Search Climate Insights Directory

The report examines the negative externalities of coal power in South Africa, focusing on water consumption, pollution, and health impacts. It argues that the current energy planning (Draft IRP) underestimates the true cost of coal by ignoring water-related externalities, such as acid-mine drainage and the high cost of water treatment. The document suggests that internalising these costs would justify a rapid transition to water-efficient renewable energy, which would also create more jobs and reduce the disproportionate burden on marginalised communities.

The report defines and maps 22 national Strategic Water Source Areas for surface water (SWSA-sw) and 37 for groundwater (SWSA-gw) in South Africa, including transboundary areas in Lesotho and Swaziland. It links these areas to major urban centres and agricultural sectors, highlighting that a small percentage of land provides a disproportionate amount of the region's water. The study identifies significant threats from invasive alien plants, mining, and land degradation, and recommends integrating SWSAs into national policy, legislation, and spatial planning to ensure long-term water security.

The document examines how green bonds support the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), specifically highlighting six goals that receive direct benefits from green investment. It emphasizes that climate action is a crosscutting theme necessary for the success of all SDGs and calls for increased climate risk disclosure across all thematic bond labels to ensure long-term sustainability.

The document highlights the critical link between climate adaptation and the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), noting that infrastructure must be resilient to both chronic stress and acute shocks to remain functional. It identifies a significant investment gap, with UN estimates for developing countries reaching US$280-500 billion annually by 2050. Currently, the green bond market is heavily skewed toward mitigation, with only 3-5% of proceeds allocated to adaptation and resilience. The briefing calls for clearer definitions, improved sector-specific disclosure, and the integration of adaptation criteria across all thematic bonds to mobilize the necessary capital.

Iselula Crushing processes between 5,700 and 22,000 m3 of builders' rubble monthly to produce construction aggregates, diverting an equivalent volume from landfills and saving suppliers between R980,000 and R3.8 million in landfill costs per month. The facility recovers concrete, bricks, mortar, metal, tyres, timber, and PVC pipes, supporting 32 formal employees and 14 informal business opportunities for the local community.

The document outlines a four-step process for governments to leverage mining investments for national development: aligning with national objectives, taking stock of current capabilities, crafting specific policies, and establishing monitoring mechanisms. It details five types of local content policies: local procurement, direct employment, horizontal linkages (infrastructure and capabilities), downstream beneficiation, and the fostering of national mining firms. The guide emphasizes that policies must be context-specific, gender-equitable, and compliant with international trade and investment laws, while warning that automation may reduce future employment and procurement opportunities.

The document examines how the BRICS nations can better support African development priorities, specifically industrialisation and infrastructure. It highlights the role of South Africa in leveraging the BRICS forum for continental interests and discusses the potential of the New Development Bank (NDB). The briefing identifies critical challenges, including rising external debt, lack of transparency in lending, and unequal trade patterns where Africa primarily exports primary commodities. It recommends the creation of a dedicated BRICS–Africa strategy, a specialized BRICS unit within the African Union Commission (AUC), and improved coordination between bilateral BRICS initiatives and the AU's Agenda 2063.

The document argues that the SADC Regional Development Fund (RDF) should prioritise early-stage project preparation and national capacity building over direct project financing to address a critical dearth of bankable projects. It highlights that the region's infrastructure deficit is driven by bottlenecks in project definition and conceptualisation, often exacerbated by political agendas and a lack of technical expertise. The authors recommend incorporating the existing SADC Project Preparation and Development Fund (PPDF) into the RDF to leverage existing structures and shifting from reliance on international cooperating partner (ICP) funding to member state contributions to ensure regional ownership and sustainability.

The paper concludes that a regional SACU stabilisation fund is inappropriate and infeasible because member states experience different degrees of revenue volatility driven by different sources. While Lesotho, Namibia, and eSwatini are primarily affected by the SACU revenue pool's distribution formula, Botswana is driven by commodity revenues and South Africa by its internal tax base. The author argues that the core issue for the BLNS countries is the current revenue-sharing formula, which links their revenues to South African import patterns. The paper recommends that member states focus on revising the revenue-sharing formula or implementing country-level fiscal tools—such as medium-term expenditure frameworks, fiscal rules, or national stabilisation funds—rather than pursuing a regional fund.

The document examines the role of marine protected areas (MPAs) in South Africa, highlighting that current protection levels (0.4% of the mainland EEZ) are insufficient to mitigate anthropogenic threats and climate change. It advocates for reaching a 10% protection target by 2020 and supporting a '30% by 2030' goal. The brief details how MPAs provide climate mitigation services, such as carbon sequestration in seagrasses and coastal buffering via mangroves and coral reefs, while supporting fisheries through the 'spillover effect'. It identifies significant challenges, including conflicts with oil and gas exploration—which occupies over 90% of the continental EEZ—and the need to resolve customary rights and restitution claims for displaced communities.

The EU-SADC EPA provides Lesotho with tariff preferences and liberal rules of origin for exports to the EU, supported by a development envelope of EUR 6 million. However, Lesotho currently exports almost no agricultural or agro-processed products to European markets due to low production volumes, inability to meet stringent EU and South African standards, and fragmented coordination between government and donors. While aquaculture (freshwater trout) is growing, other produce like apples, peaches, and tomatoes remains local or limited to South African markets. The document recommends that Lesotho integrate into South African value chains as a stepping stone to the EU and focus development efforts on a few specific products to achieve the necessary scale.

The document evaluates women's empowerment in BRICS countries using World Economic Forum criteria, highlighting significant disparities in political representation, economic opportunity, and health. It argues against treating gender as a standalone issue, suggesting instead that the BRICS Gender and Women’s Forum should mainstream gender perspectives into the bloc's core agendas, including technological disruption, UN-aligned peacekeeping, and vaccine research platforms.

The Centre for Environmental Rights (CER), representing several environmental justice organisations, submitted provisional comments on June 29, 2018, regarding the Department of Environmental Affairs' (DEA) proposed amendments to the 2012 National Framework for Air Quality Management in South Africa. The CER argues that the public consultation process was inadequate and that the draft Framework fails to address systemic failures in air quality monitoring, enforcement, and the achievement of previous targets.

The South African Water Caucus (SAWC) identifies a state of "institutional crisis" within the Department of Water and Sanitation (DWS), citing severe financial mismanagement, human resource challenges, and a failure to maintain water infrastructure. The document highlights the critical risk posed by 212 wastewater treatment plants and the lack of water quality reporting since 2013. SAWC urges the Ministry to prioritize the establishment of nine Catchment Management Agencies (CMAs), protect 22 strategic water source areas, and address the R60 billion estimated cost for treating acid-mine drainage from approximately 5,906 derelict and ownerless mines. The letter also calls for water allocation reform to address inequities where industrial agriculture receives 60% of water but Black emerging farmers receive only 3% of that allocation.

The Centre for Environmental Rights, representing the Life After Coal/Impilo Ngaphandle Kwamalahle Campaign, submitted representations on June 25, 2018, regarding proposed amendments to the List of Activities resulting in atmospheric emissions. While supporting the elimination of 'rolling postponements' for minimum emission standards (MES), the submission argues for stricter requirements for once-off suspensions, greater transparency in application documents, and a more robust public participation process.

The Centre for Environmental Rights (CER) sent a formal request to the South African Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA) on 25 June 2018, demanding access to pollution prevention plans and greenhouse gas (GHG) reporting records. The CER disputes the DEA's claims of confidentiality regarding emissions data from major companies and calls for transparency to ensure the effectiveness of the national mitigation system.

The Centre for Environmental Rights (CER) has declined an invitation to debate the merits of legal challenges against a proposed coal mine by Atha-Africa Ventures Pty Ltd in a forum proposed by The Voice Community Representative Council. CER and its coalition of eight non-profit organisations oppose the mine because it is located within a declared protected area and a strategic water source area, which they argue would threaten South Africa's water security with non-mitigatable damage. While acknowledging the need for job creation, CER highlights the historical devastation of health and livelihoods caused by coal mining in the Mpumalanga Highveld. Instead of the proposed forum, CER invited The Voice to a meeting in Emalahleni, Mpumalanga, to view the impacts of existing mining and hear presentations on their opposition.

The Centre for Environmental Rights, on behalf of the Life After Coal/Impilo Ngaphandle Kwamalahle Campaign, supports the elimination of 'rolling postponements' for emission standards but argues that the draft legislation lacks sufficient safeguards. The submission recommends that postponement applications be contingent on ambient air quality compliance, require full public disclosure of decommissioning schedules, and mandate stricter emission standards for facilities seeking once-off suspensions, particularly in air quality priority areas.

The Centre for Environmental Rights (CER), representing various community-based and non-governmental organisations, submits that the 2018 Draft Amendments to the National Dust Control Regulations fail to address critical weaknesses in dust emission management and monitoring in South Africa. The CER argues that the reliance on the ASTM D1739 test method is inappropriate as it masks short-term high-emission events and does not protect human health. They advocate for the inclusion of 'best practicable environmental measures' (BPEM), mandatory PM10 monitoring, and specific geochemical and radionuclide analysis for dust from tailings storage facilities. The submission also emphasizes the need for stronger local government enforcement, particularly in priority areas like the Highveld, and calls for the regulations to take effect immediately rather than on 1 November 2019.

The document examines how green bonds support the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), specifically identifying SDGs 6, 7, 9, 11, 13, and 15 as those receiving the most direct benefit from green investment. It highlights that while clean energy (SDG7) remains the largest market share at 40%, other sectors like low carbon buildings (24%) and transport (15%) are significant. The author argues that climate change is a crosscutting threat to all SDGs and calls for the application of 'green' definitions and climate risk disclosure across all thematic bonds—including social and sustainability bonds—to avoid short-term gains that fail long-term climate targets. The briefing concludes that annual green bond issuance must scale to USD1 trillion by 2020 to meet these goals.