Search Climate Insights Directory

The document provides a comprehensive framework for understanding climate mis- and disinformation, detailing how a coordinated 'counter-movement' of fossil fuel interests and conservative actors uses tactics like greenwashing, astroturfing, and science denial to obstruct political action. It distinguishes between misinformation (unintentional) and disinformation (deliberate) and highlights the role of social media 'mis-/disinfluencers'. To counter these trends, the briefing recommends systemic platform policies, government regulation, and psychological interventions such as prebunking and debunking.

The document outlines how community benefits programs—ranging from voluntary to mandatory agreements—can provide grants, workforce opportunities, and financial compensation to ensure a just clean energy transition and reduce community opposition to infrastructure projects.

The document defines 'high-hanging fruit' as decarbonisation measures that are inaccessible to host governments due to extraordinary costs or insurmountable barriers. It argues that these projects are essential for enhancing overall climate ambition and proposes a shift in how voluntary climate finance and carbon crediting mechanisms identify and fund them. The author suggests redefining 'additionality' to include project inaccessibility, introducing specific labels for such projects, establishing dedicated funds for climate contributions, and calling for leadership from corporations and intermediaries to develop a project pipeline.

The NewClimate Institute introduces the concept of climate contributions as a financial commitment to support global climate action without claiming to offset or neutralise a company's own emissions. This approach is presented as a necessary alternative to traditional carbon offsetting, which the authors argue can undermine decarbonisation progress.

The guide describes 'book and claim' as a flexible chain of custody model where producers 'book' emissions savings from clean fuels or materials in one location, and customers 'claim' those benefits for climate disclosures elsewhere via certificates. This system is designed to channel finance into nascent decarbonization technologies, such as sustainable aviation fuel (SAF), by allowing corporations to cover the price premium of cleaner alternatives when physical offtake is impractical. To ensure accountability, the system relies on independent verification of the physical supply chain, the use of registries to prevent double counting, and adherence to standardized reporting guidelines.

The paper explores the operationalisation of 'just resilience' in European climate adaptation, emphasizing the need to protect vulnerable populations who are disproportionately at risk and often excluded from adaptation processes. It identifies three core dimensions of justice—distributive, procedural, and recognition—alongside additional perspectives like intergenerational justice and intersectionality, to inform the development of goals and indicators for monitoring progress in line with EU policies such as the European Green Deal.

The research explores the application of service design in the Global South, using case studies in Kenya and Uganda to demonstrate how human-centred tools can address multidimensional poverty and complex social-ecological systems. It proposes a conceptual framework bridging service design with the capabilities approach to better align interventions with local contexts and normative development goals.

The research evaluates climate neutrality trajectories in nine Swedish cities, finding that while political will and targets are strong, there are significant gaps in transport, construction, and food sectors. The authors highlight a disconnect between intent and outcomes, noting that the reliance on 'soft' policy instruments and contradictory economic incentives hinders progress, and recommend a shift toward more regulatory instruments and better alignment with superordinate governments.

The document defines knowledge brokering as the process of linking knowledge producers and users to move knowledge into action. It emphasizes that while scientific evidence is necessary, it is insufficient alone to drive policy shifts. The text argues that climate knowledge brokers must now move beyond mere information dissemination toward 'innovation brokering,' acting as facilitators of change who integrate western scientific, experiential, and Indigenous knowledge to build a climate-resilient world.

The document outlines a spectrum of knowledge brokering roles—infomediary, knowledge translator, knowledge co-creator, and innovation broker—emphasizing that moving knowledge into action requires navigating power dynamics and institutional silos. It advocates for a transition toward 'innovation brokering' to achieve systemic change, highlighting a case study in Namibia where the University of Namibia combined climate impact data with capacity strengthening and partnership building to influence policy.

The document highlights the invisible but crucial role of women in the traditional use and defense of forests and biodiversity. It argues that community forest management (CFM) must be framed through a feminist lens to address gender discrimination, violence, and the exclusion of women from decision-making processes. The text asserts that the intersection of capitalism and patriarchy marginalizes women's rights to land ownership and resource management, and calls for the recognition of women's traditional and scientific knowledge to ensure equitable task distribution and ecosystem well-being.

The report argues that individual human rights frameworks are insufficient to protect Indigenous Peoples, Afrodescendants, and peasants facing systemic threats from corporate extraction and neoliberal globalisation. It defines 'territory' as any socially constructed space—including the human body—and calls for a shift toward recognizing collective rights to land, water, and self-determination to achieve transformative system change.

Friends of the Earth International argues that the neoliberal system drives ecological crises and fuels violence against marginalized communities. The organization advocates for a shift from individual human rights frameworks toward the recognition of collective 'rights of peoples' to protect land, water, and ancestral practices. It defines 'territory' as a socially constructed space—including the human body—and positions the defense of these territories and their defenders as a prerequisite for systemic transformation toward sustainable societies.

Friends of the Earth International argues that the neoliberal capitalist system drives multiple ecological and social crises, leading to the systemic violation of the collective rights of marginalized communities. The organization advocates for a shift from individual human rights frameworks to 'Rights of Peoples' to protect indigenous, Afro-descendant, and peasant communities. It defines 'territory' as a socially constructed space encompassing spiritual, cultural, and physical relationships, including the human body, and positions the defense of these territories and their defenders as essential for achieving a transformative system change toward sustainable societies.

The document examines the intersection of disruptive technologies and the 'total defence' concept, focusing on Norway. It argues that the rise of dual-use technologies and hybrid warfare necessitates a re-evaluation of civil-military relations and societal resilience. The authors introduce a framework consisting of temporality, performativity, and imagination to guide policy and operational adaptation. The report highlights lessons from the war in Ukraine, such as the role of commercial tech giants and the vulnerability of critical energy infrastructure, and recommends increased civil-military R&D and improved digital literacy to enhance national security.

The paper argues that public development banks lack a published approach to ensure that unearmarked loans provided for policy and institutional reforms—known as policy-based operations (PBOs)—are aligned with the Paris Agreement. It proposes that PBOs are Paris-aligned if they do not undermine a just transition to climate neutrality by increasing exposure to climate risks and, where possible, promote long-term macro-fiscal resilience.

The document identifies industrial heat as a significant contributor to global energy demand and proposes 'Heat as a Service' (HaaS) to address the high capital costs and low returns associated with sustainable heat solutions. Under HaaS, a third party invests in and operates low-carbon assets, selling the resulting energy via long-term agreements.

The document argues that the traditional separation of nature and culture limits how landscapes are managed and monitored, hindering the achievement of global biodiversity and well-being targets. It advocates for a multifunctional approach to reconcile social equity with environmental goals and improve adaptation to climate change.

The document examines the dimensions of a just energy transition, moving beyond the focus on fossil fuel workers to address the impacts of clean energy deployment. It identifies five types of energy justice—distributive, procedural, recognition, restorative, and cosmopolitan—and emphasizes the necessity of respecting human rights across the entire clean energy supply chain. The briefing highlights risks associated with critical mineral extraction and land use, providing case studies from Colombia and Scandinavia. It concludes that international cooperation and robust regulatory frameworks are essential to ensure that the benefits and costs of the transition are shared equitably without exacerbating existing inequalities.

The document examines the limitations of GDP as a measure of progress, noting that the pursuit of material gain leads to social inequity and environmental degradation. It identifies systemic roadblocks to redefining prosperity—including national reliance on GDP for revenue, cultural associations of success with consumption, and business models based on consumerism. The authors propose a suite of actions, such as the adoption of complementary well-being indicators, the potential introduction of wealth taxes to decouple growth from resource use, and a shift in corporate marketing to reshape societal values. Case studies from countries like Bhutan, Australia, and the UK illustrate various ways beyond-GDP indicators have been implemented.