Search Climate Insights Directory

The policy brief argues that for the Caribbean Community (CARICOM), a Just Transition must be a multi-sectoral regional transformation strategy rather than a narrow focus on fossil fuel phase-out. It introduces a framework based on six guiding principles—social justice, effective governance, inclusive participation, economic resilience, alignment with climate goals, and green financing—to mitigate risks in sectors like energy, tourism, and transport, while leveraging growth opportunities in the blue and orange economies. The author recommends institutionalizing social dialogue, strengthening regional policy coherence, and mobilizing scaled concessional finance to ensure the transition is equitable and supports long-term economic diversification.

The report examines how the green transition is reshaping trade, investment, and geopolitics for Africa. It analyzes the impact of the EU and UK Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanisms (CBAM), the decarbonisation of maritime and aviation sectors, and the potential for Africa to move from raw mineral extraction to EV battery production. It warns that without strategic policy intervention, clean energy exports and critical mineral demand may reproduce extractive economic patterns, while advocating for a unified continental approach to negotiate fairer terms in international climate-trade frameworks.

Kenya is a regional leader in renewable energy and climate action, but it lacks a formal, dedicated National Just Transition Framework. While elements of social equity and inclusion are embedded in the Constitution, the Climate Change Act (2016), and the second NDC (2031–2035), the transition is hindered by institutional fragmentation, a skills mismatch in the workforce, and inadequate data systems. The document highlights the energy sector as the cornerstone for decarbonisation, aiming for 100% renewable energy by 2035, and identifies agriculture, forestry, land use (AFOLU), transport, and waste management as other priority sectors. Key barriers include the financial vulnerability of those in the AFOLU sector due to carbon market fluctuations and a debt cycle where climate-resilient infrastructure diverts funds from worker retraining. The brief recommends that international actors provide technical capacity for policy integration, support the development of monitoring systems, and restructure global green value chains to ensure greater value-added benefits for producing countries like Kenya.

The document examines the 'Commodity Trap' facing the Black Soldier Fly (BSF) industry, where attempts to displace low-cost bulk protein and synthetic fertilisers have struggled due to prohibitive price gaps and scaling hurdles. It recommends that producers shift toward high-value functional additives and bioactive soil amendments, leveraging partnerships with established suppliers to overcome farmer skepticism and regulatory barriers in South Africa.

The document identifies PET, PETG, and PVC shrink sleeves as priority problematic plastics in South Africa because they disrupt the PET bottle recycling process. It argues that substituting these materials with floatable polyolefin sleeves (PE or PP) allows for effective separation via float-sink mechanisms, thereby increasing the number of bottles successfully recycled. While early adopters like Woolworths and SPUR Corporation have successfully transitioned, the report notes that market-wide adoption is hindered by cost premiums and technical adjustments, though these are mitigated by collaboration through the South African Plastics Pact.

The document details a three-year partnership between the Anglo American Foundation and GreenCape to catalyse South Africa's fragmented Black Soldier Fly (BSF) sector. Central to this effort was the establishment of the Southern African Mass Insect Rearing Organisation (SAMIRO), a member-based industry body designed to provide a unified voice for advocacy and regulatory navigation. Despite achieving significant investment and job creation, the sector continues to face challenges from global volatility and waning investor risk appetite, leaving SAMIRO operating as a "minimum viable product."

The document details the global nickel market, highlighting Indonesia's dominance in production and the shifting demand from stainless steel toward electric vehicle batteries. It outlines the technical processing pathways for Class I and Class II nickel, the geopolitical impact of export bans, and the environmental footprints associated with different mining and refining methods.

The policy brief assesses the macroeconomic, financial, and labor risks associated with Colombia's energy transition, particularly for five vulnerable departments. It warns that a disordered transition could lead to the loss of 448,000 jobs by 2035 and increased country risk. To mitigate this, the authors propose an integrated policy package comprising macro-fiscal-financial measures to lower capital costs, territorially differentiated labor protections, and a productive-territorial strategy focusing on 'lever sectors' like electric energy, efficient construction, and agroecology to create sustainable local employment.

The document details WWF and Delterra's pilot projects in Jayapura and Merauke, Papua, which established that households are the primary source of food waste and that significant portions of discarded food remain edible. It identifies a 'missing middle' financing gap for infrastructure investments (typically $1–3 million) and proposes a three-phased approach—starting with prevention, moving to community-scale recovery, and ending with centralized facilities—to align with the waste hierarchy and reduce methane emissions.

A two-year initiative involving three elementary schools in Rockbridge County, Virginia, found that while diversion interventions did not reduce the total amount of food students discarded (plate waste), they successfully diverted nearly 100% of uneaten entrées, fruits, and vegetables from landfills. The project utilized on-site composting via Earth Cubes and off-site diversion to a local farmer for chicken feed. Over two school years, the program diverted 14,221.50 lbs of food, resulting in a reduction of 42.17 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MTCO2e) and $388.34 in avoided landfill fees.

The document examines fiber-based packaging as a renewable alternative to plastic, detailing its composition from wood and agricultural waste. It highlights the significant environmental footprint of the pulp and paper industry, particularly regarding water intensity, energy use, and chemical pollution. The paper advocates for a sourcing hierarchy prioritizing FSC Recycled-certified materials and provides a framework for mitigating end-of-life impacts through circular economy principles and the formalization of informal waste collection systems.

The document advocates for 'lifecycle thinking' in packaging to avoid 'greenwashing' and suboptimal design. It explains that both overpackaging and underpackaging create environmental burdens, and that the optimal design varies by product. The report details the functions of packaging—containment, protection, utility, and communication—and evaluates various end-of-life (EOL) options, noting that waste management infrastructure in low-income countries often relies on open dumps. It concludes that policy interventions like Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) and Deposit Return Schemes (DRS) are essential for improving material collection and sorting.

The document examines the lifecycle of plastic packaging, highlighting the environmental damage caused by fossil-fuel extraction and the social burdens placed on low- and middle-income countries during production. It details the technical distinctions between recyclable, recycled, biobased, and biodegradable plastics, while noting that additives and multi-material layers often hinder recycling efforts. The paper also addresses health risks associated with endocrine disruptors and microplastics, and the challenges of contaminating recycling streams with compostable plastics like PLA.

WWF argues that while substituting plastic with materials like paper, glass, and metal can reduce pollution, it must be a secondary priority to elimination and reuse. The document emphasizes that no single material is universally superior and that substitutions involve trade-offs, such as increased deforestation risks from paper or higher transport emissions from heavier glass and metals. WWF proposes five guiding principles for substitution: responsible sourcing, protecting human health and safety, designing for circularity, aligning with local infrastructure, and utilizing life cycle assessments.

The document examines food waste in Jayapura and Merauke, Indonesia, finding that households are the primary waste generators and that significant portions of discarded food remain edible. It highlights a 'missing middle' financing gap for infrastructure investments (USD 1-3 million) and proposes a three-phase roadmap: starting with prevention and reduction, moving to community-scale recycling (composting and Black Soldier Fly larvae), and finally investing in centralized waste management facilities.

The document argues that current EU textile strategies risk being undermined by the sheer volume of new apparel produced. It advocates for the French draft law's approach to modulate EPR financial contributions based on producers' practices—such as price, number of references, and company size—to create financial incentives against overproduction, aligned with the revised EU Waste Framework Directive.

The report analyzes the transition of the steel industry toward net-zero emissions, highlighting the role of emerging technologies and startups. It identifies the dominance of coal-based blast furnace-basic oxygen furnace (BF-BOF) facilities, which contribute approximately 8 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions, and examines alternatives such as Hydrogen-Direct Reduced Iron (H2-DRI) and scrap-based electric arc furnaces (EAFs). The document categorizes innovations into three pathways: reducing demand ('Make Less'), improving existing processes ('Make Better'), and developing disruptive technologies ('Make New'). It emphasizes the need for strategic investor-offtakers in high-growth markets like Asia and Africa, the potential of modular furnace technologies, and the strategy of generating early revenue through high-margin, low-volume products to derisk commercial scaling.

The report finds that recycled polyester releases significantly more microfibers than virgin polyester, contradicting industry claims of sustainability and highlighting the risks of 'bottle-to-textile' downcycling.

The report argues that the fashion industry's shift to recycled polyester is a form of greenwashing, as recycled synthetic fibres release more microplastics than their virgin counterparts. Based on tests of 51 garments from major brands, the study finds that recycled polyester releases approximately 55% more fibres per gram than virgin polyester, and these fibres are smaller and potentially more toxic. The document also highlights the issue of 'downcycling' plastic bottles into textiles, which removes them from closed-loop recycling and creates garments that cannot be effectively recycled. It concludes that the only fundamental solution is to reduce the overall use of both virgin and recycled synthetic fibres.

The report finds that recycled polyester sheds significantly more and finer microfibres than virgin polyester, challenging industry claims of sustainability. Testing of 51 garments from Adidas, H&M, Nike, Shein, and Zara revealed that recycled polyester released an average of 12,430 fibres per gram, compared to 8,028 for virgin polyester. The study argues that the 'bottle-to-textile' recycling model is a form of downcycling that worsens pollution and allows brands to mask a continued reliance on virgin plastics. It also identifies discrepancies in 'recycled' labelling, particularly with Shein, and calls for EU-wide eco-design criteria and a global plastics treaty to cap virgin plastic production.