Search Climate Insights Directory

The document examines the peace process in Myanmar from the perspectives of the government, the Army, non-state armed groups (NSAGs), and civil society. It identifies the current reform period under President Thein Sein as a critical window of opportunity but warns that the process is fragile due to a lack of trust in the Myanmar Army and the continuation of conflict in northern regions. The author argues for a 'deepening' of the process to include conflict-affected communities and a 'broadening' to address structural political issues rather than just security ceasefires. The paper concludes by proposing a 'framework agreement' to facilitate multilateral discussions on constitutional reform, land rights, and resource management.

The research analyzes street harassment in Cairo as a social phenomenon linked to structural and institutional changes in Egypt. It argues that the inability of men to fulfill traditional roles as economic providers, exacerbated by high unemployment and economic instability since the 1970s, leads them to symbolically reclaim their masculinity through the harassment of women in public spaces. The paper defines street harassment across three categories—gestures, verbal remarks, and physical harassment—and notes a rise in 'mob-related' incidents since 2005. It concludes that legal criminalization alone is unlikely to solve the problem without addressing the underlying socioeconomic frustrations and the crisis of masculinity.

The report analyzes how Egypt and Uganda navigate their relationships with Northern and Southern Sudan ahead of the 2011 referendum. Egypt faces waning regional influence and security dilemmas related to the Nile and border stability, while Uganda maintains a strong strategic and economic partnership with the Southern Sudanese leadership to ensure regional stability and expand trade.

The document analyzes the UK's engagement in Afghanistan, arguing that an ideological commitment to liberal internationalism led to an over-ambitious 'comprehensive approach' that struggled against local realities. It details the transition from soft stabilization in the north to intense combat in Helmand, where strategic errors—such as the 'platoon house strategy' and the removal of a powerful local governor—intensified the insurgency. The paper concludes that the UK responded to these failures through 'mission creep,' escalating troop levels and expanding objectives without achieving decisive results.

The research examines the Central Asia Regional Security Complex (CA RSC), comprising Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. It argues that while these states share concerns regarding trans-border terrorism, extremism, and narcotics trafficking from Afghanistan, their primary security drivers are internal rivalries and the strategic balancing of global powers—specifically Russia, China, and the USA. The author contends that the 'Heart of Asia' concept fails because it underestimates inter-state non-cooperation and ignores the distinct security dynamics of sub-regions. Central Asian states employ a 'multi-vector' foreign policy to maximize benefits from competing external interests while guarding their sovereignty. Consequently, their engagement with Afghanistan is fragmented and unilateral, focused on extracting economic rent or preventing security 'bleed-out' rather than a unified regional strategy.

The author advocates for treating gun violence as a public health issue rather than a purely legal or security matter, particularly in Africa. The text explains that firearms act as 'violence multipliers' that increase the lethality of both premeditated and impulsive violence. It identifies critical gaps in mortality and possession data across sub-Saharan Africa and outlines how WHO recommendations and international agreements—such as the UN Programme of Action and regional protocols in West, East, and Southern Africa—can be leveraged by public health professionals to secure funding and government cooperation.

The paper argues that Turkey's foreign policy in Syria is primarily driven by domestic considerations under the AKP's illiberal populist governance. Key internal drivers include the presence of 3.7 million Syrian refugees, economic downturn, and the 're-securitization' of the Kurdish issue, which has pushed the government toward a nationalist alliance with the MHP. This domestic shift has fueled anti-Westernism, straining relations with the US over Kurdish partnerships and the S-400 missile purchase, and with the EU over refugee management and Mediterranean hydrocarbon disputes. Consequently, Turkey has entered a transactional 'partnership of convenience' with Russia, though this relationship faces sustainability challenges due to conflicting goals in Idlib, Syria.

The document critically examines the 'turn towards technology' in humanitarian aid, specifically regarding sexual violence. It warns that technological solutions often fail due to inadequate problem definitions and the exclusion of affected populations. The author identifies four key areas of concern: the creation of 'digital bodies' (data representations of physical people), the use of intrusive wearables for reproductive and health tracking, the 'technologization' of safeguarding through quantification and criminal law, and the use of data-driven vulnerability assessments that may render male victims invisible. Finally, it cautions against 'humanitarian experimentation,' where untested technologies are deployed in fragile environments without sufficient ethical frameworks, potentially introducing new harms to victims of gender-based violence.

The 2008 Mumbai attacks were not only physical acts of violence but a 'staged' spectacle designed for maximum media visibility. The author argues that the 'truth' of the attacks was creatively reconstructed through media scripting, political opportunism by parties like the BJP, and the subsequent creation of new security agencies. The paper highlights a trend where counter-terrorism tools, such as the National Investigation Agency (NIA), are repurposed for counter-insurgency in India's frontier regions, potentially extending a 'state of exception' into domestic spaces.

The document examines the 'capitalist peace' thesis, which argues that capitalism—through free trade, investment, and property rights—reduces the likelihood of interstate conflict. It contrasts this with the 'democratic peace' and 'Kantian peace' frameworks, noting that while some scholars argue capitalism is the primary driver of peace, others see it as supplementary to democracy. The authors identify critical gaps in the current literature, specifically the lack of precise micro-foundations linking market attributes to peace and the difficulty in empirically distinguishing capitalist peace from commercial liberalism.

The document provides a historical overview of Western philosophical approaches to war. It details the transition from ancient 'realist' and 'pacific' orientations to the medieval systematization of Just War Theory by figures like Augustine and Aquinas. It further examines the 'Perpetual Peace Theory' developed by Hobbes, Rousseau, and Kant, which sought structural institutional solutions to conflict. Finally, it notes the late 20th-century revival of Just War Theory, sparked by the Vietnam War and the work of Michael Walzer, leading to modern discussions on humanitarian intervention and 'jus post bellum'.

The document provides a comprehensive review of modern Just War theory, analyzing the criteria for entering war (jus ad bellum), conducting war (jus in bello), and ending war (jus post bellum). It highlights key tensions, such as the debate over humanitarian intervention, the morality of preventive war, and the 'moral equality of soldiers'—the question of whether combatants fighting an unjust war can still act justly in their conduct.

The research examines Norwegian humanitarian aid in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, specifically in health and education. It finds that while NGOs implement RBA principles at a project level, the approach fails to address root causes because the primary duty-bearer, Israel, is hostile to these goals and the donor state, Norway, prioritizes foreign policy and diplomatic relations over a forceful rights-based agenda. This results in aid that provides temporary relief but may inadvertently facilitate the occupation by relieving Israel of its legal responsibilities.

The author critiques the 2016 Arbitral Tribunal's interpretation of Article 121(3) of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which determined that high-tide features in the Spratly Islands are 'rocks' incapable of sustaining human habitation or economic life and thus cannot generate an Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) or continental shelf. The author contends that the Tribunal overlooked significant State practice where countries like Australia, France, Japan, New Zealand, and the United States claim 200-nm EEZs for similarly remote, uninhabited features. The paper suggests that if the Tribunal had comprehensively examined these practices and bilateral agreements, it might have reached a different conclusion. Furthermore, it highlights a 'double standard' where these five nations urge China and the Philippines to abide by the Award while continuing their own inconsistent claims.

The research examines the link between conflict-related violence and intimate-partner violence (IPV) in Peru using a sample of 25,093 married women and data from the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. The authors find that local exposure to wartime violence significantly increases the risk of IPV, with the effect being most pronounced for conflict-related sexual violence. While other factors like partner alcohol abuse and childhood history of family violence are stronger predictors, the legacy of war remains a statistically significant determinant. The study suggests that public health screening tools in post-conflict settings should include modules on wartime exposure to better identify at-risk populations.

The research paper examines the failure of the first version of Norway's 'Smittestopp' app, which was launched in April 2020 and cancelled in September 2020. The author argues that the app's failure highlights a tension between 'technological utopianism' and the rule of law, specifically regarding data protection and privacy. The document details how the app was criticized by the Norwegian Data Protection Authority (DPA) and the tech community for being 'disproportionately intrusive' and 'experimental'. It further analyzes the government's response to this failure, noting a tendency to blame 'Big Tech' (Google and Apple) and a lack of humility in accepting legal criticisms. The author concludes that the Smittestopp saga demonstrates the rising political importance of GDPR compliance and the critical role of private-sector tech activists in providing democratic oversight when traditional civil society organizations remain silent.

The analysis explores the experiences of 'peripheral' doctoral students in a UK-based professional doctorate programme, focusing on the tensions between their professional expertise and their novice status in academia. It identifies four primary categories of challenges: the struggle for belonging and social isolation, complexities in supervisory relationships, identity and language dissonance, and the psychological impact of 'impostor syndrome'. The authors argue that while distance programmes provide necessary flexibility, they often create a disconnect with the broader university infrastructure. The study highlights the value of the 'cohort model' in building social capital and suggests that institutional support, such as cross-cultural training and flexible enrolment options, is essential for the success of non-traditional students.

The research examines the interaction effects of business-development partnerships in the Global South, arguing that the current global model often prioritizes corporate interests and high-level rhetoric over grounded social impact. Through narrative inquiry and case studies in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Myanmar, and Dubai, the author illustrates how corporate operations can inadvertently fund conflict, confer legitimacy to violent actors, and facilitate the laundering of conflict minerals, despite public commitments to the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The paper concludes that non-binding, self-reported frameworks like the UN Global Compact are insufficient and that binding, independently verified regulatory initiatives are necessary to ensure peace-positive business action.

The document examines how ethno-national diasporas influence civil wars through financial contributions, military and political involvement, and international advocacy. It analyzes the dual nature of this influence, noting that while diaspora resources can prolong conflict by sustaining armed groups and hardening political stances, they also offer significant potential for peace through post-conflict reconstruction, the provision of skilled personnel for new institutions, and the promotion of human rights discourses.

The document argues that Australia's mandatory off-shore processing regime in Nauru and Papua New Guinea constitutes a violation of the principle of non-refoulement. It contends that by transferring asylum seekers to facilities characterized by arbitrary detention, inadequate medical care, and conditions akin to torture, Australia exercises extraterritorial jurisdiction and remains legally responsible for these human rights violations. The author warns that this model serves as a blueprint for similar externalization policies currently emerging in the European Union.