Search Climate Insights Directory

ClientEarth argues that State aid for IPCEIs must be strictly conditioned on compliance with EU environmental law and the 'do no harm' principle. The organization specifically advocates for the exclusion of fossil fuel projects and non-renewable hydrogen from aid eligibility, while calling for increased transparency in the Commission's State aid decisional process and the use of competitive procedures for selecting beneficiaries.

The report examines KKR's energy investment strategy from 2010 to 2020, highlighting a strong preference for fossil fuels over renewables. It details significant financial losses, including negative internal rates of return (IRR) for several funds and bankruptcies of assets like Longview Power and Samson Resources. Additionally, the document links KKR's investments to environmental and social harms, specifically citing Indigenous opposition to the Coastal GasLink Pipeline in Canada and the disproportionate impact of oil and gas operations on Latino and minority communities in Texas and New Mexico.

The report assesses South Africa's natural gas value chain, identifying a current energy mix contribution of 2.6% with a target of 15.7% by 2030. It evaluates domestic reserves in basins such as the Orange and Outeniqua, regional supply options from SADC countries—particularly Mozambique—and global LNG markets. The document prioritizes gas-to-power projects as anchor demand to stimulate infrastructure growth, while also exploring industrial and transport applications like CNG for taxis and buses. It concludes with a PESTEL and SWOT analysis to inform a national roadmap for gas sector reforms.

The document advises journalists to treat COP26 with urgency, framing coverage around the 1.5 C temperature goal, climate justice, and the political barriers to solutions. It emphasizes the need for advance coverage and the localization of global climate impacts to make the summit relevant to diverse audiences.

A March 2021 survey of 922 registered U.S. voters reveals broad support for clean energy research, tax rebates for energy-efficient products, and conservation jobs programs. While majorities support transitioning to 100% clean energy by 2050 and regulating carbon dioxide, significant political divisions persist regarding the economic impact of clean energy and the use of national emergency declarations. Voters generally believe corporations and government should do more to address global warming, though confidence in the ability of state and local governments to protect communities remains low.

The report finds that private equity energy funds have consistently underperformed broader private equity benchmarks, with many losing money. This is attributed to high bankruptcy rates among debt-laden private equity-backed oil and gas companies, a collapse in buyer demand for fossil fuel assets, and a global transition toward renewable energy. The document highlights that the COVID-19 pandemic accelerated these trends, leading to a 'structural shift' where fossil fuel demand is unlikely to return to pre-pandemic levels.

The document urges French financial regulators (ACPR and AMF) to implement stricter oversight of fossil fuel financing, combat greenwashing in ESG products, and integrate climate risks into prudential requirements and fiduciary duties to align the financial sector with a 1.5°C trajectory.

The text compares 'Say on Climate' initiatives—where companies submit their own strategies for shareholder votes—with shareholder-led climate resolutions. It argues that for companies like Total SE, 'Say on Climate' can act as a 'distraction' or 'diversion' that allows management to legitimize 'watered down' or 'incrementalist' strategies. The author contends that only shareholder-led resolutions allow investors to 'define the terms of debate' and push for strategies compatible with viable climate trajectories, citing the 2020 resolution at Total SE as a positive example.

The authors propose a strategic approach to prevent Arctic oil exploration by leveraging technological spillovers. They argue that if environmentally friendly nations collectively refrain from extraction, the costs of entry will remain high, thereby deterring other countries from developing Arctic fossil fuels and avoiding a 'snowball effect' of increased exploitation.

The text proposes a unilateral strategy to prevent Arctic oil exploration by leveraging technological spillovers. It suggests that if greener countries coordinate to avoid extraction, they can keep costs high enough to discourage less environmentally concerned nations from entering the region. Norway, Canada, and potentially the U.S. are identified as pivotal actors in this strategy.

A group of climate and social justice organizations has called on Blackstone Group to end its financing of fossil fuels and deforestation. The letter demands a plan to achieve a net-zero energy portfolio, the disclosure of Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions for energy holdings, and a commitment to invest the majority of new energy capital in renewables by 2025. Additionally, the signatories urge Blackstone to disclose all corporate and executive political spending and ensure its lobbying activities align with a 1.5 degree scenario from the Paris Agreement.

A group of organizations urges the Carlyle Group to transition its portfolio to net-zero energy, disclose Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions, and ensure that a majority of new energy capital is invested in renewables by 2025. The letter also calls for transparency regarding political contributions and lobbying to ensure alignment with the Paris Agreement and a just transition for impacted workers and communities.

A group of climate and social justice organizations has called on Global Infrastructure Partners to transition its multi-billion dollar portfolio to a pollution-free energy system. The letter demands the disclosure of Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions for current and future holdings, a commitment to invest a majority of new energy capital in renewables by 2025, and the implementation of a just transition program for impacted workers and communities. Additionally, the signatories urge the firm to disclose all corporate and executive political spending and ensure its lobbying activities align with a 1.5 degree scenario from the Paris Agreement.

A group of organizations urges KKR to end its financing of fossil fuels and deforestation, demanding a plan for a net-zero energy portfolio and transparency regarding political contributions. The letter calls for the disclosure of Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions for energy holdings and a commitment that a majority of new energy capital be invested in renewables by 2025, with a total transition by 2030. Additionally, the signatories demand a just transition program for impacted workers and communities and the alignment of corporate lobbying with the 1.5 degree scenario of the Paris Agreement.

A group of climate and social justice organizations has called on Riverstone Holdings to end its financing of fossil fuels and deforestation. The letter demands a transition to a net-zero energy portfolio, including the disclosure of Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions and a commitment to invest the majority of new energy capital in renewables by 2025. Additionally, the signatories urge the firm to disclose all corporate and executive political spending to ensure alignment with a 1.5 degree scenario from the Paris Agreement and to implement a just transition program for impacted workers and communities.

A group of climate and social justice organizations has issued a formal demand to TPG Capital to end its financing of fossil fuels and deforestation. The letter calls for the firm to develop a net-zero energy portfolio, disclose Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions for energy holdings, and ensure a just transition for impacted workers and communities. Additionally, the signatories urge TPG Capital to publish its political spending policies and ensure that lobbying activities by the firm and its portfolio companies align with a 1.5 degree scenario from the Paris Agreement.

The Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) published climate scenarios in June 2020 to help manage financial climate risks. However, analysis by Oil Change International and Reclaim Finance suggests these scenarios have dangerous shortcomings, specifically by prioritizing 2°C targets over 1.5°C and relying on unrealistic levels of carbon capture. These assumptions create a bias in favor of continued fossil fuel production and investment, potentially slowing the global fight against climate change.

Reclaim Finance and Oil Change International critique the NGFS's initial climate scenarios for focusing on 2°C targets rather than 1.5°C and for relying on unrealistic levels of carbon capture. The authors contend that these choices create a bias in favor of fossil fuels, with some scenarios allowing coal use beyond 2050 and only modest reductions in fossil fuel investments. They call for a revised framework that centers a 1.5°C scenario and encourages financial regulators to end support for the fossil fuel sector.

The document explains that human activities, primarily the burning of fossil fuels, are the main drivers of global warming, which has seen average global temperatures rise by about one degree Celsius since 1880. It details the resulting environmental impacts, such as rising sea levels, ocean acidification, and increased frequency of extreme weather events, while highlighting the specific vulnerability of the United States to billion-dollar disasters. The text outlines mitigation and adaptation strategies, including the transition to renewable energy and energy efficiency, and discusses the role of international agreements like the Paris Agreement and the influence of climate finance in supporting these transitions.

The report examines China's green finance landscape, identifying a significant gap between current investment levels and the estimated USD 1.4 trillion annual investment needed over the next decade to meet 2015 climate and environmental targets. While green credit and bonds saw success during the 13th Five-Year Plan, finance remains heavily dominated by the public sector, with at least 51% of total green finance coming from public sources, primarily Central State Owned Enterprises and state-owned banks. The document highlights barriers for private capital, such as high 'search costs' and limited access to financing channels, and notes that half of the USD 292 billion in energy-related investments to Belt and Road Initiative countries between 2013 and 2019 went to fossil fuels. It recommends increasing the ambition of green standards, improving project pipeline visibility for private actors, and introducing mandatory exclusion lists for high-emission sectors.