Search Climate Insights Directory

The 'Manuel de formation sur l’EEI' is a comprehensive training tool developed by UNEP and partners to strengthen capacities in integrated environmental assessment (IEA). It defines IEA as a process to produce future-oriented policy information on interactions between the natural environment and human society. The manual is structured into two volumes: Volume 1 covers eight basic methodological modules (ranging from process design and impact strategies to scenario analysis and communication), and Volume 2 provides thematic modules, specifically focusing on Vulnerability and Impact Assessments for climate change adaptation (VIA). The training emphasizes a participatory, interactive approach and is supported by a digital platform and an e-learning version to facilitate global collaboration and continuous learning among practitioners.

The document outlines a modular training framework developed by UNEP and IISD to help practitioners conduct integrated environmental assessments. It describes eight core methodological modules—covering everything from process design and impact strategies to data monitoring and scenario analysis—and a thematic module focused on climate change vulnerability and adaptation. The manual emphasizes a collaborative, iterative process aimed at informing policy decisions and improving environmental governance at national and regional scales.

The document outlines the role of Technical Research Institutions (TRIs) in the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM), specifically in producing National Self-Assessment Reports (NSARs). It details the challenges of managing complex research under tight deadlines, the necessity of balancing technical accuracy with political sensitivities, and provides a comprehensive methodology for data collection, source vetting, and questionnaire adaptation. The guide emphasizes the importance of public participation and the strategic development of Action Plans to ensure that the APRM leads to measurable policy reform.

The document outlines a comprehensive framework for implementing climate citizens' assemblies, emphasizing deliberative democracy to generate public policy recommendations. It details a five-phase process—preparation, learning, reflection/deliberation, recommendation drafting, and decision-making—while providing specific guidance on independent governance, inclusive participant selection, and the use of digital facilitation tools. The guide is based on experiences from state-level and regional assemblies in Spain, including those in Barcelona, Mallorca, and Guipúzcoa.

The document outlines a comprehensive approach to implementing deliberative democracy for climate policy, detailing a five-phase process: preparation, learning, reflection, recommendation drafting, and decision-making. It emphasizes the need for independent governance, representative sampling, and inclusive accessibility measures to ensure high-quality, legitimate public policy recommendations.

The document outlines a comprehensive approach to deliberative democracy applied to the climate crisis. It details a five-phase process—preparation, learning, reflection, recommendation drafting, and decision-making—supported by independent governance structures. The guide emphasizes inclusivity, accessibility, and the use of both digital and physical tools to ensure a representative sample of citizens can produce legitimate policy recommendations for governments and social actors.

The document outlines a comprehensive approach to implementing climate citizens' assemblies as tools for deliberative democracy. It details a five-phase process—preparation, learning, reflection/deliberation, recommendation drafting, and decision-making—while emphasizing the need for independent governance, representative sampling, and inclusive accessibility. The guide provides specific technical tools for virtual and in-person facilitation and uses examples from assemblies in Spain, Barcelona, Mallorca, and Gipuzkoa to illustrate different scales of implementation.

The document outlines a comprehensive approach to implementing climate citizens' assemblies, emphasizing deliberative democracy to generate public policy recommendations. It details a five-phase process—preparation, learning, reflection/deliberation, recommendation drafting, and decision-making—while highlighting the importance of independent governance, inclusive participant selection, and the use of specific facilitation techniques to ensure balanced participation. The guide also provides practical tools for managing virtual and physical sessions, ensuring accessibility for diverse populations, and maintaining the anonymity of participants to protect the integrity of the deliberative process.

The guide establishes a four-stage methodology (planning, design, field, and analysis) for municipalities to collect reliable data on waste generation, density, and composition. It categorizes municipalities by population size and distinguishes between household and non-household generators. The framework was piloted in Cayambe and Puerto López, providing data on per capita generation and organic content to inform national sustainable waste management policies.

The document describes the Marginal Abatement Cost Curve (MACC) as a graphical tool that ranks greenhouse gas mitigation options by cost and abatement potential to support policy prioritization. It details a four-step construction process involving the calculation of abatement potential and marginal abatement cost (based on Net Present Value), and provides guidance on interpreting negative and positive costs to determine appropriate financing mechanisms. The text also warns that MACCs are static representations that ignore interactions between options, exclude societal co-benefits, and mask the distinction between upfront CAPEX and ongoing OPEX.

The document outlines a two-exercise process for selecting climate resilience interventions. First, interventions are scored based on five resilience indicators: redundancy, flexibility and diversity, re-organisation and responsiveness, access to documentation and learning, and energy saving/GHG mitigation potential. Second, high-scoring interventions are evaluated for feasibility (technical, political, social, cost-benefit, and responsibility) and impact (timeframe and overall effect), with a strong emphasis on gender equality and the empowerment of women and girls.

The document outlines a VfM framework for FSD programmes based on the 'Four Es' (economy, efficiency, effectiveness, and equity) plus cost-effectiveness. It moves beyond simple indicators to use a combination of quantitative data and qualitative narratives to make judged assessments of performance against predefined standards. The guide integrates with Impact-Oriented Measurement (IOM) and a Compendium of Indicators to help FSDs communicate their performance story and improve resource management.

The document outlines a framework for analyzing payments made by oil, gas, and mining companies to governments. It details ten specific tests—ranging from simple checks of payment types to complex revenue forecast comparisons—designed to identify 'red flags' or discrepancies that may indicate revenue loss due to bad deals, tax avoidance, or lack of enforcement. The guide emphasizes the use of supplementary data, such as fiscal terms and international commodity prices, to verify the accuracy of company disclosures.

The document defines Agent-Based Modeling (ABM) as a 'bottom-up' technique where a system is represented as a collection of autonomous decision-making entities called agents. Unlike traditional analytical methods that focus on system equilibrium, ABMs allow for the emergence of global patterns from local interactions. The guide details the components of an ABM—agents, environment, and rules—and highlights its utility in simulating complex systems characterized by interdependence, heterogeneity, and hierarchies. It provides specific guidance on when to use ABMs (e.g., for non-linear interactions or spatial relevance) and outlines a rigorous process for verification, calibration, and validation. Finally, it discusses implementation tools and the ODD protocol for standardized documentation.

The document outlines a five-step participatory scenario development (PSD) process designed to integrate local stakeholder knowledge with scientific climate projections to create plausible future development pathways. It argues that the most effective PSD brings together 'expert' and stakeholder knowledge to balance biophysical risks with social issues. A case study in Lake Balaton, Hungary, illustrates the process, where 80 participants identified key economic factors—such as tourism and agriculture—and developed adaptation strategies including rainwater storage and the use of native crop varieties. The guide concludes that PSD helps identify development priorities that simultaneously increase adaptive capacity, though it notes the challenge of linking quantitative climate data with qualitative scenarios.

The Integrated Environmental Assessment Training Manual provides a framework for conducting comprehensive environmental assessments to support sustainable development. It emphasizes the use of the DPSIR (Driving forces, Pressures, State, Impact, Response) framework to analyze the interactions between human activities and the environment. The manual outlines the process of selecting indicators, analyzing data, and reporting findings to inform policy decisions, specifically highlighting the role of the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) in capacity building for these assessments.

The 'Disinformation Starter Kit' by the Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD) is a practical toolkit designed for civil society groups to track online disinformation. It outlines a four-stage process: preparation (defining strategy), data collection (using keywords and actor lists), spotting false information (refining recall and precision), and spotting false behaviour (identifying platform manipulation). The guide emphasizes that while automated tools can assist, analysts should rely on impressionistic appraisal of profiles, posts, and points of view to identify 'inorganic' behaviour. It also provides a directory of open-source tools for investigating domain ownership and website content, while cautioning against the undue amplification of disinformation during reporting.

The document outlines a multi-step process for creating biocultural community protocols, starting with an assessment of appropriateness and moving through the 'mapping' of community identity, natural foundations, sociocultural aspects, economic principles, and political and legal frameworks. It emphasizes community-led decision-making, the protection of sensitive traditional knowledge, and the strategic consolidation of findings into a format that communicates clear messages to external decision-makers to achieve legal and political goals.

The document outlines a three-part process for managing biocultural community protocols: intrinsic analysis of community changes, extrinsic analysis of interactions with external actors, and the subsequent evaluation and revision of the protocol itself. It emphasizes participatory methods, such as the 'Most Significant Change' technique, to capture qualitative impacts on community wellbeing and gender roles. The guide also stresses the importance of keeping both internal community members and external stakeholders informed through diverse communication tools to maintain transparency and trust.

The document outlines a framework for the ongoing management of biocultural community protocols, focusing on 'Looking Inwards' to assess community changes, 'Looking Outwards' to evaluate external partnerships, and 'Revisiting and Revising' the protocol as a living instrument. It emphasizes qualitative tools like 'Most Significant Change' stories and participatory methods to measure wellbeing and impact.