Search Climate Insights Directory

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) has developed an operational framework to improve integration and coherence across climate finance institutions. The framework is organized around four pillars: board-level discussions on fund-to-fund arrangements, activity-level integration, national programming coherence, and a high-level annual dialogue. It aims to reduce inefficiencies and maximize impact by aligning policies, sharing information, and coordinating with other funds such as the Global Environment Facility (GEF) and the Adaptation Fund (AF).

The document outlines the GCF's accreditation process, which is divided into three stages: no-objection and readiness, accreditation review and decision, and final arrangements. It defines the fiduciary standards (basic and specific) and environmental and social safeguards (ESS) that applicants must meet. The framework distinguishes between 'direct access' for national/regional entities and 'international access' for global organizations. It also details the roles of the GCF Board, Secretariat, Accreditation Committee, and Accreditation Panel in managing the process.

The document is a compilation of inputs regarding the GCF's accreditation process. Key themes include the need to prioritize National Implementing Entities (NIEs) over international ones to ensure country ownership, the demand for a more 'fit-for-purpose' approach for smaller or private sector entities, and proposals to monitor the overall carbon footprints of accredited entities to ensure they align with the Paris Agreement. Stakeholders highlight systemic delays in the accreditation pipeline and suggest streamlining processes through third-party verification and multi-language support.

The Green Climate Fund's Accreditation Panel recommends the accreditation of Applicant 011 (APL011) for large-scale projects and high environmental and social risk categories. APL011, a regional financial institution in Latin America and the Caribbean, met basic and specialized fiduciary standards, including on-lending and grant allocation. While it substantially meets environmental and social safeguard (ESS) requirements, accreditation is conditional upon the finalization of its consolidated blueprint for E&S management and alignment of its performance standard 2 with the Fund's ESS. The applicant also demonstrated consistency with the Fund's gender policy, despite lacking a track record in gender and climate change.

The Accreditation Panel (AP) recommends the accreditation of Applicant 015 (APL015) for 'Large' project sizes and 'High risk' (Category A/I-1) environmental and social risk categories. The applicant, a public international financial institution operating in over 90 developing countries, was assessed via a fast-track process as an EU DEVCO entity. The AP found that APL015 fully meets the Fund's basic and specialized fiduciary standards, including project management, grant award mechanisms, and on-lending/blending. It also complies with interim environmental and social safeguards (ESS) and gender policies, although it was advised to finalize its formal stakeholder complaints mechanism.

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) Accreditation Panel recommends the Caribbean Development Bank (CDB) for accreditation as a regional entity for 'small' projects (up to USD 50 million) with a high environmental and social risk category (Category A/I-1). The CDB demonstrated strong fiduciary standards, a track record of mobilizing approximately USD 200 million for climate action, and a robust gender equality policy. However, accreditation is conditional upon the CDB establishing a public system for reporting the progress of grant-funded projects and finalizing a permanent external communications mechanism for environmental and social complaints.

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) Accreditation Panel (AP) recommends the accreditation of Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH (APL038) for international access under a fast-track process. GIZ is recommended for a 'medium' project size limit (up to USD 250 million), medium environmental and social risk (Category B/I-2), and specific fiduciary functions including project management and grant award mechanisms. The recommendation is conditional upon GIZ submitting an operational manual detailing its fiduciary due diligence process, specifically regarding 'know your customer' and anti-money laundering (AML) standards. The assessment highlights GIZ's global presence in over 130 countries and its track record of managing approximately 1,300 projects as of December 2014, with 40% being climate-related.

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) Accreditation Panel recommends the South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI) for accreditation as a national direct access entity. SANBI is approved for 'small' project sizes, medium environmental and social risk (Category B/I-2), and specific fiduciary functions, including project management and grant award mechanisms. While the panel found SANBI's grant award mechanisms to be 'mature and well-established', it noted a lack of monitoring reports under a newly established process manual. Consequently, accreditation is conditional upon SANBI submitting periodic monitoring reports for two Adaptation Fund (AF) projects: 'Building resilience in the Greater uMngeni Catchment' and 'Taking adaptation to the ground: a small grants facility for enabling local level responses to climate change in South Africa'.

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) Accreditation Panel recommends the accreditation of the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) for international access under a fast-track process. IFAD is approved for medium-sized projects (up to USD 250 million) and medium environmental and social risk (Category B/I-2). The assessment confirms IFAD meets basic and specialized fiduciary standards, including project management, grant award mechanisms, and on-lending/blending. The panel also validated IFAD's environmental and social safeguards and its gender policy, noting its extensive experience in increasing the climate resilience of rural farming systems.

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) Accreditation Panel assessed PROPARCO, a subsidiary of Agence Française de Développement (AFD), for international access to climate finance. The assessment found that PROPARCO meets most fiduciary and gender policy standards and is capable of managing high-risk environmental and social projects, provided it implements a formal external complaint mechanism. While PROPARCO demonstrated a strong track record in loans and equity, it only partially demonstrated its capacity for guarantee operations, leading to a conditional recommendation for accreditation.

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) Accreditation Panel recommends the accreditation of the World Wildlife Fund, Inc. (WWF) under a fast-track process. The assessment confirms that WWF meets the GCF's basic and specialized fiduciary standards, environmental and social safeguards for medium-risk projects, and gender policy requirements. WWF is recommended for international access to manage projects of 'medium' size (up to USD 250 million) with a maximum environmental and social risk category of 'medium risk' (Category B/I-2).

The Accreditation Panel (AP) assessed PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (PT SMI), a state-owned Indonesian entity, for GCF accreditation. While PT SMI has a track record in financing renewable energy and climate-resilient infrastructure, the AP found it only 'partially meets' several GCF fiduciary and environmental and social standards due to a recent transition in its business model. Consequently, the AP recommends accrediting PT SMI for 'small' project sizes and 'medium' environmental and social risk (Category B/I-2), rather than the 'large' size and 'high' risk (Category A/I-1) categories requested. Accreditation is conditional upon the applicant fulfilling several requirements, including formalizing its procurement framework, enhancing grant management, and demonstrating full application of its 2016 environmental, social, and gender guidelines.

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) Accreditation Panel recommends the accreditation of the Infrastructure Development Company Limited (IDCOL) in Bangladesh for medium-sized projects with medium environmental and social risk. While IDCOL demonstrated strong capabilities in renewable energy and fiduciary management, the recommendation is conditional upon the adoption of several board-approved policies regarding internal audits, codes of conduct, project closure, and public disclosure.

The GCF approved USD 3.7 billion for 76 projects across 79 developing countries, targeting a reduction of 1.3 billion metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent. Key operational developments include the launch of the Simplified Approval Process (SAP) Pilot Scheme, the adoption of an Indigenous Peoples Policy, and the establishment of an Environmental and Social Policy. The fund is also preparing for its first formal replenishment process and expanding its private sector engagement through dedicated pilot programmes for MSMEs and resource mobilization at scale.

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) is reviewing its accreditation framework to address imbalances in its portfolio of accredited entities (AEs) and the time-consuming nature of the current process. A consultant's review found that while standards are appropriate, the portfolio is under-representative of direct access and private sector entities. Proposed improvements include streamlining the technical review process by using external consultants and a roster of firms, with an estimated 2019 budget of USD 700,000 for Stage II reviews. Additionally, the GCF proposes a Project-Specific Assessment Approach (PSAA) as a complementary modality to allow entities to be assessed for a single project rather than undergoing full institutional accreditation. The PSAA targets direct access entities and projects in the Micro to Small categories, with a proposed 2019 budget of USD 600,000 for its implementation.

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) Accreditation Panel recommends the accreditation of IL&FS Environmental Infrastructure and Services Limited (IEISL), a private sector entity in India, for 'small' projects with a 'medium risk' environmental and social category. While IEISL demonstrated strong capabilities in project management, environmental and social safeguards, and gender policy, the assessment identified gaps in its basic fiduciary standards, specifically regarding procurement dispute resolution, conflict of interest guidance, and reliance on related-party funding. Accreditation is recommended subject to several conditions, including the recruitment of a gender expert and the update of its prohibited practices policies.

The Green Climate Fund's Accreditation Panel recommends the accreditation of Yes Bank Limited, a private sector financial institution in India, for medium-sized projects with a maximum environmental and social risk category of B/I-2. While the bank fully meets basic fiduciary and E&S standards, it partially meets specialized fiduciary standards for project management, grant awards, and on-lending due to a lack of demonstrated implementation of its Information Disclosure Policy. It also partially meets gender policy requirements due to limited in-house capacity for gender risk assessment. Accreditation is recommended subject to conditions regarding gender capacity building and the public disclosure of GCF project progress and results.

The Green Climate Fund's Accreditation Panel recommends the accreditation of La Banque Agricole (LBA) in Senegal for small-scale projects with a medium environmental and social risk category (I-2). While LBA demonstrates strong basic fiduciary standards and a robust environmental and social management system, the recommendation is subject to six conditions to be met before the first funding proposal. These conditions include establishing procedures to oversee the procurement and loan portfolios of executing entities, demonstrating the application of updated environmental and social tools, and strengthening gender mainstreaming capacity through the appointment of a focal point and the creation of a gender committee.

The document outlines mandatory conditions and recommendations for multiple GCF funding proposals across various countries. General conditions for all proposals include the signing of a funded activity agreement (FAA) and completion of legal due diligence. Specific conditions target projects in Afghanistan (mini-grid market governance), Colombia (REDD+ emission reductions), Ghana (sustainability of shea landscapes), Sudan (conflict analysis and water infrastructure), and others. Recommendations from the independent Technical Advisory Panel (TAP) focus on quality assurance in Indonesia, policy advocacy in Nepal, and gender-inclusive decision-making in Sudan.

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) Accreditation Panel recommends the accreditation of the National Trust for Nature Conservation (NTNC) in Nepal for 'micro' sized projects with 'minimal to no risk' (Category C) environmental and social risk. While the NTNC's policies and capacities generally meet GCF standards, the assessment identified gaps in its track record regarding the implementation of recently approved fiduciary and environmental and social management systems. Consequently, accreditation is recommended subject to several conditions, including the establishment of an independent Complaints Committee and the provision of evidence demonstrating the application of its financial, risk management, and monitoring frameworks over subsequent years.