Search Climate Insights Directory

Natural Justice argues that South Africa's Gas Master Plan is incompatible with the country's climate commitments and the Climate Change Bill. The submission highlights risks including fugitive methane emissions, fossil fuel dependency, and the potential for inadequate compensation for land expropriation. It calls for a transition toward renewable energy, the adoption of the 'free prior and informed consent' (FPIC) principle for affected communities, and a more transparent public participation process.

In 2021, Turkey's non-hydro renewable generation overtook hydropower for the first time, with wind and solar reaching a record 44.6 TWh. While coal generation declined for three consecutive years between 2018 and 2021 due to high import costs, gas generation increased to compensate for drought-induced hydropower losses, pushing the fossil fuel share to 65% in 2021. Despite the growth in renewables, the increase in production (+58 TWh since 2011) failed to keep pace with the surge in power demand (+95 TWh), resulting in a carbon intensity of power that has not significantly improved in at least 30 years.

The report outlines a strategy for the Norwegian culture sector to align with the UN Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement. It identifies a shift in the sector from merely inspiring others to addressing its own carbon footprint, highlighting tools like the Green Producers Tool and certifications such as Miljøfyrtårn. The authors propose three main instruments: making sustainability goals the foundation of all cultural policy, requiring sustainability information for all public funding, and establishing a dedicated competence center for sustainability, climate, and culture, potentially linked to the Sustainability Center in Trondheim.

In a letter dated 13 January 2022, Milieudefensie/Friends of the Earth Netherlands calls on 29 large Dutch enterprises to implement climate plans aligned with the Paris Agreement. Citing a court ruling against Royal Dutch Shell, the organization argues that large emitters have a responsibility to reduce scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions. They request a climate-just plan by 15 April 2022, targeting a minimum 45% reduction in CO2 emissions by 2030 relative to 2019. The New Climate Institute will evaluate these plans, with results to be published as a ranking in June 2022.

ClientEarth supports the FCA's proposed SDR and labelling framework in principle but warns that without strict criteria and enforcement, the regime could formalise greenwashing. The organization advocates for the adoption of 'double materiality' in disclosures, the removal of the 'Responsible' label, and the refinement of the 'Sustainable-Transition' label to avoid confusion with climate-specific terminology. It further calls for mandatory sustainability impact metrics and a clear enforcement roadmap to ensure accountability for fund managers.

The report assesses Amundi, Europe's largest asset manager, claiming a gap between its sustainable finance marketing and its actual investments. It highlights three primary climate risks: the growth of passive management which bypasses fossil fuel exclusions, a failure to use shareholder voting to penalize coal developers, and continued financial support for oil and gas expansion, including in the Arctic.

The report argues that the climate pledges of major oil and gas companies are 'empty promises' designed to deceive the public. It finds that none of the analyzed companies' plans meet the standards required to limit warming to 1.5°C, as they often exclude Scope 3 emissions, rely on unproven carbon capture technology, and continue to invest in fossil fuel exploration and production.

The report finds that while global climate finance almost doubled between 2011 and 2020 to a cumulative USD 4.8 trillion, current growth rates are insufficient to meet climate goals. Renewable energy dominates mitigation finance, while adaptation and sectors like agriculture and industry remain severely underfunded. A significant barrier is the continued high level of fossil fuel subsidies, which exceeded total climate finance during the decade. The report emphasizes the need for a 20% annual increase in finance by 2030, reaching USD 4.3 trillion annually, and calls for holistic sectoral strategies and a shift in the financial paradigm to mobilize private capital.

The report finds that climate finance for AFOLU sectors is severely underfunded, representing only 2.5% of total tracked climate finance in 2019/20. While overall trends were positive between 2013 and 2020, a 20% drop occurred between 2017/18 and 2019/20. The sectors require an estimated USD 423.4 billion annually by 2030 to align with the Paris Agreement, a nearly 26-fold increase over 2019/20 levels. Finance is dominated by public sources, with significant gaps in private investment and a stagnation in adaptation funding. Geographically, East Asia and the Pacific are the primary recipients, followed by Sub-Saharan Africa.

A 2022 report by the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication and CVoter based on a survey of 4,619 Indian adults. It finds that while general awareness of the term 'global warming' remains low, a large majority of Indians believe it is happening, is human-caused, and is personally important. There is strong public support for renewable energy, the Paris Climate Agreement, and government action, alongside high reported vulnerability to extreme weather events like droughts and floods.

The document analyzes thirty years of UN climate negotiations, arguing that countries in the Global North, particularly the United States, have consistently and deliberately obstructed the creation of a loss and damage finance mechanism. It divides this history into four periods: the initial efforts from 1991 to 2007, the lead-up to the Warsaw International Mechanism (2008-2013), the road to the Paris Agreement (2014-2015), and the post-Paris era (2016-present). The author highlights how advocates from the Global South, including AOSIS and the G77, shifted their framing from legal liability to moral risk to gain traction, while obstructionists used tactics such as conflating loss and damage with adaptation, proposing limited insurance alternatives, and explicitly excluding liability and compensation from official texts, most notably in Paragraph 51 of the Paris Agreement decision.

The document outlines six specific proposals to reform financial practices in France and the European Union to combat climate change. These include banning the financing of new fossil fuel projects, introducing a 'nutri-score' for the carbon impact of financial products, increasing capital requirements for banks supporting fossil fuels, aligning European Central Bank (ECB) operations with climate goals, ending export financing for hydrocarbons, and strengthening shareholder rights to influence corporate climate strategies.

The document outlines the policy tracking approach used in the Chilling Prospects series to assess sustainable cooling progress in the 'Critical 9' countries. It details the goals of this tracking, the specific policy areas assessed, and the data sources used to evaluate regulatory, information, and incentive policies across various cooling technologies and needs.

The report finds that while countries are making incremental progress in strengthening their NDCs, the current pace and scale of ambition are insufficient to meet the Paris Agreement goals. By September 2022, 139 new or updated NDCs had been communicated, aiming for a 2030 emissions reduction of 5.5 GtCO2e more than initial commitments, which represents a 7 percent reduction from 2019 levels—far below the 43 percent reduction required for the 1.5°C target. The analysis highlights that 77 percent of NDCs include GHG reduction targets, 86 percent include adaptation components, and 53 percent estimate finance requirements totaling nearly $4.3 trillion.

WWF advocates for a nature-positive transition to offshore renewable energy, emphasizing the need to balance the projected sevenfold increase in offshore wind capacity by 2030 with the protection of seabed habitats, fisheries, and local communities. The organization works with developers to adopt frameworks like the Science-Based Targets for Nature and the Task Force on Nature-related Financial Disclosures, while urging financial institutions to use their leverage to fund innovative, nature-positive strategies in line with the Paris Agreement.

The document proposes the creation of the 'Brazilian Platform of sustainability', an integrated system and information toolkit designed to unify fragmented public and private traceability and certification data for cattle and soybeans in the Legal Amazon. The initiative aims to address information gaps that hinder the enforcement of deforestation-free supply chains and the effectiveness of existing moratoriums. By connecting databases like the Rural Environmental Registry (CAR) and the Brazilian Traceability Service of the Cattle and Buffalo Production Chains (SISBOV), the platform intends to increase transparency, attract private investment for low-emission agriculture, and support Brazil's Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) under the Paris Agreement. The project, implemented by the FAO over 24 months with a budget of USD 449,510, will establish a governance model involving government agencies, industry associations, and NGOs to foster a sustainable agricultural economy.

Reclaim Finance reports that Amundi continues to support coal-expanding companies despite a 2019 commitment to exit the sector. The analysis finds that 94% of coal companies in the portfolios of major French financial institutions lack satisfactory exit plans, and Amundi is invested in all of them. The document highlights failures in Amundi's passive management strategy, where it voted in favor of 78% of resolutions from 13 coal developers, and criticizes its engagement policy for lacking precise requirements and binding sanctions.

The Changing Markets Foundation and other organisations urge the European Commission to strengthen the 2020 EU Methane Strategy by setting specific EU-wide and national targets for the agriculture sector. They highlight that agriculture accounts for 53% of anthropogenic methane emissions in the EU, with the vast majority coming from enteric fermentation and manure management. The authors call for binding monitoring, reporting, and reduction measures for large meat and dairy corporations, noting that none of the 20 largest EU-headquartered firms in this sector currently report their methane emissions. They specifically recommend targeting large farms with more than 50 livestock units, which are responsible for approximately 40% of all methane emissions in the EU.

ClientEarth argues that UK auditors are systemically failing to apply existing accounting and audit standards to climate-related financial risks. Citing the FRC's own 2020 Climate Thematic Review and a report by Carbon Tracker and the Carbon Accounting Project, the letter claims that auditors frequently ignore climate-sensitive assumptions and fail to ensure financial statements are Paris-aligned. ClientEarth calls on the FRC to move beyond monitoring and take meaningful enforcement action, including public investigations into the 'big four' firms (EY, Deloitte, KPMG, and PwC) and stricter oversight of Recognised Supervisory Bodies (RSBs).

ClientEarth criticizes the Society of Lloyd’s ESG Guidance for being non-binding and lacking transparency, short-term targets, and a fossil fuel phase-out plan. The letter asserts that the Guidance represents a retreat from previous commitments and risks legal breaches regarding climate risk management and public disclosure.