Search Climate Insights Directory

The report finds that a majority of Americans perceive U.S. weather as having worsened in recent years, with 58% believing global warming affects U.S. weather. A high percentage of the population (85%) reported experiencing extreme weather in the past year, most commonly high winds and extreme heat. The document details regional variations in weather experiences and identifies public priorities for government protection of infrastructure, such as water supplies and transportation, against extreme weather over the next decade.

The April 2013 report 'Extreme Weather and Climate Change in the American Mind' reveals that 58% of Americans believe global warming is affecting U.S. weather. A significant majority (85%) reported experiencing extreme weather in the past year, with 37% stating they suffered moderate or great harm. While over half of Americans believe a natural disaster in their community is likely in the coming year, only 31% have a family emergency plan and 36% have a supply kit. Communication about these events remains primarily face-to-face or via phone, despite some use of social media.

The report finds that most Americans rarely discuss global warming, preferring face-to-face or phone communication over social media, especially after extreme weather events. It highlights that family and friends are the most influential in convincing individuals to take action. The 'Alarmed' segment is the most active in public and political communication, while the 'Dismissive' and 'Disengaged' are the least.

The report finds that most Americans rarely discuss global warming, with only 33% doing so occasionally or often with family and friends. Communication is predominantly private and face-to-face, particularly following extreme weather events, while public engagement via social media or government contact remains low. The 'Alarmed' segment of the population is the most active in public and political communication, whereas all segments identify close personal relationships as the most influential factor in convincing them to take action.

The document aggregates data from multiple polling organizations, indicating a general rise in American concern regarding climate change and a growing belief in its human causes. While there is broad support for renewable energy and power plant emission regulations, public support for carbon taxes and cap-and-trade measures remains low. The data highlights significant demographic variations, with higher levels of concern and support for government action among Democrats, minorities, and younger adults compared to Republicans.

The Index-Based Livestock Insurance (IBLI) Project in Mongolia, supported by the World Bank, provides financial security to herders facing mass livestock losses from extreme weather. Unlike traditional insurance, IBLI uses aggregated criteria for payouts, making it viable for sparsely populated areas. In 2012, 16,000 policies were purchased. The program is part of a broader government risk management strategy that includes adjusting livestock numbers to match pastureland carrying capacity.

The document examines Mongolia's Index-Based Livestock Insurance (IBLI) project, which provides financial security to herders facing 'dzuds' (extreme weather events). Unlike traditional insurance, IBLI triggers payouts based on aggregated mortality rates rather than individual losses, reducing transaction costs and moral hazard. The project, supported by the World Bank, integrates market-based insurance with government catastrophic coverage to protect against mass livestock losses. The brief emphasizes that for such programs to be sustainable, they require high-quality mortality data, affordable premiums, and integration into a broader risk management strategy that includes sustainable grazing practices and veterinary services.

Cartagena de Indias has developed the first adaptation guidelines for a coastal city in South America to manage risks from sea level rise, extreme weather, and flooding. These guidelines integrate scientific knowledge with the city's socioeconomic context, including its reliance on tourism and transportation. The process is being monitored by the Colombian government to inform the National Adaptation Plan and other coastal urban areas. The city views adaptation as a means to improve citizen life and avoid the long-term costs of inaction, though the process requires sustained capacity building for local stakeholders.

CCORAL (Caribbean Climate Online Risk and Adaptation TooL) is an open-access online system developed by the Caribbean Community Climate Change Centre (CCCCC) to help Caribbean government agencies, NGOs, and the private sector mainstream climate resilience into daily decision-making. The tool provides a screening exercise to prioritise climate-influenced activities, high-level guidance for both experts and non-experts, and a toolbox of over 70 climate risk management resources. It is specifically designed to fit into existing organisational processes such as national planning, budgeting, and legislation to avoid the high economic costs of climate inaction in the region.

The document details CDKN's efforts in India to enhance climate resilience through technical assistance, research, and policy support. Key initiatives include addressing 'silent disasters' in Ladakh, promoting gender-responsive state action plans, and using community radio for adaptation knowledge. It also analyzes the challenges facing State Action Plans for Climate Change (SAPCCs), noting that the automatic appointment of Forest Departments as nodal agencies often hinders the multi-sectoral coordination required for effective implementation.

A 2013 survey of Maryland residents reveals high levels of concern about climate change, with 86% believing it is happening and a majority supporting state-level sustainability policies. While residents prefer renewable energy sources like solar and wind, there is significant uncertainty regarding the state's actual energy mix. The report also highlights a gap between public support for climate action and individual behaviors, noting that home energy conservation is more common than transportation-related reductions.

A survey of Maryland residents in 2013 found that air pollution is viewed as the top personal health risk and that a majority of residents believe climate change is already harming people in the United States. The study highlights a strong public preference for renewable energy sources over fossil fuels and nuclear power due to health concerns. It also reveals that residents with multiple pre-existing medical conditions are more likely to perceive themselves as vulnerable to climate-related health impacts. Additionally, the report notes high public support for government prioritisation of protecting public water supplies and human health from environmental threats.

Friends of the Earth urges the public to support recovery efforts after Hurricane Sandy and encourages voters in the upcoming general election to prioritize candidates with strong records on climate change and clean energy, arguing that the storm was exacerbated by fossil-fuel-driven climate change.

The document serves as a thematic summary of the IPCC's SREX report, focusing on the science and implications of climate extremes for ecosystems. It is designed to assist policy makers and planners in understanding why extreme events are critical for ecosystems, how they are affected, and what actions can be taken to manage these risks to build a more resilient future.

The document introduces a thematic brief based on the IPCC's SREX report, which provides a scientific assessment of climate extremes and disasters. It aims to provide public health policy-makers and planners with guidance on why extreme events are critical public health issues, how they affect public health, and what actions can be taken to manage these risks to build a more resilient future.

The document serves as a thematic summary of the IPCC SREX report, focusing on the science and societal implications of climate extremes for the water sector. It is designed to assist policy-makers and planners in understanding why extreme events are critical for water management, how the sector is affected, and what actions can be taken to build resilience.

The document introduces a thematic brief based on the IPCC SREX report, which provides a scientific assessment of climate extremes and disasters. It aims to provide policy makers and planners with an understanding of why extreme events are critical for agricultural development, how the sector is affected, and what actions can be taken to manage these risks and build resilience.

The EESI advises the EPA against waiving the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) despite 2012 extreme weather, arguing that the RFS is not the cause of the economic harm to livestock and poultry producers. The document asserts that market forces and existing RFS flexibility are already reducing corn demand, and that a waiver would create policy uncertainty, deterring the estimated $168 billion in investment needed for advanced biorefineries by 2022. EESI maintains that the long-term benefits of the RFS—including reduced oil imports, lower greenhouse gas emissions, and rural economic growth—outweigh the potential short-term gains of a waiver.

A September 2012 survey indicates that 74% of Americans believe global warming is affecting U.S. weather, with a majority attributing the severity of recent extreme events—such as the 2012 summer heat and Midwest drought—to climate change. Public perception of worsening weather and local heat waves has increased since March 2012, particularly in the Midwest and Northeast, with 20% of respondents reporting health, property, or financial harm from heat waves in the past year.

The report finds that a growing majority of Americans (74%) believe global warming is affecting U.S. weather, with many attributing recent extreme heat, drought, and record temperatures to climate change. It details regional variations in perceptions, noting that Midwesterners were particularly sensitive to drought and crop harm in 2012, while Westerners reported higher rates of forest fires. The data shows an increase in the number of Americans reporting personal harm to health, property, or finances from extreme heat and drought.