Search Climate Insights Directory

The document outlines the IAI's framework for managing the suspension and cancellation of project funding. It defines suspension as a temporary halt and cancellation as a permanent withdrawal of support. Funding can be terminated due to non-compliance with terms, mutual agreement, or scientific misconduct. The guide details the notification process, a 30-day window for corrective action, and a formal appeals process managed by the Executive Council. It also defines scientific misconduct as including fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism, placing the primary responsibility for detecting such ethics violations on the grant recipients (concessionaires).

The document outlines the increasing likelihood of exceeding the 1.5°C warming threshold and the resulting interest in 'emergency' options like solar radiation modification (SRM) and carbon dioxide removal (CDR). It highlights a critical lack of formal international and national governance for SRM, noting a specific instance in Mexico where a private US company conducted unauthorized aerosol experiments. The text details efforts by IAI, CEPAL, and C2G to raise awareness and build regional governance frameworks in Latin America and the Caribbean to manage these climate interventions.

The report identifies 37 unique software tools for climate-sensitive infectious disease modelling, finding a heavy bias toward vector-borne diseases, particularly malaria. It highlights significant gaps in operationalization, accessibility, and geographic representation, noting that most tools are developed by North American and European institutions despite being intended for use in the Global South. Expert interviews reveal critical barriers to implementation, including poor data sharing between climate and health sectors, lack of political mandates, and a mismatch between complex model outputs and the needs of public health decision-makers.

The report evaluates the financial standing of the IAI, noting a shift from deficits to surpluses in recent estimates due to a 'principio de prudencia' (principle of prudence). For the 1998-1999 period, the financial result improved from a deficit of U$S 712 to a positive balance of U$S 21,475. For the 1999-2000 period, the most optimistic estimate projects a surplus of U$S 36,375, while the most pessimistic projects a deficit of U$S 83,625. These improvements are primarily attributed to a 'sustancial abatimiento' (substantial reduction) in personnel salaries and benefits, specifically for the Director and Scientific Officer, as well as reductions in travel expenses.

The GS/OAS and IAI have agreed to a five-year cooperation framework to enhance the role of science in policy-making and sustainable development across the Americas. The agreement outlines mutual commitments to support science diplomacy, capacity building for young scientists, and the exchange of research outcomes to inform decision-making. While the MoU provides a programmatic and juridical framework, it does not create immediate financial obligations; specific projects will require separate supplementary agreements detailing budgets and resources. Coordination is managed by the OAS Department of Sustainable Development and the IAI Directorate, with a Joint Steering Committee overseeing implementation.

The document outlines a formal partnership between Argentina's CONICET and the IAI to enhance scientific research on global change through joint funding, the exchange of information, and the development of research networks. A specific annex focuses on supporting Argentine scientists within the Collaborative Research Networks (CRN3) program, detailing financial contributions and selection processes for projects of regional importance.

The document outlines a partnership between REDE CLIMA and the IAI to support the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development through joint scientific agendas, capacity-building, and the strengthening of north-south engagement on sustainability science in the Americas.

The Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI), in partnership with The Alliance for Just Deliberation on Solar Geoengineering (DSG) and The Degrees Initiative, is launching a workshop series for policymakers in the Americas. The program focuses on solar radiation modification (SRM), specifically stratospheric aerosol injection and marine cloud brightening, to address the knowledge gap between the Global North and South. The workshops aim to equip regional actors with the tools to develop national positions and engage in international forums like the UNEA and UNFCCC CoP, emphasizing climate justice, ethical governance, and the potential regional impacts of climate interventions.

The document outlines the formation of the Indigenous Peoples Advisory Committee (IPAC) to integrate Indigenous knowledge and science into the IAI's scientific agenda on Global Environmental Change (GEC). It specifies that the committee will consist of five members from IAI member countries, emphasizing equitable representation of women and youth. The IPAC is designed to provide recommendations on the IAI's Strategic Plan and scientific agenda, working alongside the Scientific Advisory Committee (SAC) and Science-Policy Advisory Committee (SPAC). The text also details the candidate requirements, nomination process, and the IAI's broader Gender, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) policy.

The policy brief highlights the risks of improper nitrogen use in Latin American agriculture and wastewater management, advocating for evidence-based policies to prevent soil degradation and water contamination. It details a research project by the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) and the National Institute for Space Research (INPE) to monitor nitrogen cycles and develop management tools across several American countries.

The Standing Rules of the Scientific Advisory Committee (SAC) define the governance and operational framework for the committee. The SAC consists of ten members and up to three alternates elected by the Conference of the Parties from nominations by Parties, the SAC itself, and Institute Associates. The committee is tasked with recommending scientific agendas, directing peer reviews, and assessing scientific results. It meets at least annually and holds monthly joint meetings with the Science-Policy Advisory Committee. Leadership consists of a Chair and Vice-Chair elected for two-year terms, with a quorum requiring an absolute majority of members.

The regulations define the Scientific Advisory Committee (SAC) as a ten-member body elected by the Conference of the Parties. The SAC is responsible for recommending scientific agendas, managing peer review, and evaluating the Institute's scientific results. The rules detail the nomination process, meeting frequencies, and the internal governance of the committee, including the election of its President and Vice President.

The #SeAdapta project investigates the adaptive capacity of small-scale fisheries in Latin America, specifically focusing on Yellow Clam, Spiny Lobster, and Sea Cucumber. In Uruguay, the project emphasizes the value of combining conventional science with local ecological knowledge. In Argentina, research on yellow and wedge clams shows that shell properties and population abundance are negatively impacted by El Niño and low-salinity waters. In the Galapagos Islands, the project found that while the seafood system is vulnerable to global shocks like COVID-19, small-scale fisheries are critical for food security, leading to recommendations for systemic transformation through local consumption, entrepreneurial support, technology against illegal fishing, and circular economy practices.

The GovernAgua project analyzed six watersheds in Argentina, Brazil, and Uruguay to understand the drivers of water crises and the effectiveness of basin committees. Findings indicate that while crises often improve biophysical monitoring, responses remain largely reactive. The project advocates for inter-institutional cooperation, transdisciplinary practices, and stronger science-policy-society dialogue to build anticipatory governance capacities.

The project addresses the lack of empirical research on the links between social and ecological resilience in heterogeneous territories facing rapid environmental change. By conducting multi-stakeholder workshops in Argentina, Brazil, and Colombia, the project co-designed research questions with participants ranging from civil society to national government. Parallel conceptual work includes a literature review of resilience definitions and the creation of a comparative territory baseline using economic, social, and geographical variables for the four study regions.

The project 'Improving the governance of the floodplain in over-built river basins' investigates the ecological impacts of hydropower plants on the Paraná river in Brazil. Using computer modeling and the Indicators of Hydrological Alteration (IHA) method, researchers identified that fish migration and reproduction are strongly influenced by the duration, starting date, peak, and frequency of flood events. The study also highlights the dependence of local socio-economic activities, including professional fishing, tourism, and recreation, on these fish ecosystems. To resolve conflicts between energy production and environmental needs, the team simulated the performance of 53 hydropower plants using Stochastic Dual Dynamic Programming (SDDP) to develop reservoir operational policies that meet both hydropower and ecosystem service demands.

The provided text is a directory of institutions involved in a project titled "Impactos del cambio climático en la biodiversidad de los Andes tropicales". It identifies the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) as the coordinating body and lists funding sources such as the MacArthur Foundation and the National Science Foundation. The document details various partner and collaborating organizations across Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Canada, and the United States, including universities, botanical gardens, and meteorological services, all contributing to research on climate change impacts and biodiversity conservation in the tropical Andes region.

The document details the interim governance and financial arrangements for the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) during its transition period. It specifies the roles of the Conference of the Parties (CoP), the Executive Council (EC), and the Scientific Advisory Committee (SAC), while outlining the temporary responsibilities of the Director pro tempore. Key focus areas include the selection process for the permanent Director, the establishment of financial policies by Deloitte and Touche, and the management of core and program funds through the US National Science Foundation until a formal IAI account is created. The plan aims for the IAI to be fully operational by autumn 1995, including the signing of a Host Country Agreement with Brazil.

The IAI's STeP Fellowship Program aims to strengthen the science-policy-diplomacy interface in Latin America and the Caribbean by training early-career scientists in communication, leadership, and science diplomacy. Between July 2020 and June 2021, the program conducted 20 virtual training sessions and established cohorts in Mexico and Argentina focusing on sustainable cities and agriculture. The program collaborates with international partners such as AAAS and Mitacs Canada, with fellows working on regional priorities including clean energy, circular economy, and climate-fragile polar regions. Expansion efforts are targeting new cohorts in biodiversity, climate change, and natural disaster risk mitigation, alongside specific institutional negotiations in Chile and Peru.

The STeP Fellowship program (2020-2024) aims to bridge the gap between science and policy in Latin America and the Caribbean by embedding scientists within public or private host organizations. The program provides a two-year professional development curriculum focused on leadership, communication, and science diplomacy, while establishing an inter-American network to share best practices in evidence-based policy for global change and sustainable development.