Search Climate Insights Directory

The analysis reveals that current ecosystem services indicators generally have a low capacity to convey useful information to policy-makers, with significant gaps in data and comprehensiveness. These limitations are most pronounced for regulating and cultural services compared to provisioning services.

The document details the methodology for mapping global forest restoration opportunities by comparing current forest coverage with potential forest coverage under current climate conditions. It defines four forest conditions—intact, fragmented/managed, degraded, and deforested—and categorizes restoration opportunities based on human pressure and population density. The analysis identifies over two billion hectares of potential restoration area, with mosaic restoration being the most significant opportunity. The methodology also supports the Bonn Challenge, which aims to restore 150 million hectares of land worldwide by 2020.

The document outlines a three-phase framework (scoping, analysis, and outreach) for valuing coastal ecosystems in the Caribbean to ensure such studies translate into real-world policy influence. It identifies key enabling conditions for success, such as clear policy questions and strong stakeholder engagement, and addresses gaps in existing valuation tools by providing specific reporting guidelines and best-practice examples for the region.

The forest products industry faces a transition driven by environmental policies and shifting consumer values, offering a unique opportunity to provide sustainable solutions to climate change, including carbon storage. However, the industry remains fragmented regarding appropriate climate policies, and the realization of these market opportunities depends on the establishment of clear, long-term national and international regulatory frameworks.

The World Resources Institute's guidebook introduces the ARK and SPARK frameworks to help businesses move from nature-related commitments to tangible action. Based on input from 41 corporate actors, the guide outlines a five-step process for identifying nature-related risks and opportunities, prioritizing actions, securing internal support, refining operational mechanisms, and evaluating outcomes. It also identifies key internal enablers, such as leadership commitment and governance structures, and external drivers, including regulatory pressure and investor demand, while addressing barriers like financing constraints and the difficulty of articulating a clear business case for nature investments.

The Carbon Canopy is a partnership of companies, landowners, and NGOs designed to increase the area of sustainably managed forests in the southern U.S. by using carbon offset revenue to compensate woodland owners for certification costs. Based on the partnership's experience, the document recommends that similar programs actively recruit and secure anchor buyers to build demand, invest in landowner education and upfront financing to ensure supply, and select high-quality certification standards early to create efficient transactional infrastructure.

The Corporate Ecosystem Services Review (ESR) is a strategic tool developed by the World Resources Institute, the Meridian Institute, and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development. It provides a five-step methodology for companies to assess how ecosystem degradation—which has seen 15 of 24 evaluated services decline over the last 50 years—affects their bottom line. The ESR identifies five categories of risks and opportunities: operational, regulatory and legal, reputational, market and product, and financing. By 2012, approximately 300 companies had utilized the ESR to move beyond traditional pollution-focused environmental assessments toward a strategy that accounts for ecosystem dependence.

The paper introduces the Triple Dividend of Resilience (TDR) framework, which categorizes adaptation benefits into avoided losses (first dividend), induced economic/development benefits (second dividend), and social/environmental benefits (third dividend). It finds that the second and third dividends often exceed the value of avoided losses and can result in benefit-cost ratios greater than 1 independently of whether a disaster occurs. The author argues that fully quantifying these dividends can help mobilize public and private finance and suggests five strategies to standardize TDR analysis, including growing the evidence base and improving data collection.

The report argues that Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs) must move beyond a narrow focus on market-valued provisioning services to a systematic approach that accounts for multiple ecosystem services in all development operations. It highlights that two-thirds of 24 audited global ecosystem services have been degraded, undermining development. The document proposes integrating ecosystem services into strategic direction setting, advisory services, and investments to better manage risks and opportunities related to climate and environment.

The document argues that conventional landscaping practices in the United States fail to leverage the full range of ecosystem services provided by managed landscapes, such as residential lawns and golf courses. It proposes a conceptual framework to quantify and value seven specific ecosystem services—including carbon sequestration and water retention—to guide design and management decisions.

The document proposes a 'working forest' model for the southern United States, where public entities acquire land or development rights to generate revenue from sustainable timber, recreation, and ecosystem services. This approach is presented as a more cost-effective alternative to traditional conservation programs, with potential for local management via citizen advisory boards and financing through public bonds or taxes.

The document identifies the ecosystem services provided by southern US forests and the drivers threatening them, while introducing five categories of measures—land use instruments, fiscal incentives, liability limitations, market incentives, and education/capacity building—to promote forest conservation.

The report evaluates the economic contributions of Jamaica's coral reefs, highlighting their critical role in maintaining beaches for tourism, supporting reef-associated fisheries, and reducing coastal flooding. It warns that further reef degradation will lead to increased beach erosion, reduced tourism revenue, and higher vulnerability to storm-induced inundation, while noting that overfishing has already caused significant historical revenue losses.

The report finds that the majority of the world's coral reefs are threatened by human activities and climate change, with projections that nearly all reefs will be threatened by 2050 if current trends continue. While 27% of reefs are in marine protected areas, only 6% are in effectively managed areas. The document emphasizes that reducing local pressures like overfishing and pollution is critical to increasing reef resilience against warming seas and ocean acidification.

The document highlights India's commitment to restore 26 million hectares of land by 2030 to sequester carbon and support livelihoods. Using the Sidhi District in Madhya Pradesh as a case study, it demonstrates that restoring nearly 75% of the district's land could sequester over 7 million metric tons of carbon and generate significant short-term income and long-term employment for marginalized groups through nature-based solutions.

The document identifies over two billion hectares of global land suitable for restoration, primarily in tropical and temperate regions. It categorizes these opportunities into wide-scale, mosaic, and remote restoration, emphasizing that restoration is a complementary strategy to avoiding deforestation for sequestering carbon and improving ecosystem services.

WRI management acknowledges the 2012 external review's finding that the institute made important progress on its 2008-2012 Strategic Plan, particularly in establishing in-country presences in China, India, and Brazil. The response outlines achievements in communications, cross-program synergies, and staff diversity, while addressing the need for better integration and visibility for its forest work. Looking forward, WRI aims to balance its role as a 'think tank' and 'do tank,' strengthen its presence in Africa, and more consistently integrate development and poverty concerns into its environmental work.

The document analyzes the restoration of approximately 4 million hectares of forest in New England between 1880 and 2000, which occurred largely through the passive abandonment of agricultural land. It identifies market shifts toward Midwestern agriculture and the subsequent decline of small-scale regional farming as primary drivers. While ecological conditions and policy measures like the Weeks Act of 1911 supported this recovery, the report warns that current trends are reversing due to residential development, population growth, and ecological pressures such as deer browsing.

South Korea successfully increased its forest cover from approximately 3.5 million hectares in the mid-1950s to 6.4 million hectares by 2007, primarily through active restoration. This recovery was driven by strong government leadership, national awareness campaigns, and a series of multi-year Forest Development Plans. While the restoration provided significant ecosystem services valued at over US$92 billion as of 2013, the study notes caveats including a historical reliance on authoritarian labor practices, low species diversity due to a focus on coniferous trees, and a high dependence on imported wood, including illegally sourced timber.

The report provides an economic analysis of securing indigenous land rights in the Amazon basin of Bolivia, Brazil, and Colombia. Using matching analysis, it finds that tenure-secure indigenous forestlands have significantly lower deforestation rates than similar non-secure lands. A benefit-cost analysis indicates that the investment is low-cost and high-benefit, with total ecosystem service benefits estimated between $679 and $1,530 billion over 20 years, while costs represent less than 1 percent of these benefits. The report argues that securing indigenous tenure is a more cost-effective carbon mitigation measure than fossil carbon capture and storage. It recommends that governments reform laws to strengthen community land rights and integrate tenure security into their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs).