Search Climate Insights Directory

The City-County Building in Indianapolis underwent an $8 million energy retrofit, reducing energy usage by 46% and securing $750,000 in annual savings. This project serves as the model for the SustainIndy program, which targets a 25% energy reduction across 61 city buildings to achieve $1.7 million in annual savings over 15 years.

The report argues that the Levy and Vogtle nuclear projects carry significant financial risks for ratepayers and taxpayers due to potential cost escalations and delays. It finds that both Florida and Georgia could meet their projected energy demand growth more cost-effectively through aggressive energy efficiency targets and the development of renewable energy resources, which are presented as lower-risk and lower-cost alternatives to the Westinghouse AP1000 reactor design.

The report analyzes six case studies—onshore wind in the U.S. and Spain, solar PV in the U.S. and Italy, a solar power tower in the U.S., and offshore wind in Denmark—to determine how policy impacts the cost of finance. It identifies seven policy impact pathways, finding that the duration of revenue support and revenue certainty are the most critical factors in reducing financing costs. The analysis shows that while most projects' costs and returns align with benchmarks, the Italian PV case experienced inflated costs and returns due to a rush to qualify for a Feed-in-Premium. The report concludes that policies reducing risk and providing revenue certainty are essential for attracting institutional investors and scaling innovative technologies.

The report analyzes the potential for the Midwest to transition to a clean energy economy by adopting the Midwestern Governors Association's (MGA) targets: reducing electricity use by 2% annually and sourcing 30% of electricity from renewables by 2030. Using a modified National Energy Modeling System (NEMS), the Union of Concerned Scientists finds that these goals are achievable and would lead to significant job creation, consumer savings, and carbon emission reductions. The analysis highlights wind and biopower as the most competitive resources, while noting that transmission capacity remains a primary barrier. The report argues that regional targets would complement a federal carbon policy, making such a policy more affordable for consumers.

The document introduces a project by the Climate Policy Initiative (CPI) to analyze the impact of government policy on the development and cost reduction of solar photovoltaic (PV) technology. It identifies cost as the primary obstacle to PV's technical potential and proposes a four-step evaluation framework—linking objectives, activities, drivers, and policies—to assess policy effectiveness across the PV value chain. The briefing highlights key policy questions regarding the use of targeted versus broad-based tools, the interaction between local and national policies, and the role of capital markets in financing deployment.

The document describes a project to assess the impact of policy on clean energy financing, focusing on whether policies encourage a sustainable and cost-effective mix of investments. It highlights the role of risk allocation and the importance of project financing eligibility in determining the overall cost of energy projects. The project aims to analyze debt, equity, venture capital, and mezzanine finance across different technology maturity levels and global regions.

The Policy-Adjusted IRP 2010-2030 outlines South Africa's strategy for electricity generation expansion and demand-side management. It recommends a diversified energy mix including 9.6 GW of nuclear, 6.3 GW of new coal, and 17.8 GW of renewables (wind, solar PV, and CSP) to balance security of supply, economic growth, and carbon emission constraints. The plan emphasizes accelerating renewable energy to foster local industry and includes a Medium Term Risk Mitigation Project to address anticipated supply shortfalls between 2011 and 2016 through demand response and increased generation availability.

The report analyzes the PV sectors in Germany and China, finding that while deployment support has successfully driven installations and cost reductions, investment support is insufficiently linked to innovation, and direct R&D funding remains low relative to deployment subsidies. It argues that PV costs must be reduced by another 50% to achieve large-scale competitiveness, requiring a comprehensive value-chain approach and international policy coordination to maintain momentum as German support declines.

The document outlines the financial hazards of investing in new or retrofitted coal plants in the U.S., citing competition from natural gas and renewables, rising fuel costs, and the likelihood of future carbon pricing. It highlights that coal is no longer the low-cost option it once was and that many existing plants are inefficient and ripe for retirement. The report suggests that the U.S. can replace most coal power with renewable energy, demand reduction, and natural gas within 15 to 20 years.

The report examines the 'water-energy nexus' in the western United States, specifically the eleven states of the Western Electric Coordinating Council (WECC). It models eight scenarios from 2008 to 2100, varying by carbon emission goals, water conservation mandates, and energy efficiency levels. The primary finding is that while power plants require water, their total consumption is small compared to agricultural and urban use, making the water-energy nexus a secondary concern in the region's broader water crisis. The analysis suggests that carbon pricing (around $70 per ton) is a more likely driver for shifting energy strategies than water pricing, as water prices would need to exceed $4,000 to $7,000 per acre-foot to make water-conserving energy scenarios the least-cost option.

The document provides a comparative analysis of U.S. renewable energy resources—including hydropower, wind, biomass, geothermal, and solar—alongside conventional coal, natural gas, and nuclear power. It details installed capacities, capital costs per kilowatt, and carbon displacement estimates as of 2009-2010, noting that renewables are generally lower in carbon emissions, more flexible in scale, and faster to construct than conventional plants.

The document argues that technological innovation, particularly in the electricity sector, is essential for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, but is currently hindered by high risks and long investment cycles. It highlights that while solar PV has seen rapid growth driven by European feed-in tariffs and US tax incentives, carbon capture and storage (CCS) remains stalled in the 'valley of death' due to insufficient funding and political commitment for large-scale demonstration. The authors emphasize the need for a combination of 'push' (R&D) and 'pull' (market creation) mechanisms to ensure sustainable technological scaling and suggest that market formation must expand beyond Europe to ensure global stability for these industries.

The report argues that while solar PV module costs have declined aggressively, balance of system (BoS) costs—which account for about half of total installed costs—remain a significant barrier to adoption. Through a design charrette with industry experts, the report proposes a 'systems approach' focusing on physical design, business processes, and industry scaling to reduce BoS costs to $0.60–0.90/watt. Key recommendations include optimizing structural designs to reduce wind forces, rethinking electrical architectures through high-voltage aggregation and module-integrated electronics, streamlining permitting and interconnection processes to reduce project 'dropouts', and adopting high-volume lean manufacturing and component standardization.

The document details the 1984 construction of Amory Lovins's home, which utilized superinsulation, thermal mass, and passive solar design to eliminate the need for a conventional HVAC system. By focusing on functional end-uses rather than standard building codes, the design achieved a 99% reduction in space heating energy and a 90% reduction in electricity use compared to a conventional home of the same vintage. The study highlights that the capital costs of high-performance components were offset by the elimination of expensive heating equipment, resulting in a net construction cost increase of only 1% and a payback period of approximately six months based on 1983-84 prices.

Ohio experienced a significant economic drain in 2008 due to its heavy reliance on imported coal, spending a net $1.49 billion on these imports. The document highlights that coal provided 85.2% of the state's electricity in 2008 and suggests that transitioning to energy efficiency and homegrown renewables, such as wind and solar, can stimulate local economic development and increase energy independence.

The report describes Feed-in Tariffs (FITs) as a policy tool to accelerate renewable energy deployment by providing guaranteed, long-term payment rates and grid access to producers. It highlights successful implementations in Denmark and Germany, while noting that Spain's high rates led to overinvestment and a subsequent global drop in solar panel prices. In the US, the report notes a lack of federal policy but identifies local efforts in Gainesville, Florida, and California, concluding with design recommendations such as using trial phases and binding caps to avoid windfall profits.

The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) argues that augmenting the American Clean Energy and Security Act (ACES) with a higher renewable electricity standard (RES) of 25% by 2025 and a 10% energy efficiency resource standard (EERS) by 2020 would reduce consumer energy costs, lower carbon allowance prices, and diversify the U.S. electric power mix. Using the National Energy Modeling System, the analysis finds that this 'RES/EERS Case' would save consumers $113 billion in electricity and natural gas expenditures through 2030 compared to the ACES Basic Case, while avoiding the need for nearly 50 new nuclear power reactors. The report concludes that these complementary policies, combined with a national carbon cap, accelerate the transition to a clean energy economy without significantly impacting GDP.

The author contends that the perceived intractability of nuclear proliferation, climate change, and oil dependence stems from a mistaken assumption that climate protection and oil displacement are costly. By applying 'integrative design' and 'micropower' (cogeneration and renewables), the author argues that energy efficiency and distributed generation are more profitable, faster to deploy, and more effective than nuclear power. Specifically, the paper asserts that phasing out nuclear power is a necessary condition for nonproliferation because civilian nuclear infrastructure provides the materials and knowledge required for weapons. The author proposes that the U.S. should reform the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) by redefining the obligations under Article IV to provide developing nations with efficient, non-nuclear energy security rather than nuclear technology.

The document examines how a hypothetical carbon price of 3000¥/t would affect Japanese industry, identifying 17 subsectors at risk. While findings align with similar studies in the UK, Germany, and USA, the Japanese pig iron subsector is noted as being disproportionately affected. However, the overall impact on the competitiveness of final products like flat steel is expected to be minimal compared to other trade influences.

Amory B. Lovins critiques Stewart Brand's advocacy for nuclear power, asserting that nuclear energy is economically uncompetitive and slower to deploy than decentralized renewables and efficiency measures. Lovins argues that nuclear power's high capital costs and financial risks make it a poor investment for climate protection, noting that it saves significantly less carbon per dollar and is deployed much slower than alternatives. He refutes claims regarding the necessity of 'baseload' power, the land-use footprint of renewables, and the need for a diverse energy portfolio that includes nuclear power, concluding that the technology's failure to attract private equity in the U.S. demonstrates its lack of market viability.