Search Climate Insights Directory

The report outlines a stepwise process for EU Member States to develop National Restoration Plans (NRPs) to meet the legally binding targets of the Nature Restoration Law (NRL), which aims to restore 20% of land and sea areas by 2030 and all degraded ecosystems by 2050. It details legal requirements for monitoring, quantification, and stakeholder engagement, while emphasizing the need for policy coherence with the Renewable Energy Directive, Common Agricultural Policy, and Common Fisheries Policy. The document provides 14 specific recommendations to ensure NRPs are ambitious, evidence-based, and well-funded through a mix of public and private sources.

A joint contribution by ClientEarth and other NGOs proposing structural reforms to EU trade policy to align it with the European Green Deal. The authors argue for binding sustainability obligations, independent ex-post monitoring, the introduction of sanctions for non-compliance, and enhanced roles for Domestic Advisory Groups and civil society in the negotiation and enforcement of Trade and Sustainable Development (TSD) chapters.

ClientEarth employs a legal-centric strategy to enforce environmental laws, challenge corporate pollution, and reshape financial systems. Key achievements include winning the right for the public to challenge the EU in court on environmental decisions, securing the closure of coal plants in Europe, and litigating against fossil fuel companies for misleading advertising and abandoned wells. The organization focuses on four primary pillars: breaking new legal ground for justice, aligning financial flows with planetary needs, transforming food and land use, and phasing out fossil fuels in energy and transport.

The document argues that the proposed 35% environmental and climate spending target is insufficient and should be increased to 50%, while removing exemptions for defence and security spending. It identifies significant 'greenwashing' risks in Annex I, specifically regarding targeted support to farmers' income, military mobility, and critical raw materials extraction. The briefing provides a detailed technical reference document proposing changes to over 100 intervention fields, including the deletion of activities that violate the 'Do no significant harm' (DNSH) principle, such as hydropower, nuclear fission, and airport capacity expansion.

ClientEarth opposes a Brazilian bill that would restrict the legal recognition of Indigenous territories to lands occupied as of 1988. The organization argues this 'marco temporal' thesis violates human rights and threatens critical ecosystems like the Amazon and Cerrado, which are essential for global carbon sequestration.

The document outlines the critical intersection of climate change and public health in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), emphasizing that while the region contributes only 6.7% of global greenhouse gas emissions, it faces profound vulnerability. It details how extreme heat, floods, and shifting disease patterns—such as a 54% increase in dengue transmission potential—disproportionately affect marginalized groups, including indigenous peoples and the urban poor. The position paper demands the integration of health into National Determined Contributions (NDCs), the decarbonization of health systems and food production, and the implementation of the Belém Action Plan. It calls for a 'just transition' that protects human rights and incorporates ancestral knowledge, while urging the international community to provide financial and technological transfers to strengthen primary health care and climate resilience in the region.

The report identifies three critical environmental challenges for Canada's mining sector: inadequate mine closure and reclamation, the risk of tailings dam failures, and the cumulative impact of infrastructure on biodiversity. It highlights a legacy of abandoned mines and the 'bankruptcy loophole' that allows companies to avoid cleanup costs. The document compares various Voluntary Sustainability Initiatives (VSIs) and regulatory frameworks, noting Quebec's leadership in financial assurance and British Columbia's Cumulative Effects Framework. It argues that mitigating these risks is a precondition for securing the community support and investor confidence necessary to scale up critical mineral production for the clean energy transition.

The report identifies mine closure, tailings management, and biodiversity loss as the three critical environmental challenges facing Canada's critical minerals sector. It argues that failing to address these risks undermines social acceptance and investor confidence, which are essential for the energy transition. The document highlights the 'mixed and controversial' legacy of abandoned mines and tailings disasters, such as Mount Polley, while contrasting varying provincial regulatory effectiveness, noting Quebec as a leader in financial guarantees. It recommends that Canadian governments reduce bureaucratic discretion in enforcement, mandate early and transparent closure planning, restrict high-risk 'upstream' tailings dams, and adopt regional cumulative effect assessments to protect biodiversity and respect Indigenous land-use planning.

Climate Strategies' 2026-2029 strategy focuses on bridging the gap between research and policy to drive systemic climate change mitigation and adaptation. The organization identifies five strategic impact areas: transitioning oil- and gas-dependent economies, enhancing nature-based food systems, empowering the global majority, governing carbon and climate innovation technologies, and countering climate obstruction. To achieve these, the organization plans to transform its business model by enhancing horizon scanning, diversifying its membership, engaging the private sector through blended models, and strengthening its Secretariat's operational capacity.

The first week of COP30 was characterized by significant friction between developed and developing nations over finance, trade measures, and the 1.5C temperature goal. While some progress was made in operationalizing the Fund for Responding to Loss and Damage and advancing Article 6 carbon market standards, negotiations on the Just Transition Work Programme and the Gender Action Plan stalled due to disagreements over terminology and the role of unilateral trade measures. The Brazilian Presidency launched the Belem Health Action Plan and proposed a framework for synergies between the three Rio Conventions, though many thematic areas remain bracketed heading into the second week.

The COP30 Week 2 debrief details the adoption of the 'Global Mutirão' cover decision, which calls for tripling adaptation finance by 2035 but omits references to fossil fuels and deforestation. Key outcomes include the recommendation for a Just Transition mechanism (BAM) to be operationalized in 2026, the transfer of $26.8 million to the Article 6.4 PACM, and the adoption of the Belém Gender Action Plan. However, significant tensions persisted regarding unilateral trade measures, the 1.5°C temperature goal, and the lack of concrete targets in climate finance and the Global Goal on Adaptation (GGA).

The document provides a detailed analysis of the second week of COP28, highlighting the adoption of the first Global Stocktake (GST) and its call to 'transition away from fossil fuels'. It examines progress and failures across several domains, including the operationalization of the Loss and Damage Fund, the tripling of renewable energy targets, and the lack of binding language in mitigation and adaptation goals. The report also notes the influence of fossil fuel lobbyists and the marginalization of Small Island Developing States and gender-specific concerns during the final decision-making processes.

The Climate Smart Shrimp Fund (CSSF) is a financial mechanism designed to help shrimp farmers increase production efficiency and climate resilience while restoring mangrove ecosystems. The fund consists of a technical assistance facility for training and certification and a revolving debt facility for infrastructure upgrades. Following pilot programs in Indonesia, Ecuador, and the Philippines, the fund seeks various forms of capital, including grants and equity, to scale its operations.

In 2018, IDFC members reported $134 billion in green finance commitments, a 39% decrease from 2017, though cumulative commitments since 2015 exceed $670 billion. Climate finance dominated the total at 93.3%, with green energy and GHG mitigation accounting for 85% of that amount. While overall commitments fell due to macroeconomic factors, adaptation finance grew by 57% over the previous year. Geographically, 78% of finance remained in members' home countries, and the East Asia and Pacific region received the largest share of commitments at 56%.

The report analyzes the intersection of biotechnology, biodiversity, and bioeconomy in Brazil, arguing that while the country possesses immense biological potential, a complex and unpredictable regulatory environment—specifically the Access and Benefit-Sharing (ABS) framework—stifles innovation. It highlights that the SisGen system is cumbersome, benefit-sharing mechanisms are underperforming, and institutional fragmentation across ministries hinders a cohesive national strategy. The authors advocate for the explicit inclusion of 'biodiversity biotechnology' in the PNDBio to transform biological assets into sustainable economic value, especially in the Amazon.

Carbon Market Watch advises the CMA against adopting the Supervisory Body's text on removals under the Article 6.4 mechanism without further guidance to ensure environmental integrity. The organization calls for stricter definitions of removal durability, the creation of a science-based risk assessment tool, mandatory post-crediting monitoring, and clear rules on avoidable reversals and buffer pool replenishment. Regarding methodology development, it suggests requiring proponents to prove carbon credit revenues were a significant income source and conducting additionality analyses for different activity types.

The statement argues that the draft Delegated Act lacks necessary safeguards regarding indirect land-use change, livestock emissions, and long-term carbon storage. It calls for the reinstatement of additionality criteria, the introduction of liability mechanisms for peatlands, and the inclusion of social safeguards to prevent land speculation.

The handbook evaluates six carbon removal methods: BioCCS, afforestation/reforestation, biochar, terrestrial enhanced weathering, DACCS, and soil carbon sequestration. It highlights the trade-offs between permanence, cost, and ecological impact, emphasizing that land-based solutions often conflict with planetary boundaries and food security, while technological solutions like DACCS face high energy and cost barriers. The document recommends prioritizing sustainable feedstocks, rights-based approaches for local communities, and the development of standardized monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) frameworks.

The guide equips National Park Service (NPS) staff to communicate climate change by segmenting the American public into six audience types based on their beliefs and motivations. It provides tailored communication tips for each group—ranging from the 'Alarmed' to the 'Dismissive'—and details specific climate impacts across ten U.S. bioregions to help staff create place-based narratives. The document emphasizes using local park stories and scientific consensus to motivate visitors toward climate action and energy conservation.

The document outlines a classroom activity where students simulate a climate change-related scenario by adopting one of six distinct personas based on the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication's research. These personas—the Alarmed, Concerned, Cautious, Disengaged, Doubtful, and Dismissive—represent unique audiences within the American public. Students are required to use a graphic organizer to develop their character's opinions and evidence, write a script that includes clarifying questions and evidence-based claims, and perform the skit. The guide includes a rubric for grading based on evidence use, collaboration, and performance quality, as well as reflection questions to help students understand the challenges of communicating with people who hold differing views on global warming.