Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The paper examines the history and current state of EU environmental governance, detailing the roles of the Commission, Parliament, Council, and Court of Justice. It highlights a systemic failure in the enforcement of environmental law by Member States and the Commission, noting that economic interests frequently override environmental concerns. The author argues that the EU's 'good governance' principles of openness and participation are poorly implemented, leaving environmental NGOs with limited influence and citizens with minimal access to justice. While the EU has a comprehensive body of legislation, the author concludes that the lack of political will makes much of it a 'paper tiger'.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • EU environmental policy has seen a decline in importance since the start of the 21st century, driven by the accession of Member States with limited environmental policies, a shift toward liberal economic thinking within EU institutions, and a lack of political will to enforce agreed-upon protections.
  • Enforcement of EU environmental law is severely deficient due to the lack of administrative structures, such as inspectors, and a long, confidential infringement procedure under Articles 258 and 260 TFEU that takes an average of 47 months to 5 years to reach a judgment.
  • The EU Court of Justice is generally viewed as 'environment-friendly' and has expanded EU competence in areas like criminal environmental law, but it maintains a very restrictive interpretation of 'direct and individual concern,' which effectively denies environmental NGOs and citizens standing to bring cases.
  • Public participation in EU environmental decision-making is limited by language barriers (dominance of English), the technical nature of the content, and a lack of transparency in the Council's legislative process, where minutes are not made available.
  • The EU has failed to achieve coherence in integrating environmental requirements into other policies, evidenced by continued financial support for the coal and nuclear industries over renewable energies and a lack of progress on biodiversity loss and chemical pollution.

Cite the original document

APA
Krämer, L. (n.d.). EU Environmental Governance. ClientEarth. https://www.clientearth.org/media/20pmfmnj/eu-environmental-governance-coll-en.pdf
Chicago
Krämer, Ludwig. EU Environmental Governance. ClientEarth, n.d. https://www.clientearth.org/media/20pmfmnj/eu-environmental-governance-coll-en.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Krämer |first1=Ludwig |title=EU Environmental Governance |publisher=ClientEarth |url=https://www.clientearth.org/media/20pmfmnj/eu-environmental-governance-coll-en.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{krmerndenvironmental, author = {Krämer, Ludwig}, title = {{EU Environmental Governance}}, institution = {ClientEarth}, url = {https://www.clientearth.org/media/20pmfmnj/eu-environmental-governance-coll-en.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated