Search Climate Insights Directory

The Green Offices Toolkit offers a comprehensive framework for Canadian health care providers to implement sustainable office practices. It outlines a phased approach to 'greening' a clinic, starting with the establishment of a 'Green Team' and the definition of a vision and mission. The document provides specific technical advice on reducing energy and water consumption, managing toxic substances like mercury and pharmaceuticals, and minimizing waste through recycling and composting. It also emphasizes the role of physicians as community leaders who can influence patient health and environmental behavior through education and by modeling sustainable lifestyles.

The Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment and other health organizations call for a green and just economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. They advocate for investments in renewable energy, sustainable transportation, and nature protection to meet Paris Agreement targets, arguing that such actions would save over 112,000 lives by 2050 and increase clean jobs to 1.5 million. The letter emphasizes the need for a recovery that addresses the disproportionate impacts of climate change and systemic racism on Indigenous Peoples.

The Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment (CAPE) recommends amending Bill C-12 to include a 2025 emissions target, establish a truly independent scientific advisory body reporting to Parliament, and ensure explicit alignment with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). CAPE frames climate change as a critical health threat, noting that Canada is the only G7 country whose emissions have risen since the 2016 Paris Agreement.

The Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment argues that pollution pricing is essential for reducing emissions and protecting public health in Canada. The statement highlights that the industrial carbon pricing system is projected to be the largest driver of emissions reductions from 2025 to 2030, while the consumer fuel charge accounts for up to 14% of reductions. It asserts that carbon pricing has a 'negligible' impact on inflation and that 80% of households receive more in rebates than they pay. The authors link fossil fuel combustion to 1 in 7 premature deaths in Canada and warn that heat-related deaths could cost between $5.2 and $8.5 billion annually by the end of the century. The document calls on political leaders to uphold pollution pricing to maintain economic competitiveness and align with international trade mechanisms like Carbon Border Adjustments.

The methodology note describes how the Clean Air Task Force (CATF) models unit-level emissions and resulting health impacts for coal plants slated for retirement between 2025 and 2028. It details the data sources used, the cumulative nature of the map results, and the user-adjustable emission levels provided in the tool.

The document warns that a 1.5°C global temperature increase will result in a 2°C rise for Namibia, potentially within the next decade. This warming is expected to cause decreased annual rainfall, more frequent heat waves, and a loss of approximately 30% of species. Health risks include increased vulnerability to heat stroke and potential disease outbreaks in new areas, although malaria may decrease due to drier conditions. To adapt, the document recommends diversifying farming, implementing rangeland management, and practicing soil and water conservation.

The document provides a scientific and legal basis for the European Court of Human Rights to assess State due diligence regarding climate change. It emphasizes the urgency of limiting warming to 1.5°C to avoid irreversible damage and tipping points, noting that current global emissions trends are insufficient. It highlights severe health risks in Europe, including heat-related mortality, and argues that under the Paris Agreement and the UNFCCC, States have a 'best efforts' obligation to pursue the highest possible ambition in emissions reductions. ClientEarth asserts that failure to meet international climate commitments constitutes a prima facie violation of human rights obligations, and that adaptation measures cannot substitute for necessary mitigation.

The Healthy NDC Scorecard evaluates national climate commitments (NDCs) based on climate ambition, health impacts, and governance. It categorizes outcomes ranging from 'Paris Agreement compliant' and 'Science aligned' to those that are 'Catastrophic for human health', specifically tracking temperature trajectories from 1.5°C to over 4°C.

The document outlines the severe health vulnerabilities of the Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) region due to climate change, emphasizing the disproportionate impact on marginalized groups. It calls for a transition to sustainable food and energy systems, the strengthening of primary healthcare, and the implementation of climate justice to protect the right to health.

The Common Position of Latin America and the Caribbean on Climate Change and Health identifies the region's high vulnerability to extreme weather and climate-sensitive diseases, exacerbated by structural inequalities. It argues for the integration of health into national climate policies (NDCs and NAPs), the strengthening of primary care, and the application of climate justice for marginalized communities. The document highlights significant gaps in health sector adaptation planning and a lack of health-specific indicators in climate finance, specifically noting that only 11.6% of Green Climate Fund projects in the region include explicit health benefits. It calls for a fair transition to a fossil-fuel-free economy and increased international support for regional health capacities.

The document argues that climate change severely impacts the physical and mental health of populations in Latin America and the Caribbean, exacerbating existing socioeconomic and structural inequalities. It identifies critical gaps in health system resilience, a lack of climate-health integration in professional education, and insufficient financing, noting that only 11.6% of Green Climate Fund projects in the region explicitly include health benefits. To address these, the Common Position advocates for the full application of climate justice principles, the strengthening of primary healthcare, and the inclusion of health indicators in the Global Adaptation Goal at COP30 and the Belém Health Action Plan.

The project identifies that older adults in the City of Buenos Aires are disproportionately vulnerable to extreme heat, particularly in vulnerable neighborhoods where infrastructure limitations and power outages reduce coping capacity. Through 634 surveys, focus groups, and geospatial mapping of heat and population density, the project developed an early response pilot plan with differentiated measures for formal and vulnerable urban areas. Key findings highlight a gap between knowledge and practice regarding preventive measures and the critical role of community networks in coping with heat.

The document provides technical instructions for using the IBC tab in LEAP settings to manage health impact calculations and particulate matter scaling. It details how to create Key Assumption Branches to switch between different versions of the Global Burden of Disease relative risk functions (2010, 2015, 2019), two different PM scaling methods (including one based on van Donkelaar, 2016), and IIASA ECLIPSE background emission scenarios (versions 5 or 6).

The document provides a detailed technical walkthrough of the Settings menu in LEAP, covering the Scope & Scale, Years, Calculations, Costs, Optimization, IBC, Internet, Mapping, Folders, and Scripts tabs. It explains how users can enable specific analysis modules—such as energy demand, transformation, and environmental effects—and configure critical parameters like base years, discount rates, and optimization solvers. The guide also details the integration of the Impact Benefit Calculator (IBC) for health and climate impact modeling and the use of GIS shape files for geographical mapping of results.