet does not pay adequate remuneration. It highlights the negative environmental and social impacts of subsidized distant-water fishing in developing nations and proposes several regulatory options for the WTO, including clarifying the definition of access-related subsidies, introducing transparency requirements, and establishing conditional exceptions for Small Island Developing States (SIDS).

The 25th Executive Council meeting of the IAI focused on strategic planning, financial reporting, and administrative governance, including the extension of the FAC statute and the formation of a group to draft the IAI Strategic Plan.

The report details the financial status of the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) as of October 31, 2007. It highlights that 53% of approved country contributions for the 2007/2008 fiscal year had been collected, with a heavy reliance on the US, Brazil, Canada, and Mexico. The document outlines expenditures for the Collaborative Research Networks (CRN I and II), Training Institutes, and a new Small-Grants Program for Human Dimensions. It also notes in-kind contributions from Brazil totaling US$185,776.30 for the 2006/2007 fiscal year and reports a favorable external audit for the same period.

The IAI report for the period ending October 31, 2007, reveals a reliance on four major contributors (USA, Brazil, Canada, and Mexico) to maintain operations, with only 53% of approved contributions for FY 2007/2008 collected. While operating expenses were 9.4% below budget, the institute is diversifying its funding through new grants from the MacArthur Foundation and IDRC. Programmatic updates include the closure of Collaborative Research Network I (CRN I) and the implementation of CRN II and the Small Grant Program for the Human Dimensions (SGP-HD).

The IAI is managing the closure of its CRN I program and the implementation of CRN II and Small Grants Program for Human Dimensions (SGP-HD), while seeking new funding from the MacArthur Foundation and IDRC. The institute is expanding its regional network through collaborations with entities like IGBP, IUCN, and CEPAL, and is focusing on capacity building through research internships and specialized training institutes on climate risk, water management, and urban responses. Efforts to secure operational budget contributions from member countries like Guatemala and Uruguay are ongoing.

The 24th SAC Meeting, held in December 2006, focused on transitioning IAI science from individual projects to broader research programs and increasing the societal relevance of global environmental change (GEC) research. The committee identified priorities for 2007-2008, including the development of an overarching strategic plan, the integration of human dimensions research via a US$800K fund, and the need to balance scientific excellence with informed action and policy relevance. The meeting also outlined the criteria for renewing SAC membership to ensure interdisciplinary expertise in areas such as meteorology, biodiversity, urban/energy, and environment/economy.

The 24th SAC meeting, held in December 2006 in Cuernavaca, Mexico, focused on transitioning the IAI from individual projects to broader research programs. The committee emphasized increasing the social relevance of global change research, promoting interdisciplinary work between natural and social sciences, and developing a general strategic plan. The meeting also outlined the criteria for renewing SAC membership to ensure coverage of key areas such as meteorology, biodiversity, urbanization, and economics.

The External Review Committee (ERC) found that the IAI produces high-quality natural science and has successfully built scientific capacity across the Americas. However, it struggles to translate science into policy action, suffers from a narrow funding base heavily dependent on the United States, and lacks a comprehensive communication strategy and long-term strategic plan.

The document lists the attendees of the 14th IAI Conference of the Parties (CoP) Meeting and the Science Symposium, both held in Manaus, Brazil, on June 14-15, 2007. Participants included representatives from national governments, research institutions, and international bodies from Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Mexico, Panama, Paraguay, the United States, and Venezuela, as well as IAI directorate staff and external review committee members.