Search Climate Insights Directory

The document opposes the February 2026 repeal of the EPA's 2009 Endangerment Finding, which established that greenhouse gas pollution endangers human health and welfare. It argues that the repeal disproportionately harms low-income communities and communities of color, while creating regulatory uncertainty for the heavy-duty trucking industry and potentially costing Americans $180 billion over the next decade.

GreenLatinos advocates for a just transition away from fossil fuels that integrates the needs of Latino communities in the U.S. and Latin America. The organization emphasizes that U.S. demand for oil and gas drives extraction and instability in Latin America, while U.S.-based Latino neighborhoods suffer from the proximity of refineries and industrial facilities. Through its Latino Climate Justice Framework, GreenLatinos seeks to build cross-border solidarity, apply international resistance strategies to U.S. energy justice fights, and ensure frontline Latino leadership in global climate solutions.

GreenLatinos advocates for a just transition from fossil fuels that prioritizes the leadership of frontline Latino communities in the US and Latin America. The organization emphasizes that the climate crisis and fossil fuel infrastructure create a linked system of pollution in US neighborhoods and extractive damage in Latin America. Through its Latino Climate Justice Framework (LCJF), GreenLatinos seeks to build international solidarity, integrate global movement strategies into domestic fights for clean air and energy justice, and ensure that the transition includes genuine community decision-making and worker protections.

The document argues that mangrove restoration requires more than planting seedlings, necessitating rigorous scientific planning, inclusive community engagement, and strong governance. It warns that poorly planned efforts can disrupt hydrological regimes, increase erosion, and exacerbate gender inequalities or tenure conflicts. Drawing on Convention on Biological Diversity guidelines, the brief recommends conducting long-term environmental monitoring, using native climate-resilient species, engaging Indigenous Knowledge holders, and upholding free, prior, and informed consent.

The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) advocates for a managed, financed, and equitable fossil fuel phaseout during the First Conference on Transitioning Away from Fossil Fuels in Santa Marta, Colombia. CIEL proposes a binding Fossil Fuel Treaty to fill governance gaps and argues that states have a legal obligation, supported by the International Court of Justice (ICJ), to phase out fossil fuels. Key priorities include dismantling Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) mechanisms, ending offshore oil and gas licensing, halting petrochemical expansion, and rejecting carbon capture and geoengineering. The document emphasizes that the transition must be funded by the largest cumulative polluters and grounded in human rights and Indigenous leadership.

The document examines the impact of geothermal energy expansion in Indonesia, specifically projects funded by the World Bank and Asian Development Bank. It details environmental degradation, including water depletion and pollution, and social harms such as health crises, economic losses for farmers, and the criminalization of dissent. The author advocates for a 'Feminist Just Transition' framework to ensure community consent and equity in the energy transition.

The Climate Litigation Lab report summarizes discussions from a 2025 event in Magaliesburg, South Africa, focusing on Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation (SLAPPs) and the legal challenges facing environmental defenders in Africa.

The report critiques South Africa's National Climate Change Adaptation Strategy (NCCAS) 2020 and its 2025 Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) for failing to address the root causes of current vulnerability, such as poverty and inequality. It argues that focusing solely on system resilience—such as 'climate smart agriculture'—without reducing existing vulnerabilities like food insecurity leads to 'maladaptation' and risks a 'downward spiral of undevelopment.' The author proposes shifting from 'incremental adaptation' (technical adjustments) to 'transformative adaptation' (system transitions), incorporating a distributive justice framework similar to that used in energy transitions to ensure that the structural causes of vulnerability are dismantled.

The report examines the expansion of geothermal energy in Indonesia, highlighting the role of the World Bank and Asian Development Bank in funding projects that mitigate corporate risk while shifting social and environmental burdens to local communities. It documents specific instances of water depletion, pollution, and human rights abuses, arguing for a 'Feminist Just Transition' to ensure climate justice.

The report examines the impact of geothermal energy development in Indonesia, highlighting a contradiction between its role as a climate solution and the resulting socio-environmental risks. It details how funding from the World Bank and Asian Development Bank (ADB) has accelerated projects that lead to water depletion, pollution, and the displacement of local livelihoods. The document documents specific cases of environmental degradation, such as mudflows and gas leaks, as well as the criminalization of dissent and the marginalization of women and Indigenous peoples. It concludes that the current financial model transfers risk to local communities and calls for a transition based on equity, justice, and the explicit consent of affected populations.

The report examines the Asian Development Bank's (ADB) 95 million USD equity investment in Clifford Capital, a Singapore-based financial intermediary. It argues that ADB's use of financial intermediaries (FIs) creates a transparency gap that allows continued support for fossil gas projects, contradicting the bank's stated goals of Paris Agreement alignment. The document highlights specific projects in Indonesia and Bangladesh as examples of environmental and social harm resulting from such investments and calls for a phased exit from fossil gas funding.

The statement argues that the Alberta government's $46 million investment in tailings remediation is inadequate given the 1.7 trillion litres of tailings and billions in toxic liabilities. The signatories claim the funding is used to justify industry expansion and express concern that treated tailings may be released into watersheds, potentially harming downstream Indigenous communities. They further highlight discrepancies in water use data and reports of significant underreporting of toxic pollution from dried tailings.

The statement asserts that gender inequality is reinforced by patriarchy, colonialism, and corporate power, which exacerbate the impacts of environmental destruction on women. It calls for global action to protect environmental defenders, end militarization, and invest in universal care systems to achieve a just transition and systemic change.

The statement asserts that gender injustice is deeply linked to environmental destruction and systemic oppression rooted in patriarchy, colonialism, and corporate power. It highlights that women and gender-diverse people are disproportionately affected by ecosystem collapse and militarisation but are also leading resistance efforts. The document calls for governments to protect environmental defenders, end militarisation, and invest in universal care services.

The statement asserts that gender inequality is deeply linked to environmental destruction and systemic exploitation. It highlights how women and gender-marginalized people are disproportionately affected by ecological collapse and militarization while leading resistance efforts. The text calls for international action to protect environmental defenders, end militarization, and ensure equitable access to land and resources.

The document outlines the climate and social risks associated with the expansion of data centers, highlighting their massive energy and water consumption. It warns journalists against uncritically accepting corporate claims about job creation and investment, urging them to investigate local resource competition, 'digital sacrifice zones,' and extractivist dynamics in the Global South.

The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) asserts that US and Israeli military strikes on Iran are illegal acts of aggression that destabilize the region and cause destruction to both human life and the environment. CIEL argues that these attacks cannot be justified as efforts to promote human rights or democracy, noting that such military actions have already resulted in hundreds of civilian deaths. The organization calls on the international community, including European leaders, to reject the normalization of force and instead prioritize diplomacy, multilateralism, and nuclear restraint to protect the environment and the rule of law.

The document advocates for a legally binding international treaty to end corporate impunity for environmental and human rights abuses, highlighting the insufficiency of voluntary frameworks and the potential of the UN's Open-Ended Intergovernmental Working Group (OEIGWG) process to establish enforceable obligations, extraterritorial jurisdiction, and effective remedies for affected communities.

The report examines the governance of copper and lithium in Chile, highlighting a significant gap between international sustainability principles and territorial realities. Through case studies in Tarapacá and Antofagasta, it identifies critical failures in indigenous participation, water management, and the equitable distribution of mining royalties. While the 2023 National Lithium Strategy is noted as a step toward state control and sustainability, the document argues that a just transition requires binding community participation, transparent fiscal management, and regional economic diversification to avoid reproducing historical extractivist inequalities.

The report details a three-day workshop involving civil society, labour, and producers to analyze the intersection of climate change and South Africa's food system. It critiques mainstream 'climate-smart' technical fixes, advocating instead for transformative alternatives like agroecology, land reform, and seed sovereignty. The document provides a framework for engaging with the Climate Change Act 22 of 2024, specifically through the National Adaptation Strategy and Plan (NASP) and Sector Adaptation Plans, to ensure that climate policy addresses structural inequalities and supports marginalized food system actors.