Annex XII: Accreditation assessment of Applicant 041 (APL041)

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) Accreditation Panel recommends the accreditation of the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) for international access under a fast-track process. IFAD is approved for medium-sized projects (up to USD 250 million) and medium environmental and social risk (Category B/I-2). The assessment confirms IFAD meets basic and specialized fiduciary standards, including project management, grant award mechanisms, and on-lending/blending. The panel also validated IFAD's environmental and social safeguards and its gender policy, noting its extensive experience in increasing the climate resilience of rural farming systems.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) is recommended for GCF accreditation with a 'medium' maximum project size, defined as costs above USD 50 million and up to USD 250 million.
  • IFAD is approved for a maximum environmental and social risk category of 'medium risk' (Category B/Intermediation 2), which covers activities with potential mild adverse impacts that are generally site-specific and reversible.
  • As of August 2016, IFAD managed USD 594 million in climate and environmental finance, focusing on rural farming systems and value chains.
  • IFAD's climate finance portfolio includes significant blended finance projects in several countries: USD 133 million in Bangladesh, USD 116 million in Kenya, USD 83 million in Rwanda, and USD 119 million in Sudan.
  • The applicant's fiduciary standards were found to be compliant, including a zero-tolerance anti-money laundering (AML) and countering the financing of terrorism (CFT) policy aligned with the United Nations system.
  • IFAD utilizes a 'twin, simultaneous screening process' to separately identify environmental and social (E&S) risks and climate risks for its projects.
  • IFAD's gender policy is consistent with GCF requirements, with gender performance rated as moderately satisfactory or better in 90% of its projects between 2012 and 2014.

Cite the original document

APA
Green Climate Fund (n.d.). Annex XII: Accreditation assessment of Applicant 041 (APL041). https://www.greenclimate.fund/sites/default/files/decision/b14/decision-b14-11-b14-a12.pdf
Chicago
Green Climate Fund. Annex XII: Accreditation assessment of Applicant 041 (APL041). n.d. https://www.greenclimate.fund/sites/default/files/decision/b14/decision-b14-11-b14-a12.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=Green Climate Fund |title=Annex XII: Accreditation assessment of Applicant 041 (APL041) |url=https://www.greenclimate.fund/sites/default/files/decision/b14/decision-b14-11-b14-a12.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{greenclimatefundndannex, author = {{Green Climate Fund}}, title = {{Annex XII: Accreditation assessment of Applicant 041 (APL041)}}, institution = {Green Climate Fund}, url = {https://www.greenclimate.fund/sites/default/files/decision/b14/decision-b14-11-b14-a12.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated