Search Climate Insights Directory

The New York Declaration on Forests (NYDF) is a global political framework adopted in 2014 and refreshed in 2021. It aims to halt natural forest loss by 2030 and restore 350 million hectares of degraded landscapes. The declaration identifies the conversion of forests for agricultural commodities—specifically soy, palm oil, beef, and paper—as accounting for approximately half of global deforestation. The NYDF asserts that achieving its goals could provide over 7 billion tons (CO2e) of cost-effective climate change mitigation annually by 2030, emphasizing the necessity of centering Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities in these solutions.

The New York Declaration on Forests (NYDF) is a statement of commitment to end the loss and degradation of natural forests by 2030. It identifies the conversion of forests for agricultural commodities—specifically soy, palm oil, beef, and paper—as accounting for roughly half of global deforestation. The declaration sets goals to eliminate deforestation from agricultural production, reduce impacts from infrastructure and extractive industries, and restore 350 million hectares of landscapes and forestlands by 2030. It emphasizes the central role of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities in forest protection and aims to reduce emissions in alignment with the Paris Agreement's 1.5°C warming limit, potentially mitigating over 7 billion tons (CO2e) per year by 2030.

The New York Declaration on Forests establishes a global framework to reduce natural forest loss by half by 2020 and end it by 2030. It targets the elimination of deforestation in commodity production (soy, palm oil, beef, and paper) and sets ambitious restoration goals for degraded lands. The declaration emphasizes the role of forests in sequestering carbon, supporting 1.6 billion people, and protecting 80% of terrestrial biodiversity, estimating that achieving these goals could reduce annual emissions by 4.5 to 8.8 billion tonnes by 2030.

The FSD Africa Supplier and Grantee Code of Conduct mandates that all partners act with integrity, transparency, and value for money. It implements a two-tier compliance structure: Level 1 for contracts of £500,001 or more, requiring rigorous policies and annual declarations, and Level 2 for smaller contracts, focusing on overarching principles. Key requirements include adherence to environmental and net-zero policies, human rights protections, anti-money laundering laws, and the support of MSMEs within the delivery chain.

The guidelines establish that 'secondary cities' eligible for the SAP must have a population between 1 and 3 million. The GCF prioritizes integrated, cross-sectoral projects focusing on decarbonization of energy, building energy efficiency, mobility, urban form, climate adaptation, circular economy, waste management, and water/sanitation. To achieve a 'paradigm shift,' projects must move away from carbon-intensive urbanization through technological and institutional leapfrogging. The document specifies that construction of new housing, roads, or bus rapid transport systems are 'NON SAP-ABLE' due to environmental and social safeguard (ESS) standards. Impact measurement must be quantitative and aligned with the GCF's integrated results management framework, utilizing sex-disaggregated indicators where possible.

The document specifies the financial parameters for GCF grants and concessional loans for the public sector, detailing currency, interest rates, maturity, and grace periods based on the level of concessionality.

The document outlines the GCF's accreditation process, which is divided into three stages: no-objection and readiness, accreditation review and decision, and final arrangements. It defines the fiduciary standards (basic and specific) and environmental and social safeguards (ESS) that applicants must meet. The framework distinguishes between 'direct access' for national/regional entities and 'international access' for global organizations. It also details the roles of the GCF Board, Secretariat, Accreditation Committee, and Accreditation Panel in managing the process.

The GCF Initial Investment Framework establishes the rules and targets for the fund's first resource mobilization period. It defines a balanced portfolio approach between mitigation and adaptation, sets specific targets for vulnerable countries and the private sector, and provides a six-criterion framework for assessing project proposals.

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) has developed Performance Measurement Frameworks (PMFs) to quantify and qualify the impacts of its climate mitigation and adaptation investments. The frameworks utilize a combination of quantitative and qualitative indicators, including gender-disaggregated data, to track progress toward low-emission and climate-resilient development pathways. Mitigation metrics focus on CO2 equivalent reductions across energy, transport, buildings, and forestry, while adaptation metrics measure beneficiary reach, risk reduction, and the resilience of infrastructure and ecosystems.

The GCF Whistleblower Protection and Witness Policy outlines the mechanisms for reporting misconduct, the protections afforded to those who report in good faith, and the remedies available in cases of retaliation. It designates the Independent Integrity Unit (IIU) as the primary body for handling reports and investigations, while providing specific channels for reports against high-level officials via the Ethics and Audit Committee (EAC). The policy covers GCF staff, board members, and external counterparties, emphasizing confidentiality, anonymity, and a zero-tolerance approach to retaliation.

The document outlines the technical requirements and strategic approach for projects seeking funding through the Green Climate Fund's Simplified Approval Process (SAP) in the field of ecosystems and ecosystem services. It defines ecosystem services, explains the role of ecosystem-based adaptation (EbA) in climate resilience, and identifies 'natural capital accounting' as a primary driver for a paradigm shift in investment. The guide provides a framework for measuring impact, lists examples of eligible and ineligible activities, and emphasizes the need for integrated, multisectoral approaches to overcome institutional coordination failures.

The document outlines the GCF's strategy for decarbonizing the energy sector through renewable energy (RE) and energy efficiency, specifically detailing the criteria and activities eligible for the Simplified Approval Process (SAP). It emphasizes three main axes of intervention: large-scale low-carbon electricity deployment, expanding energy access in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), and implementing innovative climate mitigation solutions. The guide provides a framework for measuring impact using quantitative and qualitative indicators, lists specific eligible and ineligible activities—such as excluding large-scale solar plants and most hydropower due to high environmental and social risks—and presents three project scenarios involving solar water heaters, rural energy kits, and solar-powered agricultural systems.

The document outlines the role of forests in climate adaptation and mitigation, identifies strategic intervention areas such as forest restoration and 'zero-deforestation' supply chains, and defines the criteria for a 'paradigm shift' in land use. It provides a performance measurement framework with specific indicators for GCF-level impacts and project results, alongside a matrix of eligible and ineligible activities for the SAP.

The document outlines the criteria and technical guidelines for cities to access the Green Climate Fund's Simplified Approval Process (SAP). It defines eligible 'secondary cities' as those with populations between 1 and 3 million, emphasizing the need for integrated, cross-sectoral approaches to decarbonization and resilience. The guide details eligible sectors—including energy, building efficiency, mobility, urban planning, adaptation, circular economy, waste management, and water/sanitation—while explicitly excluding new construction projects for housing, roads, or rapid transit systems. It provides a framework for measuring impact using quantitative indicators and offers three project scenarios: LED street lighting, district cooling networks, and integrated waste management.

The guide outlines the GCF's strategy to increase renewable energy (RE) shares in national energy matrices to mitigate climate change. It defines three dimensions for emission reduction: large-scale low-carbon electricity, increasing access to clean energy in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), and implementing innovative mitigation solutions like energy storage. The document specifies which activities are eligible for the Simplified Approval Process (SAP)—such as micro-scale solar grids and rooftop solar—and which are excluded, such as large-scale solar parks and certain biomass projects. It also provides a performance measurement framework focusing on tCO2eq reductions, financing leverage, and co-benefits like improved health and reduced deforestation.

The document outlines the technical requirements and eligible sectors for urban projects seeking funding through the Green Climate Fund's Simplified Approval Process (SAP). It defines eligible 'secondary cities' as those with populations between 1 and 3 million inhabitants and identifies key sectors for intervention, including energy decarbonization, building efficiency, mobility, and waste management. The guide emphasizes a multisectoral, integrated approach to achieve a 'paradigm shift' away from carbon-intensive urbanization, providing specific indicators for measuring impact and examples of activities that do and do not qualify for the SAP.

The guide outlines the technical requirements for GCF projects focusing on ecosystems and ecosystem services under the Simplified Approval Process (SAP). It defines ecosystem services, explains the role of Ecosystem-based Adaptation (EbA) in enhancing climate resilience, and advocates for natural capital accounting to shift investment paradigms. The document provides a framework for measuring impact through specific indicators and offers a matrix of eligible and ineligible activities to ensure projects maintain low environmental and social risk.

The document outlines the technical requirements and strategic approach for GCF projects focusing on land use and forest resources via the Simplified Approval Process (SAP). It emphasizes the dual role of forests in climate adaptation and mitigation, highlighting the importance of carbon sequestration and ecosystem services. The guide identifies key intervention areas—including forest restoration, sustainable management of protected areas, deforestation-free supply chains, and REDD+—and provides a framework for measuring impact through specific quantitative and qualitative indicators. It argues for a 'paradigm shift' that decouples economic growth from forest consumption and encourages innovative private sector financing to overcome investment barriers in nature-based solutions.

The GCF Environmental and Social Policy defines a comprehensive framework for managing environmental and social risks across all GCF-financed activities. It mandates that accredited entities maintain an Environmental and Social Management System (ESMS) and adhere to a mitigation hierarchy to avoid, minimize, or compensate for adverse impacts. The policy introduces a risk-based categorization system (Categories A, B, and C for activities; I1, I2, and I3 for intermediaries) to determine the depth of required assessments and stakeholder engagement. Key protections are specified for indigenous peoples, including the requirement for free, prior and informed consent in applicable circumstances, as well as safeguards for human rights, gender equality, and biodiversity. The framework also establishes a three-tier grievance redress system operating at the GCF, accredited entity, and activity levels.

The GCF's Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Policy implements a risk-based approach to protect the fund's resources and reputation. It mandates counterparty due diligence, prohibits relationships with non-cooperative or sanctioned entities, and assigns oversight to the Independent Integrity Unit. The policy aligns with Financial Action Task Force (FATF) recommendations and requires the retention of due diligence records for at least five years.