Search Climate Insights Directory

Minutes from the SABS SC146A meeting on 3 September 2008, detailing delays by DEAT in providing standard specifications for old and new plants, discussions on compliance periods under the NAF, and progress updates from four technical Working Groups.

A letter from the South African Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism to the SABS Standards Division providing directions on the differentiation of new and existing facilities and compliance timeframes for draft minimum emission standards for listed activities.

This document is a submission by Synfuels regarding proposed emission standards for combustion installations. The author provides feedback on particulate matter, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen oxide limits for both existing and new facilities, arguing for alignment with international standards and consideration of local resource constraints.

This coordinator's report documents a meeting held on 18 November 2008 at the Eskom Research Centre regarding the SABS SC 146 A Quality Standard for Source Emissions. The meeting involved discussions between the Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (DEAT), industry representatives (including Eskom, Sasol, and the RMEF), and the Legal Resources Centre (LRC) to negotiate minimum emission standards for various industrial installations, including solid/liquid fuel combustion, petroleum industry processes, and carbonisation/coking plants.

The document contains the minutes of the SABS SC 146A Source Emissions meeting held on 5 November 2008 in Pretoria. The meeting focused on reviewing proposed minimum emission standards for South Africa, coordinating the work of various Working Groups (WGs), and addressing technical disagreements regarding emission limits and plant definitions.

A letter from the South African Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism to SABS TC146 members regarding delays in identifying listed activities and minimum emission standards under theS the National Environmental Management: Air Quality Act (Act No. 39 of 2004).

Minutes from a meeting of the SABS SC 146A Source Emissions committee held on 10 March 2009 in Pretoria. The meeting focused on resolving and identifying unresolved emission standards for various industrial processes, including incineration, hazardous air pollutants, and particulate matter (PM), with several disputed items slated for elevation to the Technical Committee (TC).

This briefing document details the proceedings of a technical working group meeting on April 28, 2009, regarding unresolved air quality emission standards for various industrial categories. It records disputes and agreements between government representatives (DEAT, DEADP), industry bodies (SAISI, RMEF, FAPA, ACMP), and NGOs (LRC, Groundwork) over specific pollutant limits for NOx, SO2, particulate matter (PM), and heavy metals.

This document is an interim consolidated industry submission regarding the draft schedule for implementing Section 21 of the Air Quality Act. It outlines industry positions on minimum emission values, compliance timeframes, monitoring approaches, and the management of fugitive emissions and upset conditions, emphasizing the need for standards to be based on the Best Practicable Environmental Option (BPEO) principle within the South African context.

A submission by Sasol to Working Group 4 and a Subcommittee dated 9 March 2009 regarding proposed emission standards and the categorization of waste incinerators under the draft Section 21 of the National Environmental Management: Air Quality Act in South Africa.

This government notice, published on 22 November 2013, amends the list of activities resulting in atmospheric emissions that may have significant detrimental effects on the environment, health, social, economic, ecological, or cultural conditions. Issued by the Minister of Water and Environmental Affairs under the National Environmental Management: Air Quality Act, 2004, the document establishes minimum emission standards (MES) for ten industrial categories, including combustion installations, the petroleum industry, and metallurgical processes. It defines compliance timeframes for new and existing plants, monitoring requirements, and reporting protocols to the National Air Quality Officer.

This document is an industry submission from April 2009 regarding a draft notice and schedule for Section 21 of the Air Quality Act (AQA). It proposes minimum emission standards, transitional arrangements, and reporting requirements for various industrial activities, including combustion, petroleum, metallurgical, and chemical industries.

This document is a General Notice (No. 1001) published in the Government Gazette of South Africa on 24 July 2009 by the Minister of Water and Environmental Affairs. It outlines a proposed list of activities that result in atmospheric emissions which may have significant detrimental effects on the environment, health, social, economic, ecological, or cultural conditions, as well as their associated minimum emission standards (MES) under section 21 of the National Environmental Management: Air Quality Act, 2004.

The Chemical and Allied Industries Association (CAIA) submitted this statement in August 2009 to express concerns regarding a draft Notice on atmospheric emission limits. CAIA argues that the proposed standards are overly stringent, lack a Regulatory Impact Assessment, and deviate from previous working documents. The association advocates for flexible compliance timeframes, the ability to apply for exemptions based on site-specific impact reports, and the adoption of realistic minimum emission standards that consider technical feasibility and overall environmental footprints.

A letter from the South African Petroleum Industry Association (SAPIA) to the Director-General of Environmental Affairs dated 28 August 2009, providing comments and proposed amendments to the Listed Activities and Minimum Emission Standards published in Government Notice No. 32434 of 24 July 2009.

The Refinery Managers’ Environmental Forum (RMEF) submitted comments on August 21, 2009, regarding proposed regulations under the National Environmental Management: Air Quality Act (NEMAQA) in South Africa. The RMEF argues that the proposed minimum emission standards are technically and economically unachievable for existing refineries, particularly the requirement for existing plants to meet new plant standards within eight years. They advocate for a 'bubble approach' to measure total site impact rather than point-source monitoring and request specific adjustments to particulate matter (PM) and volatile organic compound (VOC) limits to align with Best Available Techniques (BAT) and economic viability.

A letter from the Refinery Manager’s Environmental Forum (RMEF) to the Department of Water and Environmental Affairs dated 23 September 2009, outlining industry concerns and proposed amendments regarding minimum emission standards for the petroleum sector under the National Environmental Management: Air Quality Act.

This October 2009 briefing document from the South African Department of Environmental Affairs outlines the logic, guiding principles, and stakeholder responses regarding the establishment of 'Listed Activities' and their associated minimum emission standards under the National Environmental Management: Air Quality Act (AQA). It details the transition from the older Atmospheric Pollution Prevention Act (APPA) to the AQA, the technical process for setting standards via the South African Bureau of Standards (SABS), and the department's refusal to allow 'grandfathering' for old industrial plants.

This government notice, published in the Government Gazette on 24 December 2009, establishes the national ambient air quality standards for South Africa under the National Environmental Management: Air Quality Act, 2004.

A letter from the South African Petroleum Industry Association (SAPIA) to the Department of Environmental Affairs dated 30 April 2010, expressing concerns over the final 'List of Activities' published under the National Environmental Management: Air Quality Act, 2004. SAPIA argues that the final legislation deviates significantly from the draft version without adequate consultation or explanation, specifically regarding sulphur dioxide limits, timelines for existing refineries, and vapour recovery mandates.