Search Climate Insights Directory

The document defines Vertical Integration as the strategic linking of national and sub-national efforts in climate adaptation. It emphasizes that this process ensures adaptation considerations are integrated across all levels of government and society, leveraging local expertise to support vulnerable groups. The text identifies institutional frameworks, information sharing, and capacity development as the three key drivers of this integration. It further explains that while decentralization provides a strong foundation for Vertical Integration by shifting decision-making closer to citizens, countries with less advanced decentralization must find alternative ways to engage sub-national actors.

The document advocates for a coordinated Caribbean approach to monitoring and evaluating National Adaptation Plans (NAPs), emphasizing the need for indicators that serve national interests rather than just donor requirements. Key recommendations include adopting a 'big picture' approach via national adaptation road maps, creating a pool of regional indicators, leveraging existing frameworks like the CIF-PPCR, and establishing M&E indicators at the start of the process to allow for incremental improvements.

The document outlines a framework for financing National Adaptation Plan (NAP) processes, distinguishing between the development phase (planning and coordination) and the implementation phase (execution of adaptation actions). It identifies domestic public revenues, bilateral providers, multilateral funds, and private sector actors as key funding sources. The guide emphasizes the need for a dedicated financing strategy to bridge funding gaps and align national priorities with available financial instruments, while highlighting the critical role of senior-level political commitment and the integration of adaptation costs into national budgeting cycles.

The document outlines a comprehensive framework for financing National Adaptation Plan (NAP) processes, distinguishing between the lower-cost 'development phase' (planning and coordination) and the high-cost 'implementation phase' (execution of adaptation actions). It identifies four primary funding streams: national public finance (budgets, fiscal instruments, and national climate funds), bilateral providers (grants and technical assistance), multilateral funds (such as the Green Climate Fund and Adaptation Fund), and the private sector (through direct investment and public-private partnerships). The guide emphasizes the necessity of a tailored financing strategy that identifies funding gaps, determines appropriate financial instruments, and establishes operational steps to align national adaptation priorities with available resources.

The document outlines a strategic framework for financing National Adaptation Plan (NAP) processes, distinguishing between the 'elaboration phase' (planning and coordination) and the 'execution phase' (implementation of priority measures). It identifies four primary funding streams: domestic public revenues, bilateral providers, multilateral funds, and the private sector. While elaboration is typically funded by public and bilateral grants, the more costly execution phase requires a diversified mix of public and private capital. The brief recommends that countries develop a dedicated NAP financing strategy that identifies funding gaps, determines appropriate financial instruments, and defines operational steps to improve access to resources.

The document outlines how developing countries can utilize domestic public funds to ensure predictable resources for climate adaptation. It emphasizes integrating adaptation into national planning and budgeting cycles, using fiscal tools like taxes and green bonds to generate revenue, and implementing tracking systems to monitor adaptation spending and demonstrate national ownership.

null

The document outlines how developing countries can utilize domestic public funds to implement National Adaptation Plans (NAPs). It emphasizes integrating adaptation into national budget cycles, using fiscal tools like taxes and green bonds to raise revenue, and implementing monitoring systems to track adaptation spending. Examples include Togo's budgeting manual, the Philippines' local adaptation fund, and Indonesia's fossil fuel subsidy reform.

The document outlines how developing countries can integrate climate adaptation into national budgeting and use domestic fiscal tools to fund resilience. It highlights the importance of coordinating between climate-sensitive sectors and finance ministries, using instruments like fuel taxes and green bonds, and implementing tracking systems to demonstrate country ownership and identify funding gaps.

The NAP Global Network provides resources, policy analysis, and coordination platforms to help bilateral donors align their investments with the adaptation priorities of developing countries. The Network aims to reduce duplication of efforts and increase the effectiveness of official development assistance for climate adaptation, offering services such as 'NAP Assemblies' for joint implementation and peer learning workshops. A practical example of this coordination is cited in Cambodia, where USAID and GIZ collaborated to support the Ministry of Environment's NAP process.

The NAP Global Network provides a framework for developing countries to accelerate national adaptation planning (NAP) through peer learning, technical support, and donor coordination. The Network facilitates Targeted Topics Forums (TTFs) and South-South exchanges to share best practices on issues such as financing and sectoral integration. It also operates a Country Support Hub for expert advice and works to align bilateral donor investments with national priorities to avoid duplication of efforts.

Grenada has adopted a 'sector-driven' approach to climate adaptation, where individual sectors had already begun integrating adaptation measures before a national coordinating framework was established. The government is now using the National Adaptation Plan (NAP) process to stocktake these efforts, identify gaps, and 'climate-proof' its national development planning. Coordination is led by the Ministry of Agriculture, Lands, Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment (MALFFE) and the National Climate Change Committee (NCCC), with a focus on improving climate finance readiness to access the Green Climate Fund.

The guidebook offers a structured approach to developing national adaptation monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems, emphasizing that there is no universal model and that systems must be tailored to a country's specific context. It guides users through four building blocks: understanding the context, identifying monitoring content, designing operational processes, and determining how to present results.

The document argues that the institutional architecture developed under the UNFCCC for National Adaptation Programmes of Action (NAPAs) and National Adaptation Plans (NAPs) provides a ready-made foundation for achieving the global adaptation goal of the Paris Agreement and SDG target 13.1. It highlights that while developing countries, especially Least Developed Countries (LDCs), have led in strategic adaptation planning, developed countries can now leverage these best practices. Furthermore, the brief suggests that the support mechanisms used for NAPs—such as technical guidelines, the NAP-Global Support Programme, and NAP Central—could be replicated to help developing countries craft the mitigation and adaptation components of their NDCs.

The Philippines employs a nationally driven approach to climate adaptation, centered on the Climate Change Commission (CCC) and the National Climate Change Action Plan (NCCAP) 20112028. The CCC coordinates across national agencies, local government units, and the National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA) to align climate priorities with the Philippine Development Plan. Local implementation is supported by the Peoples Survival Fund, while international donor coordination is managed through the Philippines Development Forum and NEDA's public investment program.

Jamaica employs a hybrid approach to climate adaptation, combining national-level mandates from Vision 2030 and the 2015 Climate Change Policy Framework with sector-specific strategy development. Coordination is managed through the Planning Institute of Jamaica (PIOJ) and the Ministry of Water, Land, Environment and Climate Change (MWLECC), supported by a network of 27 focal points across government agencies. Sectoral integration varies, with some sectors creating stand-alone plans and others updating existing strategies, all intended to eventually merge into a national adaptation strategy and action plan.

The document defines vertical integration in the NAP process as the creation of intentional linkages between national and sub-national adaptation efforts to ensure local realities inform national plans and that NAPs enable local action. It identifies three core enabling factors: institutional arrangements, information sharing, and capacity development. The guide details how to integrate sub-national perspectives into planning, coordinate the implementation of adaptation options, and link M&E systems to capture local lessons. It emphasizes the importance of gender sensitivity, the inclusion of indigenous peoples and vulnerable groups, and the leveraging of existing decentralization processes and local funding mechanisms.

The document outlines a flexible approach to vertical integration in National Adaptation Plans (NAPs), emphasizing the need to link national strategies with local realities. It identifies three core enabling factors—institutional arrangements, information exchange, and capacity development—that support the iterative cycle of planning, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation (M&E). The guide provides specific questions and strategies to ensure sub-national diversity, gender sensitivity, and the inclusion of vulnerable groups are reflected in national policies, while ensuring national plans are actionable at the local level. It includes case studies from Colombia, Nepal, and Morocco to illustrate practical applications of these principles.

The document defines vertical integration in the context of National Adaptation Plans (NAPs) as a continuous effort to ensure local realities are reflected in national plans and that national plans enable subnational adaptation. It outlines a flexible, iterative approach centered on three enabling factors: institutional arrangements, information sharing, and capacity building. The guide provides specific strategies for integrating subnational perspectives into planning, coordinating implementation and resource allocation, and establishing linked M&E systems to ensure a bidirectional flow of learning between national and local actors.

The assembly brought together approximately 55 representatives from ministries, donors, and civil society to discuss the PNACC, which was slated for finalization in early 2017. The event focused on transitioning from sector-specific to multi-sectoral climate approaches and mapping current and future activities of technical and financial partners (PTFs) across six priority vulnerable sectors: energy, agriculture, human settlements and health, water resources, coastal erosion, and land use/forestry. Participants agreed on the need to finalize activity mapping to revise the PNACC budget and ensure its integration into the National Development Plan (2018-2022).