Search Climate Insights Directory

The document provides evidence that major fossil-fuel companies had internal knowledge of anthropogenic climate change as early as the 1950s and 1960s, yet spent decades funding disinformation to manufacture public doubt. It details how these companies protected their own infrastructure from sea-level rise while publicly denying the science, and argues that current 'greenwashing' and 'carbon footprint' narratives continue this pattern of deception.

The guide outlines strategies for maximizing productivity at a COP, including how to use different access passes, the importance of daily planning across overlapping agendas, and techniques for professional networking. It emphasizes the value of attending negotiations as an observer to track national delegations and suggests practical tips such as wearing comfortable shoes and using digital business cards.

The Center for Climate Integrity asserts that a leaked video of senior Exxon lobbyist Keith McCoy proves ExxonMobil systematically lies about climate science, its products' role in the climate crisis, and its commitment to climate solutions to protect its profits.

The authors argue that the Trump Administration exploited ambiguities in conflict-of-interest rules to sideline scientists and prioritize industry interests. To counter this, they recommend establishing statutory job qualifications for high-level positions, closing 'revolving door' loopholes, and creating firewalls between political staff and agency scientists. They also propose reforming the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) to prevent the appointment of conflicted members and enhancing the transparency of the scientific peer review process. Finally, the paper calls for strengthening the independence of Inspectors General and granting the Office of Government Ethics (OGE) investigative authority to ensure effective enforcement of ethics laws.

The Clean Air Task Force criticizes the EPA under Andrew Wheeler for rushing through rules that support "uncontrolled generation" and disregard climate science and public health. The author argues that the EPA is ignoring statutory protections and legal requirements, such as the APA and CRA, to implement rollbacks on methane, ozone, coal ash, and carbon rules before the administration's tenure ends, vowing that these actions will be challenged in court.

The Union of Concerned Scientists and UCI Law propose a framework to safeguard federal science from political, ideological, and financial influences. The roadmap focuses on reforming political appointments, strengthening the peer-review process, ensuring the balance of federal advisory committees, and preserving the independence of Offices of Inspector General.

The report identifies a significant 'Valley of Death' between the production of climate science and its practical application in resilience and adaptation. While short-term forecasting is generally accurate and used, decadal information is urgently needed but largely unavailable, leading some practitioners to misuse long-term projections. The study argues that a 'science-first' approach is ineffective and recommends that the CLARE programme adopt a user-driven, transdisciplinary structure that prioritizes co-production, capacity building for 'discerning users', and the development of knowledge brokers to bridge the gap between scientists and decision-makers.

The document consists of three open letters from members of the US National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. The 2025 statement warns that the US scientific enterprise is being 'decimated' by the Trump administration through funding cuts, censorship, and the removal of public access to data. It highlights a 'climate of fear' where researchers remove terms like 'climate change' from papers to avoid funding risks. The 2018 and 2016 letters specifically address the dangers of human-caused climate change and criticize the US withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, asserting that climate change is a 'physical reality' and that the US risks losing its global leadership and economic edge by ignoring scientific evidence.

White House officials prevented Rod Schoonover, a senior analyst at the State Department’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research, from submitting written testimony to the House Intelligence Committee because it contained scientific information on climate change. Despite the hearing's focus on the national security implications of climate change, officials from the Office of Legislative Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, and the National Security Council removed sections titled "Scientific Baseline" and "Stresses to Human and Societal Systems." The document asserts that this suppression was driven by a desire to align testimony with the Trump administration's positions and was supported by climate science deniers like William Happer. The suppression included the removal of data from the IPCC, NASA, and NOAA, with White House officials characterizing scientific consensus as "climate-alarm propaganda."

A 2018 survey of 561 US Geological Survey (USGS) scientists indicates that while 85% believe the agency adheres to its scientific integrity policy, there is significant evidence of politicization. Key issues include the diversion of resources away from politically contentious research, restrictions on professional development, and the self-censorship or explicit removal of the phrase "climate change" from scientific work.

The document details a campaign by scientists and lawmakers to pressure the American Geophysical Union (AGU) to end its sponsorship relationship with ExxonMobil, which provided over $620,000 between 2001 and 2015. While AGU initially refused to cut ties in April 2016, citing an inability to unequivocally determine current misinformation, ExxonMobil was absent from the 2016 fall meeting sponsor list. The text notes that AGU continues to accept funding from other fossil fuel companies, such as Chevron.

Scientists for Global Responsibility and other campaign organisations condemn the sponsorship of 'New Scientist Live' by Shell and BAE Systems, arguing that such partnerships provide unethical companies with unmerited social legitimacy and allow them to deflect from their environmental and human rights impacts.

The document asserts that the Paris Agreement is a universal and flexible framework essential for stabilizing global temperature increases below 2°C. It characterizes the U.S. decision to withdraw as an "historical mistake" that could increase future global temperature rises by up to 0.3°C and isolate the U.S. internationally. However, the authors note that a "domino effect" of other nations withdrawing has not occurred, as key players like China, the European Union, and India remain committed. The text highlights that the transition to clean energy is driven by economic opportunity, noting support from major U.S. companies, the divestment from coal by Blackrock, and the competitiveness of renewables, exemplified by subsidy-free auctions in Spain. Internal U.S. opposition is also noted, specifically from the governors of California, New York, and Washington.

The authors assert that the Paris Agreement's universal and flexible design allows it to persist despite the United States' withdrawal. While the US exit is described as a historical mistake that could increase global temperatures by up to 0.3°C, the authors note that key players like China, the EU, and India remain committed. They highlight that the transition to clean energy is driven by economic opportunities, with major US companies and financial institutions like Blackrock divesting from fossil fuels and supporting the agreement for the sake of stability. Additionally, internal US opposition from governors in California, New York, and Washington suggests a continued domestic effort to reduce emissions.

Scientists for Global Responsibility (SGR) supports the March for Science, advocating for science that serves the common good rather than those in power. The organization criticizes the US government for suppressing climate science and ignoring evidence, while also warning against the power of large corporations and the fossil fuel industry to shape research agendas and undermine scientific evidence.

The statement advocates for a pragmatic, hope-driven approach to the energy transition, asserting that the shift toward low-carbon energy is now globally supported and commercially viable, making it largely irreversible regardless of U.S. political shifts.

The document describes a process for integrating climate science, social analysis, and emergency response to improve decision-making after extreme weather events. It emphasizes the need for policy makers and officials to determine how to rebuild and prepare for future climate shifts by utilizing both historical experience and scientific data on climate change.

The World Resources Institute (WRI) warns that the appointment of Scott Pruitt to lead the EPA threatens the agency's ability to protect public health and the climate, citing Pruitt's record of questioning climate science and fighting emissions reductions.

Friends of the Earth International issued a statement from its 2016 Biennial General Meeting in Indonesia rejecting the election of Donald Trump. The organization condemns his rhetoric against marginalized groups and his 'climate denialism', which they argue threatens global progress on climate action. The statement links the rise of such political trends to the failures of neo-liberalism and corporate globalization, while expressing solidarity with progressive resistance movements in the United States.

The March 2016 survey indicates that 70% of Americans believe global warming is happening, with an increase in the proportion of people who are 'very worried' and perceive it as a current or future threat to themselves and others. While 53% attribute global warming to human causes, only 11% are aware of the scientific consensus. There is broad support for greenhouse gas emission reductions in the U.S. and for teaching children about global warming, though confidence in the U.S. Congress's ability to pass necessary legislation remains low at 37%.