Working towards Caribbean regional approach monitoring evaluating NAPs

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The document advocates for a coordinated Caribbean approach to monitoring and evaluating National Adaptation Plans (NAPs), emphasizing the need for indicators that serve national interests rather than just donor requirements. Key recommendations include adopting a 'big picture' approach via national adaptation road maps, creating a pool of regional indicators, leveraging existing frameworks like the CIF-PPCR, and establishing M&E indicators at the start of the process to allow for incremental improvements.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • A 'big picture' approach is recommended, where a national adaptation road map for the NAP incorporates all priority sectors to avoid a 'disjointed, piecemeal approach' and allow for organized implementation as funding becomes available.
  • Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) should be designed to inform progress toward climate resilience and national interests rather than being treated as a formality to meet donor expectations.
  • The development of a pool of regional-level indicators that countries can adapt for national use is beneficial; this aligns with the Caribbean Community Climate Change Centre’s 2011-21 report which calls for transparent and simple M&E data relevant to regional and national challenges.
  • To manage capacity constraints, countries should build on existing M&E frameworks, such as the Climate Investment Funds’ Pilot Program for Climate Resilience (CIF-PPCR), instead of creating new reporting burdens from scratch.
  • M&E indicators must be developed early in the process to enable ongoing monitoring and the ability to adjust to emerging issues, as evaluation at the end of a project prevents incremental improvements over time.

Cite the original document

APA
noauthor (2017). Working towards Caribbean regional approach monitoring evaluating NAPs. NAP Global Network. https://napglobalnetwork.org/2017/01/working-towards-caribbean-regional-approach-monitoring-evaluating-naps/
Chicago
noauthor. Working towards Caribbean regional approach monitoring evaluating NAPs. NAP Global Network, 2017. https://napglobalnetwork.org/2017/01/working-towards-caribbean-regional-approach-monitoring-evaluating-naps/.
Wikipedia
{{cite press release |last1=noauthor |title=Working towards Caribbean regional approach monitoring evaluating NAPs |publisher=NAP Global Network |date=20 January 2017 |url=https://napglobalnetwork.org/2017/01/working-towards-caribbean-regional-approach-monitoring-evaluating-naps/ |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@misc{noauthor2017working, author = {noauthor}, title = {{Working towards Caribbean regional approach monitoring evaluating NAPs}}, publisher = {NAP Global Network}, year = {2017}, month = jan, url = {https://napglobalnetwork.org/2017/01/working-towards-caribbean-regional-approach-monitoring-evaluating-naps/}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated