Search Climate Insights Directory

The report examines the expansion of transnational corporations (TNCs) in Latin America and the Caribbean, specifically within the agro-industrial and energy sectors. It argues that neoliberal state reforms, free trade agreements, and investment treaties since the 1990s have facilitated the concentration of power, leading to the displacement of small-scale farmers, environmental degradation, and systemic violence. The document highlights a gendered dimension to these impacts, noting that women face severe restrictions on land ownership and increased vulnerability to violence. It concludes by proposing strategies for resistance, including the promotion of food sovereignty, agroecology, and the pursuit of a legally binding UN treaty to end corporate impunity.

The document examines the expansion of transnational corporations (TNCs) in Latin America and the Caribbean, specifically within the energy and agriculture sectors. It argues that neoliberal reforms, free trade agreements, and the dismantling of state institutions have enabled TNCs to control territories, leading to widespread dispossession, environmental degradation, and human rights violations. The report highlights a systemic pattern of anti-democratic governance and a specific, severe impact on women's rights and land tenure. It concludes by proposing strategies for resistance, including the promotion of food sovereignty, agroecology, and the establishment of a UN Binding Treaty on Human Rights and Transnational Corporations.

The statement condemns the Israeli government's decision to label six Palestinian civil society organizations as terrorists and 'unauthorized,' arguing that this is an escalation of the criminalization of human rights defenders. It highlights the role of these organizations in protecting land, water, and human rights under occupation, specifically mentioning the Union of Agricultural Work Committees (UAWC) and its work in the West Bank. The signatories call on the international community to pressure Israel to end the occupation and respect international law.

The document details Liberia's transition from outdated 'scoop and ship' agricultural contracts to a more transparent, regulated framework for foreign direct investment. Key reforms included the Public Procurement and Concessions Act of 2005 and the Investment Act of 2010, which established inter-agency coordination and a model template for negotiations. The government also introduced the National Concessions Portal of Liberia for land-use monitoring and mandated community development committees to ensure local benefits. The case emphasizes the importance of translating agreements into simple language and involving local authorities to ensure meaningful community engagement.

The document emphasizes the need for communication professionals to prioritize the safety and dignity of Indigenous peoples, particularly in the Americas. It warns against 'parachute journalism' and the risks associated with public disclosure, advocating for constant consultation, respect for traditional authorities, and the avoidance of colonialist or discriminatory imagery.

The document argues against the exoticization and generalization of Indigenous peoples and their environments, specifically criticizing the 'white savior' narrative and the use of staged imagery. It emphasizes the need to represent the diversity of forests beyond the Amazon and to acknowledge the cultural and climatic adaptations of Indigenous communities in various settings, including urban and industrial areas. The guide advocates for narratives driven by the voices of Indigenous people themselves to protect their dignity and prevent the social segregation and land dispossession that result from harmful stereotypes.

The document introduces a guide of eight principles for Indigenous media presence, developed to counter the risks of simplification, sensationalism, and stereotypes in climate-related narratives. Based on research and consultations with Indigenous leaders, photographers, and NGOs across 10 countries in Meso and South America, the project aims to move beyond mere representation toward a lasting, positive, and impactful media presence that supports Indigenous self-determination and climate justice.

The document advises media to move away from generic terms like "local" and instead promote a "real sense of place" by focusing on specific Indigenous Territories and the daily lives of their communities. It suggests using material and sensory details—such as a single tree or riverbank—to create familiarity and intimacy, rather than focusing on spectacular sights that cater to tourist expectations. The text emphasizes that photography in these contexts should be viewed as a relational act requiring permission from the "owners of the forest" and the spirits, reflecting the deep cosmological meanings associated with the land.

The document advocates for a slow, immersive approach to content creation, emphasizing long-term engagement with indigenous communities over short-term gains. It highlights the importance of understanding local perspectives and natural cycles to accurately represent the role of ancient forests in preserving ancestral cultures and combating climate change. The text provides examples of long-term commitment, such as Claudia Andujar's work with the Yanomami since 1971 and Josué Rivas's coverage of the Standing Rock protests, to illustrate how deep immersion leads to more authentic and impactful storytelling.

The document outlines the necessity of prioritizing the safety and well-being of Indigenous peoples when producing media content. It warns against 'parachute journalism' and emphasizes the need for constant communication with communities to avoid exposing them to risks through photography, recordings, or public disclosures. The guide advocates for respecting traditional authorities, recognizing legal land titles (Territories), and avoiding colonialist imagery that perpetuates discrimination.

The report analyzes the economic drivers of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon, comparing land price dynamics and cattle production inside and outside the Amazon biome. It finds that while cattle growth outside the Amazon is driven by meat and milk demand (increasing land prices), growth within the Amazon is strongly linked to land grabbing, which increases the supply of land and reduces its price. The authors argue that policies focusing solely on cattle productivity are insufficient for the Amazon; instead, addressing land grabbing and improving land security are critical to decoupling beef production from deforestation.

The report argues that deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon is primarily driven by land grabbing rather than food demand. This is evidenced by a negative correlation between cattle herd growth and land prices in the Amazon, contrasting with the positive correlation found in other Brazilian regions. The authors conclude that policies focusing solely on productivity are insufficient and that land tenure security is essential to decouple cattle production from deforestation.

The report consists of several independent briefers analyzing how climate change acts as a threat multiplier across various domains. Key analyses include the evolution of 'environmental terrorism' from a tactical to a strategic threat, the need to integrate peacebuilding with climate adaptation in fragile regions like the Sahel, and the shifting geopolitics of energy security as the world transitions to renewables. It also assesses specific vulnerabilities of U.S. Space Force infrastructure to sea-level rise and wildfires, the role of digital Earth observation technologies in anticipatory intelligence, and the gendered impacts of climate-induced resource scarcity. Regional case studies focus on the Arctic's changing geopolitical landscape and the influence of media reporting on climate-induced farmer-herder conflicts in Nigeria.

The report finds that while the Paris Agreement has integrated forests into the international climate agenda, current national actions are insufficient to stop forest loss and greenhouse gas emissions by 2030. It argues that governments must increase the ambition of their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), align financial flows with climate goals, and implement six core strategies: strengthening governance, protecting indigenous land rights, aligning incentives, promoting multi-stakeholder collaboration, ensuring robust monitoring, and implementing demand-side measures in importing countries.

The report finds that while the Paris Agreement has integrated forests into the international climate agenda, national ambitions in NDCs remain insufficient and often lack quantitative targets. Public finance for forest climate goals is a small fraction of the required amount, with 'grey' finance for deforestation-driving sectors vastly outweighing 'green' investments. While many countries have established REDD+ programs and robust monitoring systems, implementation is hindered by weak governance, widespread illegality, and a lack of secure land tenure for Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLCs). The report recommends scaling up domestic and international finance, strengthening land rights, and expanding demand-side regulations in consumer countries to curb illegal deforestation.

The report examines the governance trajectories of Kenya, Mozambique, and Uganda, the only three African countries to have completed the APRM review process twice. It finds that while all three made legislative and constitutional strides in democracy and political governance, they remain vulnerable to ethnic conflict and struggle with persistent issues of corruption, poverty, and gender inequality.

The report argues that community lands, managed by Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLCs), are critical for climate mitigation due to their ability to sequester carbon and maintain biodiversity. Despite managing approximately half of the world's land, only 10% is legally recognized. The document provides evidence that secure land tenure leads to lower deforestation rates compared to state-managed lands and is a cost-effective mitigation strategy. However, these lands face increasing threats from illegal mining, drug trafficking, and land grabbing, while land defenders face rising violence. The report concludes that international climate finance significantly underserves IPLCs and calls for governments to prioritize legal land titling and the protection of environmental defenders.

The document argues that community lands, which cover approximately half of the world's land, are critical for carbon sequestration and biodiversity. It highlights that secure land tenure for IPLCs leads to lower deforestation rates and more effective climate mitigation than state-managed areas, often at a lower cost. However, the report notes that most community land lacks legal recognition, IPLCs receive less than 1% of official development assistance for climate change, and land defenders face increasing violence. It recommends securing land rights, improving law enforcement, and directing international climate funds toward IPLC-led management.

The document examines three climate adaptation projects by the W8banaki Nation: lake sturgeon habitat restoration, medicinal plant preservation, and riverbank erosion assessment. It highlights the importance of integrating traditional Indigenous knowledge with western science and argues for flexible, long-term, community-led funding models over rigid, top-down provincial programs.

The document advocates for the inclusion of human rights protections in the EU's upcoming legislation on forest and ecosystem-risk commodities (FERCs). It argues that deforestation is intrinsically linked to human rights abuses, particularly against Indigenous Peoples, and that protecting these rights is essential for effective forest conservation. The briefing proposes a product-based due diligence framework with a 'negligible risk' threshold, mandatory investigation of land tenure and free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC), and rights of redress before EU courts. To demonstrate feasibility, it provides case studies of Brazilian beef supply chains involving JBS and Marfrig, showing that human rights risks can be identified using publicly available digital information.