Search Climate Insights Directory

The World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) asserts that climate change is the most critical sustainable development challenge and that sustainable energy access is a primary lever for eradicating poverty. The authors call for the final text of the UN Sustainable Development Goals to explicitly include both climate mitigation and adaptation measures, as well as the scaling up of sustainable energy access, to ensure global action and partnership between public and private sectors.

The author asserts that climate change threatens to reverse development gains and undermine efforts to end poverty. The text emphasizes that the UN Climate Summit and the transition from Millennium Development Goals to Sustainable Development Goals are critical opportunities to integrate climate resilience with poverty eradication. It highlights specific solutions, such as renewable energy and energy-efficient technologies, as drivers of economic growth and public health.

The document highlights that approximately 150 million people in the United States live in areas failing to meet federal air quality standards, with passenger and heavy-duty vehicles serving as major sources of pollutants like nitrogen oxides and particulate matter. It links these emissions to severe health outcomes, including respiratory ailments, heart disease, and up to 20,000 premature deaths annually from PM2.5. The text argues that while clean technologies and emission standards have significantly reduced pollution since 1970, current administrative rollbacks of policies like the Clean Air Act threaten these public health gains.

Waterkeepers Washington and the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations are urging the Governor of Washington to establish protective water quality standards based on actual fish consumption rates. They argue that the current rate of 6.5 grams per day is inadequate and fails to protect citizens, particularly high-consumption communities, from toxic pollution in waterways like the Duwamish and Columbia rivers.

The document is a formal letter from a broad coalition of international organizations opposing the inclusion of investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) in the Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). The authors argue that ISDS allows corporations to challenge non-discriminatory government policies in private tribunals, potentially forcing taxpayers to compensate companies for implementing public health, environmental, and labor regulations. They cite examples of ISDS being used to attack clean energy and toxic waste regulations, and argue that the domestic court systems of the US and EU are sufficient for handling investment disputes.

The Climate Action Network (CAN) emphasizes the urgency of reducing emissions due to a shrinking global carbon budget, calling for developed countries to lead in finance and mitigation. CAN highlights that 66 developing countries—representing a fifth of global CO2 emissions—either lack pledges or have NAMAs that are not specific enough for quantification, and urges all developing nations to adopt common rules for baselines and monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV).

The Clean Air Task Force (CATF) argues that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) should use its authority under Clean Air Act section 111(d) to mandate deep carbon dioxide reductions from existing fossil fuel-fired power plants. CATF asserts that these reductions are necessary to protect public health and meet President Obama's goal of reducing U.S. greenhouse gas emissions by 17 percent below 2005 levels by 2020. Based on analyses conducted with The NorthBridge Group, CATF claims that power sector carbon pollution could be reduced by more than 25 percent from 2005 levels by 2020 without increasing monthly bills for electric ratepayers, primarily by optimizing the dispatch of existing plants to favor efficient natural gas units over inefficient coal units.

A coalition of national and regional organizations is advocating for the re-authorization and funding of the Farm Bill's energy title to support the growth of clean energy industries, rural jobs, and agricultural diversification in the United States.

The president of Friends of the Earth U.S. advocates for a Robin Hood Tax to address the global climate crisis. The author contends that the trillions of dollars required for climate action cannot be met by current 'anemic' global funding efforts, which often repurpose existing aid for health and education or rely on private investors. The text highlights climate-driven disasters in Asia, Europe, Australia, Africa, the Maldives, and Alaska as evidence of the urgent need for a dedicated, non-privatized funding mechanism to ensure global justice and a livable planet.

Friends of the Earth South Africa and groundWork argue that the South African government is rushing to lift the fracking moratorium without transparent impact studies or meaningful public consultation. They contend that promises of job creation by corporations like Royal Dutch Shell are misleading and that fracking would exacerbate socio-economic inequalities and environmental degradation. The authors highlight the climate risk, noting that methane is a more powerful greenhouse gas than CO2, and urge the president to protect regions like the Karoo and KwaZulu-Natal by pursuing renewable energy alternatives.

A coalition of organizations requests that the French government provide transparency regarding EDF Trading's involvement in and subsequently withdraw its approval for CDM project 2716, a coal-fired power plant in Mundra, India. The authors argue the project fails sustainable development criteria due to environmental damage, lack of community consultation, and flawed carbon crediting methodologies.

The Centre for Environmental Rights (CER) is challenging Eskom's application to postpone or be exempt from minimum emission standards (MES) for sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter across 17 power stations. CER argues that Eskom's current process lacks necessary health and environmental risk assessments and provides insufficient time for public consultation, which could make any resulting government decision subject to judicial review under the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act (PAJA).

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and co-chairs from Ethiopia, Liberia, and Norway advocate for a global energy goal in the Post-2015 Development Agenda to address a severe energy gap. The communiqué highlights that four out of five people in LDCs lack electricity and nine out of ten lack modern cooking fuels. It argues that sustainable energy is essential for poverty eradication and climate mitigation, urging the international community to provide financial support and policy frameworks to facilitate a transition to a green economy.

The Declaration on Climate Justice argues that the global response to climate change must prioritize human rights, equity, and the needs of the most vulnerable. It outlines six priority pathways: empowering affected communities, transitioning to a low-carbon economy, reforming investment models, ensuring government accountability, and strengthening the rule of law. The declaration emphasizes that developed countries must lead in reducing emissions and providing climate finance to ensure a just transition and a sustainable global society.

A coalition of organizations calls for the suspension of the Keystone XL pipeline review process, alleging that the consulting firm ERM lied on conflict-of-interest forms regarding its relationships with TransCanada and other oil companies involved in Canadian tar sands.

Intervenors, represented by Earthjustice, submitted additional evidence to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to argue that the proposed Dominion Cove Point LNG facility faces significant climate-related risks. The submission includes a NOAA report predicting an above-normal 2013 Atlantic hurricane season, a Maryland Climate Change Commission report projecting sea-level rise of up to 5.7 feet by 2100, and an IPIECA report on oil and gas industry adaptation. The intervenors contend that these factors increase the likelihood of catastrophic facility breaches or ship accidents and demand a comprehensive climate risk assessment covering the project's design, location, and shipping activities.

A group of international environmental and science organizations called on IATA to support a global market-based measure (MBM) to reduce aviation emissions. The letter argues that technical and operational measures alone are insufficient to meet climate targets and that a fragmented approach of domestic policies will not achieve science-based goals. The signatories demand that any MBM include science-compatible targets, strict compliance, and limited access to offsets.

The Environmental and Energy Study Institute advocates for mandatory funding in the 2013 Farm Bill's energy title to support biofuels, biomass, and bio-based products. It argues that such investment is necessary to develop biomass feedstock production, finance the first commercial-scale advanced biorefineries, and help rural communities transition to renewable energy, citing the 2008 Farm Bill's $1 billion investment as a successful precedent.

The Environmental and Energy Study Institute advocates for $1.3 billion in mandatory funding for the 2013 Farm Bill's energy title to support the transition to sustainable bio-based products and renewable energy. The organization argues that such investment is necessary to establish biomass production systems, support the first commercial-scale advanced biorefineries via loan guarantees, and help rural communities shift away from expensive fossil fuels.

A group of health organisations, including the Climate and Health Alliance, wrote to WHO Director-General Dr Margaret Chan to highlight the urgent health risks posed by climate change. They specifically drew attention to the Doha Declaration on Climate, Health and Wellbeing, which calls for health protection to be a central priority in global and national climate policy, increased investment in mitigation and adaptation, and greater engagement of the health sector. The letter urges the WHO to treat these issues as a high priority and to share the Declaration with the Executive Board.