Search Climate Insights Directory

The Climate Bonds Resilience Taxonomy (CBRT) provides a structured framework for identifying and qualifying investments that enhance climate resilience. It categorizes investments across seven themes and various sectors, requiring that each investment addresses at least one physical climate hazard. To be eligible, investments must demonstrate a substantial contribution to resilience, manage maladaptation risks, and adhere to 'Do No Significant Harm' (DNSH) principles regarding climate mitigation and environmental protection. The CBRT distinguishes between 'Adapted' and 'Enabling' investments, as well as 'Activities' and 'Measures', and offers different evaluation pathways—automatic, simplified, or process-based—depending on the investment type. The framework is intended for use by government agencies, financial institutions, real-economy sectors, and market stakeholders to support the issuance and verification of resilience-linked bonds and loans.

The Agrifood Transition Plan Assessment Framework establishes a methodology for evaluating corporate transition strategies in the agrifood sector. It categorizes companies into 'committed' (early) and 'advanced' phases based on the maturity of their transition plans. The framework emphasizes a holistic approach that integrates greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction—specifically targeting methane and nitrous oxide—with nature-based goals such as eliminating deforestation and land conversion. It provides detailed requirements for Paris-aligned targets, action plans for producers and downstream actors, and accountability metrics, while aligning with international disclosure standards like TCFD, TNFD, and ICMA.

The Climate Bonds Initiative (CBI) introduces the 'AAA' framework—comprising Ambition, Action, and Accountability—to evaluate corporate transition plans. The guidance emphasizes that credible plans must include quantitative targets aligned with 1.5°C scientific pathways, robust financial and action plans, strong board-level governance, and transparent annual disclosures. It specifically warns against the over-reliance on carbon offsets and the use of national NDCs as primary decarbonization pathways.

The report highlights a significant gap between current EU agricultural emissions trends and the 2030 and 2050 climate targets. It identifies the absence of agriculture from the EU Taxonomy as a major barrier to defining sustainable activities. The author proposes repurposing the CAP, which accounts for approximately 30% of the EU budget, to fund a transition that requires an estimated annual public investment of EUR 155bn to reduce emissions by 53% by 2050. Key recommendations include adopting science-based sectoral criteria, reforming payment structures to reward green practices, and potentially extending the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) to agrifood products to prevent carbon leakage.

ClientEarth asserts that the European Commission must use its legislative powers to amend or withdraw the current CAP reform proposal, as it conflicts with the climate and biodiversity goals of the European Green Deal. The briefing claims that relying on non-binding recommendations or the goodwill of co-legislators is insufficient and may constitute a breach of EU law principles, specifically those of consistency, good administration, and environmental integration.

ClientEarth supports a combination of regulatory and non-regulatory measures to revise the Renewable Energy Directive (REDII) to align with the European Green Deal. The organization advocates for a 2030 emissions reduction target of at least 65%, the exclusion of non-renewable hydrogen from support, and the removal of biomass from the category of renewable energy sources due to its impact on climate, health, and biodiversity.

A coalition of 76 organisations calls for the European Union to implement a mandatory, digital, and transparent system for collecting pesticide use data. They argue that current proposals for the agriculture statistics regulation (SAIO) are insufficient, as they delay data collection until 2028 and lack necessary detail. The signatories demand that data collection begin by 2025, be mandatory, and be published by active substance, crop, and treated area to protect public health and biodiversity.

The document outlines the critical role of cocoa in Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire, where together they produce over 60% of the cocoa for the USD$130 billion global chocolate industry. It argues that the sector is hindered by poverty, child labor, and deforestation, and proposes a series of research papers to analyze national legal frameworks, identify governance loopholes, and assess the impact of EU and UK regulations on sustainability.

ClientEarth advocates for the implementation of comprehensive framework climate laws (FCLs) to bridge the gap between political ambition in NDCs and domestic action. The brief highlights that current climate commitments are insufficient, with a projected temperature rise of 2.4°C to 2.6°C even if existing NDCs are met. It calls on countries to submit science-driven NDCs by February 2025 and to enshrine these in binding national laws by COP30. The document also details recent international legal precedents from the ICJ, ITLOS, and ECHR that strengthen the legal obligations of states to protect human rights and the environment from climate harm.

ClientEarth advocates for a mandatory due diligence framework for all companies placing forest-risk commodities on the EU market, arguing that such a measure would be more effective than voluntary schemes or certification. The organization emphasizes that due diligence must extend beyond mere compliance with producer-country laws to include the protection of indigenous peoples' land rights and other natural ecosystems. Additionally, ClientEarth calls for the inclusion of the financial sector in the legislation, the strengthening of forest partnerships with producer countries, and the reform of Free Trade Agreements to ensure binding environmental and social standards.

ClientEarth warns that Brazilian Bill 490/2007 restricts Indigenous land demarcation to areas occupied by 1988, potentially impacting over 300 pending cases and increasing vulnerability to illegal land grabbing. The organization argues that denying these rights threatens biodiversity in the Amazon and Cerrado, contributing to global greenhouse gas emissions.

A coalition of civil society organisations advocates for a more ambitious EU regulation on deforestation-free products. They propose expanding the scope to include other natural ecosystems like peatlands and savannahs, broadening the list of covered commodities to include all livestock, rubber, and maize, and implementing stricter due diligence requirements. The statement emphasizes the need for mandatory traceability to the plot of land, the removal of 'simplified' due diligence, and the inclusion of civil and criminal liability for non-compliance to protect indigenous peoples' rights and global biodiversity.

ClientEarth calls for a systemic legal shift in the EU to prioritize planetary boundaries, proposing the appointment of a Vice-President for People and the Environment and the removal of fossil fuel subsidies. The document advocates for binding sustainability requirements in trade, a transition to 'energy sufficiency', and the adoption of a Sustainable Food System legislative framework to address gaps in the European Green Deal.

ClientEarth argues that the European Commission's December 2025 proposals to accelerate environmental assessments and permit-granting for infrastructure projects will lead to irreversible environmental harm and human health risks. The report claims these measures undermine the Birds and Habitats Directives, restrict access to justice, and violate the precautionary and proportionality principles of EU law. Specifically, it warns that the proposals normalize the killing of protected species, create a biased 'strategic sector' permitting regime, and restrict the ability of Member States to exclude ecologically sensitive areas from Renewable Acceleration Areas (RAAs).

The paper examines the history and current state of EU environmental governance, detailing the roles of the Commission, Parliament, Council, and Court of Justice. It highlights a systemic failure in the enforcement of environmental law by Member States and the Commission, noting that economic interests frequently override environmental concerns. The author argues that the EU's 'good governance' principles of openness and participation are poorly implemented, leaving environmental NGOs with limited influence and citizens with minimal access to justice. While the EU has a comprehensive body of legislation, the author concludes that the lack of political will makes much of it a 'paper tiger'.

ClientEarth calls for the European Union to strengthen the rule of law and governance to address climate, biodiversity, and pollution crises. The organization advocates for the creation of a European Commission Vice-President for People and the Environment to oversee the European Green Deal's implementation and urges the EU to end public financial support for harmful activities, specifically fossil fuels and energy-intensive industries. The manifesto emphasizes the need for increased enforcement capacity at both EU and national levels and the strengthening of environmental democracy to ensure public participation and access to justice.

ClientEarth proposes a set of priorities for a new EU leadership role, emphasizing the enforcement of Nature Directives, the alignment of agricultural and fisheries policies with biodiversity laws, and the creation of an EU Ocean Deal and Ocean Fund. The document also calls for the alignment of state aid with climate goals, the phasing out of environmentally harmful subsidies, and the requirement for companies to implement transition plans for climate, biodiversity, and the circular economy.

A coalition of NGOs urges the EU to set 2023 Baltic Sea fishing limits at or below scientific advice, specifically recommending zero catches for several cod and herring stocks. The document argues that current management fails to account for ecosystem dynamics, climate change, and widespread non-compliance with the Landing Obligation, calling for mandatory remote electronic monitoring and a transition away from bottom trawling.

The document argues that current EU legislation on pesticide statistics is inadequate for assessing environmental and health risks. The signatories call for the reform to mandate annual data collection from professional users' records, including biocidal and veterinary medicinal products, and for the proactive publication of this data by active substance, product, and at a regional level to align with the Aarhus Directive and public interest needs.

The document argues that EU fisheries ministers must adhere to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) and scientific advice from the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) to end overfishing. It provides specific TAC recommendations for cod, herring, sprat, plaice, and salmon, emphasizing a precautionary, ecosystem-based approach to protect biodiversity and restore marine foodweb functionality in the Baltic Sea.