Search Climate Insights Directory

The Lima Work Programme on Gender (LWPG) has been extended until 2035, following decisions at COP29 in Baku. Parties are now working toward a new Gender Action Plan (GAP) to be developed at COP30, with initial design discussions and technical workshops having taken place at SB62 in June. Key areas of focus include gender-responsive climate finance, intersectionality, and the strengthening of national gender and climate focal points, though disagreements persist over the extent of gender integration in climate policy.

The Human Rights and Climate Change Working Group and associated organisations call on EU leadership to champion human rights within the Paris Agreement. They argue that climate change disproportionately affects vulnerable populations and that climate actions themselves can cause human rights abuses without safeguards. The letter specifically requests support for an amended Article 2(2) of the draft text to recognise the protection of human rights, indigenous peoples' rights, gender equality, and a just transition for the workforce.

The document outlines essential communication tips for framing health and education as climate solutions. It emphasizes the intersection of gender equality, universal education, and sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) in mitigating climate change and poverty. Key guidance includes recognizing the disproportionate impact of climate change on women and girls in emerging economies, framing education as a basic human right, and advocating for full bodily autonomy without promoting coercive fertility limits.

A position paper by Friends of the Earth International arguing that achieving food sovereignty requires dismantling patriarchy and strengthening women as political subjects, specifically through feminist policies and agroecology.

A position paper by Friends of the Earth International advocating for the integration of a feminist perspective into the pursuit of food sovereignty, emphasizing the need to dismantle patriarchy and implement agroecology based on equal power relations.

The document argues that community forest management (CFM) is a more effective strategy for forest conservation and poverty reduction than industrial logging or strict state protection. It identifies seven key rights—state obligations, self-determination, consultation, territorial rights, livelihoods and economic development, women's rights, and cultural/traditional knowledge—and maps these against international legal frameworks to provide a tool for advocates to pressure governments for the legal recognition of community-led forestry.

The report argues that while state and private ownership still dominate global forests, community forest management (CFM) is a more effective strategy for forest conservation, poverty reduction, and climate mitigation. It identifies a set of key rights—including territorial, consultation, and cultural rights—that underpin successful CFM and maps these against 17 international agreements, such as the UN Declaration on the Rights of Peasants and UNDRIP. The document concludes that while no single agreement mandates the creation of community forests, the collective weight of these international norms provides a strong legal and moral basis for states to devolve forest authority to local communities.

The report argues that community forest management, based on traditional knowledge and collective rights, is essential for biodiversity conservation and social justice. It contrasts this with industrial logging and monoculture plantations, which it links to neoliberal globalization, international financial institution funding, and the marginalization of indigenous peoples. Through case studies from Asia, Africa, and the Americas, it demonstrates how local control of resources can ensure food sovereignty, climate resilience, and poverty alleviation.

The document argues that community forest management (CFM) is a highly effective strategy for forest conservation and poverty reduction, yet it remains under-supported by governments. It identifies seven key rights—state obligations, self-determination, consultation, territorial rights, livelihoods/economic development, women's rights, and cultural/traditional knowledge—and maps these against international legal frameworks to provide advocates with tools to pressure governments for the legal recognition of community-led forestry.

AquaMnara, supported by FSD Africa's TECA project, provides aquaculture farmers in Kisumu, Kenya, with technical support, value chain linkages, and financial facilitation to improve climate resilience and production. The startup focuses on sustainable practices, water quality management, and empowering women in the sector through a dedicated 'women in aquaculture' programme.

The document details how BCP, through its subsidiary Attawfiq Micro-Finance, used a USD 25 million gender bond to provide micro-credits and non-financial services to women in Morocco. It highlights the barriers women face—such as lack of collateral, cultural norms, and limited financial literacy—and demonstrates how targeted micro-credit has enabled women in both rural and urban areas to expand businesses and escape poverty. While the initiative shows success in financial inclusion, the text notes that investor focus on yield over social impact and rigorous reporting requirements remain challenges for the growth of social bonds.

EcoBodaa is a Kenyan tech startup developing electric motorcycles tailored for the local market to replace petrol-powered bikes. Supported by Persistent Energy, the company has developed bikes with localized battery configurations and GPS systems, achieving maintenance costs up to 80% lower than petrol alternatives. While the company has struggled to recruit women as riders, it has appointed five women to leadership roles. EcoBodaa utilizes a rent-to-own model and an energy micropayment system to improve financial accessibility, and it is now 90% ready for scaling after selling 37 units.

The document details the impact of FSD Africa's BimaLab accelerator on Soso Care in Nigeria. Soso Care provides health micro-insurance to low-income earners who pay premiums using recyclable waste. Through BimaLab's non-monetary support, Soso Care optimized operations and formed strategic partnerships with entities such as AXA, AIICO, Wema Bank, and the Port Harcourt Municipal Government. The initiative also emphasizes gender equality, with women making up 70-80% of Soso Care's 600+ agents and supporting 7,000 women through income-generating opportunities.

FSD Africa invested US$4.5 million into Nithio FI, an AI-driven climate finance platform that provides receivables-backed financing to off-grid solar companies. As of June 2023, Nithio had committed $26.5 million in total capital and extended $19.8 million in loan commitments across ten investments. The initiative has improved energy access for nearly 244,000 people, supported 5,636 entrepreneurs, and deployed nearly 80,000 energy systems, resulting in a reduction of 665,654 metric tons of CO2 emissions. Nithio specifically targets 'tier 3' local firms—smaller companies that have grown through bootstrapping—and utilizes a Risk Analytics Engine for credit risk assessment and gender-disaggregated impact tracking.

Persistent Energy Capital provides equity and venture-building support to small, under-resourced green companies in Sub-Saharan Africa, starting with investments as low as $50,000. To date, the fund has invested $23 million across 23 companies in 22 countries, contributing to the elimination of 1.4 million tons of CO2 and the creation of over 21,700 jobs. With support from FSD Africa Investments (FSDAi), Persistent is currently raising a US$100 million Africa Climate Venture Builder Fund to expand its reach into sectors such as agritech, circular economy, waste management, and water and sanitation.

The document serves as a technical resource for designing and issuing gender bonds in Africa, aligning with International Capital Market Association (ICMA) standards. It details the issuance process for both use-of-proceeds (UoP) and performance-based bonds, emphasizing the need for gender-disaggregated data, internal working groups, and external reviews. The guide highlights the growth of the gender bond market in Africa, citing recent issuances in Morocco, Rwanda, South Africa, and Tanzania, and provides case studies and frameworks to help issuers direct capital toward women-owned MSMEs, housing, and leadership diversity.

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) has developed Performance Measurement Frameworks (PMFs) to quantify and qualify the impacts of its climate mitigation and adaptation investments. The frameworks utilize a combination of quantitative and qualitative indicators, including gender-disaggregated data, to track progress toward low-emission and climate-resilient development pathways. Mitigation metrics focus on CO2 equivalent reductions across energy, transport, buildings, and forestry, while adaptation metrics measure beneficiary reach, risk reduction, and the resilience of infrastructure and ecosystems.

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) has recommended the re-accreditation of Namibia's Environmental Investment Fund (EIF) for a second term, maintaining its status as a national direct access entity for 'micro' projects (up to USD 10 million). While the EIF demonstrates strong alignment with GCF's climate mandates and robust environmental and social safeguards, the assessment identified significant gaps in financial reporting, project monitoring, and internal audit track records. The recommendation for re-accreditation is subject to several conditions, including updating the Gender Equality Charter and improving the monitoring of grant awards to executing entities.

The GCF Environmental and Social Policy defines a comprehensive framework for managing environmental and social risks across all GCF-financed activities. It mandates that accredited entities maintain an Environmental and Social Management System (ESMS) and adhere to a mitigation hierarchy to avoid, minimize, or compensate for adverse impacts. The policy introduces a risk-based categorization system (Categories A, B, and C for activities; I1, I2, and I3 for intermediaries) to determine the depth of required assessments and stakeholder engagement. Key protections are specified for indigenous peoples, including the requirement for free, prior and informed consent in applicable circumstances, as well as safeguards for human rights, gender equality, and biodiversity. The framework also establishes a three-tier grievance redress system operating at the GCF, accredited entity, and activity levels.

The GCF's Environmental and Social Policy defines the requirements for accredited entities to identify, assess, and mitigate environmental and social risks. It mandates a risk-based approach using Environmental and Social Safeguards (SAS), a mitigation hierarchy, and rigorous due diligence. The policy emphasizes the protection of vulnerable groups, indigenous peoples, and biodiversity, while requiring transparent information disclosure and the establishment of grievance redress mechanisms at the activity, entity, and fund levels.