Search Climate Insights Directory

The document is a comprehensive guide for small-scale fishing communities in South Africa to exercise their environmental rights. It details the legal framework—including the Constitution and the National Environmental Management Act (NEMA)—and explains how communities can engage in Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) and legislative processes. It specifically warns against the risks of offshore oil and gas exploration, mining, and the impacts of climate change, using case studies like the Deepwater Horizon spill and the 2022 Durban floods to illustrate environmental and socio-economic vulnerabilities. The guide provides practical steps for accessing information via the Promotion of Access to Information Act (PAIA) and highlights successful legal challenges against companies like Shell and Searcher to demonstrate the power of collective community action.

The document provides a comprehensive framework for small-scale fishing communities in South Africa to exercise their environmental rights against industrial developments. It details the legal landscape, including the Constitution and the National Environmental Management Act (NEMA), and explains the processes for Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) and public participation. The guide highlights the risks associated with oil and gas exploration, mining, and power ships, while emphasizing the impacts of climate change on coastal livelihoods. It concludes with practical steps for legal challenges and accessing information via PAIA requests, illustrated by case studies involving Shell and Searcher.

The document provides a comprehensive guide for small-scale fishers in South Africa to exercise their environmental rights. It details the legal protections offered by the Constitution and acts like NEMA and MPRDA, explains the risks associated with oil and gas exploration, mining, and energy projects, and provides practical steps for engaging in Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) and legislative processes to ensure community voices are heard in ocean governance.

The research identifies that while health and environmental benefits motivate the transition to electric school buses, districts are hindered by concerns over cost, infrastructure, and technology. Notably, geography and locale influence district needs more than priority status, and most districts do not currently integrate equity considerations into their electrification processes.

A letter from CAPE Nova Scotia physicians warning the provincial government that repealing bans on fracking and uranium mining would cause severe health harms, including increased cancer and birth defect rates, and contradict the province's climate goals.

The document details the Trump administration's systematic dismantling of U.S. climate and environmental justice policies, highlighting the rescission of the Justice 40 initiative and the freezing of funds from the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. It reports on the administrative leave of 168 EPA employees dedicated to underserved communities and the suspension of Community Benefit Plans by the Department of Energy. The guide provides resources for journalists to track the impact of these cuts on specific programs like Solar for All and the efforts of activists and legal experts to resist these changes.

The document details the Trump administration's efforts to gut US climate policy, focusing on the rescission of the Justice 40 initiative and the freezing of related federal funds. It reports on the administrative leave of EPA employees, the suspension of Community Benefit Plans at the Department of Energy, and the removal of the Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool, while highlighting the intended goals of the original environmental justice programs.

Earthjustice condemns the closure of the EPA's Office of Environmental Justice and External Civil Rights (OEJECR), which has resulted in 168 civil servants being placed on administrative leave. The organization argues that removing this office, which identifies discriminatory environmental conditions and protects vulnerable communities, will lead to increased health crises—including higher cancer and asthma death rates—and reduced economic opportunities for the most affected populations.

The report evaluates the health integration of NDCs from several countries, finding that while many recognize the health benefits of climate mitigation, most lack measurable health targets, dedicated funding for health adaptation, and alignment with 1.5°C pathways. It provides specific analyses for countries including Brazil, the UK, and the UAE, and offers recommendations for 'Healthy NDCs 3.0' that prioritize health as a central pillar of climate action.

The document outlines four core principles for the EPA to implement cumulative impact assessments: decreasing disproportionate burdens through distributive and restorative justice, expanding beyond traditional risk assessments to include social determinants of health, accounting for historical burdens, and adopting a precautionary approach that shifts the burden of proof to regulated actors.

The document argues that the EPA's definition of cumulative impacts must be actionable, culturally competent, and explicitly inclusive of social determinants of health. It recommends that the EPA workshop and improve the Office of Research and Development's current definition through engagement with frontline communities to ensure it reflects lived experiences and supports health equity.

The document outlines short-term and long-term strategies for the EPA to better address cumulative impacts, including expanding hyper-local pollution monitoring, enhancing polluter transparency via real-time apps, and integrating existing health data into cleanup thresholds and risk assessments.

The document outlines a framework for cumulative impact assessments (CIAs) that integrates equity, justice, and public health practices. It argues that the EPA and other government entities should use transparent principles to ensure assessments inform regulatory decisions, such as permit denials or pollution cleanup, while incorporating diverse stressors and community-led trust building.

The document advocates for the integration of lived experience, experiential knowledge, and community knowledge into environmental regulatory systems to better understand cumulative impacts in overburdened communities. It defines these terms to ensure consistent regulatory use and argues that such knowledge is an essential complement to professional scientific data, which often has blind spots. The text recommends that the EPA institutionalize training for employees in active listening and implicit bias, and adopt mixed-methods approaches to integrate qualitative community data with quantitative analysis.

The document advocates for the EPA to adopt management-zone strategies and community-driven approaches to address cumulative environmental burdens. It emphasizes integrating regulatory tools with pollution reduction, ensuring accountability through Community Benefits Agreements, and preventing resident displacement. The summary highlights the need for interagency coordination and meaningful community leadership in the design and execution of environmental health protections.

The document argues that environmental pollution disproportionately affects low-income communities and communities of color due to systemic drivers like racism and colonialism. It recommends that the EPA move beyond 'race-neutral' assessments by using direct indices of social adversity—such as segregation and material hardship—rather than simple proxies. Additionally, it calls for the application of an antiracist lens in government science, the recruitment of staff from overburdened communities, and the removal of barriers to laws that repair past environmental injustices.

The document outlines recommendations for the EPA to integrate climate justice into environmental protections. It emphasizes the need for transparent, holistic decision-making, the acknowledgment of historic biased policies, and the strengthening of the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) to better account for cumulative stressors and the specific needs of marginalized communities and non-mainland US territories.

The document highlights that while medium- and heavy-duty vehicles (MHDVs) make up only about 10% of US on-road vehicles, they contribute over half of fine particulate matter and nitrogen oxide emissions. It reports an exponential increase in zero-emission MHDV registrations from under 1,000 in 2019 to over 27,000 in 2023. The analysis finds that over 85% of MHDVs travel fewer than 100 miles daily, making them suitable for current battery-electric technology. While operational costs for electric trucks are lower, up-front costs remain a barrier for larger models, necessitating continued state and federal policy support and the expansion of charging infrastructure along freight corridors.

Ean Thomas Tafoya has transitioned from Colorado State Director to Vice President of State Programs at GreenLatinos. The organization aims to counter federal environmental policy rollbacks by amplifying state-based solutions and supporting member leaders across five states to protect Latino communities from pollution and systemic inequities.

The research evaluates the Reindeer Husbandry Plan (Renbruksplan) as a tool for managing conflicts between industrial forestry and Indigenous Sámi reindeer herding in Sweden. The analysis finds that the tool fails to improve procedural justice and instead privileges forestry-centered perspectives, potentially perpetuating existing injustices in forest governance without broader institutional reform.