Search Climate Insights Directory

The document presents reflections from a panel discussion regarding the ethical implications of oil sponsorship in Norway. It criticizes the Festspillene i Bergen and the Norwegian Ski Federation for maintaining long-term partnerships with companies like Equinor, Aker BP, and Vår Energi, arguing that such ties limit freedom of expression, target children and youth for marketing, and contradict climate goals.

The report evaluates the Paris 2024 climate strategy, noting that while efforts in construction and food supply are robust, other sectors like transport and energy lack transparency and detailed methodology. It criticizes the evolution of public claims from 'carbon neutrality' to 'climate positive' as misleading and highlights a lack of transparency in carbon credit purchases. The authors argue that future games must downscale or decentralize to align with the 1.5°C goal and should avoid partnering with companies whose climate pathways are incompatible with the Paris Agreement.

The report analyzes the Paris 2024 climate strategy, noting that while efforts in construction and food procurement are robust, there is significant opacity regarding carbon credit purchases, energy sourcing, and the overall carbon budget. It criticizes the evolution of public communication from 'carbon neutrality' to 'climate positive' as misleading and highlights the incompatibility of many official sponsors with the Paris Agreement. The document argues that incremental improvements are insufficient and proposes a radical redesign of the Olympic model, such as distributing events globally to reduce international air travel and infrastructure needs.

The communication strategy for Côte d'Ivoire's National Adaptation Plan (2023–2030) aims to build a climate-resilient society by informing and sensitizing diverse stakeholders. It identifies four strategic axes: political appropriation, public awareness of adaptation practices, documentation of lessons learned, and coordination. The strategy targets institutional actors, community leaders, civil society, the private sector, and the media, utilizing a mix of institutional, behavioral change, and digital communication. Implementation is estimated to cost approximately 50 billion CFA francs.

The report analyzes data from 6,190 U.S. adults (2021-2023) to examine the 'attitude-behavior gap' in political climate action. It finds that while many Americans express willingness to sign petitions, donate, volunteer, or contact officials, actual engagement rates are significantly lower. The study identifies that 'Definitely willing and active' individuals are more likely to discuss climate change, perceive supportive social norms, and hold stronger collective efficacy beliefs. To bridge this gap, the authors recommend direct requests for involvement, simplifying the process of taking action, and amplifying pro-climate social norms.

The report identifies a significant 'attitude-behavior gap' in U.S. political climate action, where many adults express willingness to act but few do so. It highlights that those who are both willing and active possess stronger collective efficacy beliefs, more frequent communication about climate change, and a higher perception of supportive social norms. To bridge this gap, the authors recommend direct interpersonal requests, simplifying the process of engagement, and amplifying diverse pro-climate social norms.

The report finds that while only 5% of event-related local television segments provided climate change context, these segments reached over 17 million people across the 50 largest U.S. media markets. Audiences surged during extreme events, with local television viewership doubling in Orlando during Hurricane Ian and increasing 78% in Los Angeles during Tropical Storm Hilary. Extreme heat events, specifically the July 2023 heat streak in Phoenix, were most frequently linked to climate change, accounting for 48% of all climate-contextualized segments. Analysis of closed captioning shows that 96% of contextualized segments highlighted major impacts in categories such as health and safety, vulnerable communities, power supply, the economy, and travel disruption.

The project tested communication strategies to encourage diet change among a specific demographic in Moston, Manchester. Findings indicate that health benefits, cost savings, and community-led messaging are more effective than climate-focused arguments. The study emphasizes avoiding 'marketing' terms like 'plant-based' and instead focusing on simple swaps and authentic, peer-to-peer sharing within the community.

The text examines the disconnect between the general public's concern for climate change and the perceived alienating nature of high-profile environmental protests in the UK. It advocates for a shift in narrative, moving away from a focus on disruption toward highlighting everyday progress, such as the adoption of solar panels, wind turbines, and heat pumps, to foster a sense of hope and collective agency.

Liberia's NAP Communication Strategy provides a roadmap for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to disseminate climate adaptation priorities. It identifies priority audiences—including political leadership, local communities, and the private sector—and proposes tailored messaging for six key sectors: agriculture, coastal zones, energy, fisheries, forestry, and waste management. The strategy emphasizes a multi-channel approach, prioritizing radio as the primary information source for both rural and urban populations, and includes a detailed implementation plan for 2024–2025 with a budget for activities such as community radio contracts and media training.

The author contends that despite 2024 being a record-breaking election year and the hottest year on record, news outlets are sidelining the climate crisis in political reporting. This is particularly evident in the US, where climate issues are often treated as afterthoughts or framed as unsettled science. To address this, Covering Climate Now is launching 'The Climate Elections project,' which includes a newsletter and resources to help reporters integrate climate issues into campaign coverage, moving away from 'horserace' reporting toward substantive policy questions.

Rachael Orr, CEO of Climate Outreach, reflects on her first year with the organisation and outlines strategic priorities for the coming decade, focusing on research dissemination, political inclusivity, and sector diversity.

The document details how Yale Climate Connections (YCC) utilizes personal narratives, evidence-based 'climate framing', and diverse voices to bridge the psychological distance of climate change. It emphasizes the use of the 'Six Americas' segmentation to tailor content, the importance of centering hope through problem-solution narratives, and the strategic use of succinct 90-second radio stories to reach a broad national audience, including conservatives and opinion leaders.

The briefing analyzes U.S. public opinion on climate justice using the 'Six Americas' framework. It finds that while awareness of the term 'climate justice' is low (34%), support for its goals increases significantly after the concept is explained, particularly among the 'Alarmed' and 'Concerned' segments. These groups are most likely to recognize that global warming disproportionately harms lower-income people and people of color, and are more likely to vote for candidates supporting climate justice. Conversely, the 'Doubtful' and 'Dismissive' segments show minimal recognition of climate injustice and low support for its goals.

Clean Creatives claims the Edelman Trust Barometer is compromised by the firm's ties to climate deniers and autocratic states, alleging that the data overstates trust in governments that are Edelman clients and contradicts the firm's public climate commitments.

The report analyzes survey data from April 2023 to determine how different segments of the U.S. population perceive the unequal impacts of climate change. It finds that while awareness of the term 'climate justice' is low (34%), support for its goals increases to 53% once those goals are explained. Support is strongest among the 'Alarmed' and 'Concerned' segments, who are also most likely to recognize that climate change disproportionately harms lower-income people and people of color, though few respondents across all groups recognize a disproportionate harm to women.

A survey of 1,033 American adults in October 2023 shows that 72% believe global warming is happening, with 58% attributing it primarily to human causes. While 65% of respondents express worry about global warming and many identify specific local risks like power outages and extreme heat, a majority (65%) rarely or never discuss the topic with family and friends. Approximately 10% of respondents report symptoms of anxiety or depression linked to global warming. Despite these concerns, 60% of Americans disagree that it is too late to act, and 63% feel a personal responsibility to help reduce global warming.

The report finds that while 39% of Americans believe global warming is harming the health of the general population, only 16% feel it harms their own health. There is an increasing awareness of specific health risks, particularly heat stroke, air pollution, and respiratory issues, and a growing recognition that low-income people and people of color are disproportionately affected. Trust in information sources like primary care physicians and climate scientists has risen, while coal and nuclear energy are viewed as the most harmful energy sources to health.

A 2024 survey of 1,013 American adults reveals an increase in the perception that global warming harms public health, with specific concerns rising for heat stroke, air pollution, and respiratory diseases. While 39% believe global warming harms the health of Americans, only 16% feel it harms their own health. Public awareness of disproportionate impacts on low-income people and people of color has grown since 2014. Regarding energy, coal and nuclear power are viewed as the most harmful to health, while trust in first responders and primary care physicians as information sources is high.

The report outlines the activities of the Climate Story Lab Nordic 2023/2024, which supported nine climate films to develop impact strategies and narratives. It argues that storytelling is a critical infrastructure for the energy transition, capable of moving beyond scientific facts to address the emotional and existential dimensions of the climate crisis. The document provides a handbook of essays from scientists, filmmakers, and practitioners, emphasizing the need to reach the 'moveable middle' of the population and the importance of centering climate justice and local contexts in narratives. It concludes by calling for a more robust 'storytelling ecosystem' that supports independent filmmakers and challenges the influence of fossil fuel industry narratives.